EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Patricia Goerner-Potvin
dblp:197/8259
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0003-2562-6694ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics
ChIP-seq analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning · Bioinform. 2017 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › ChIP-seq analysis
peak detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning · Bioinform. 2017 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
supervised learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learning · Bioinform. 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
visual labeling · 0.6supervised machine learning · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Optimizing ChIP-seq peak detectors using visual labels and supervised machine learningabstractMotivation: Many peak detection algorithms have been proposed for ChIP-seq data analysis, but it is not obvious which algorithm and what parameters are optimal for any given dataset. In contrast, regions with and without obvious peaks can be easily labeled by visual inspection of aligned read counts in a genome browser. We propose a supervised machine learning approach for ChIP-seq data analysis, using labels that encode qualitative judgments about which genomic regions contain or do not contain peaks. The main idea is to manually label a small subset of the genome, and then learn a model that makes consistent peak predictions on the rest of the genome. Results: We created 7 new histone mark datasets with 12 826 visually determined labels, and analyzed 3 existing transcription factor datasets. We observed that default peak detection parameters yield high false positive rates, which can be reduced by learning parameters using a relatively small training set of labeled data from the same experiment type. We also observed that labels from different people are highly consistent. Overall, these data indicate that our supervised labeling method is useful for quantitatively training and testing peak detection algorithms. Availability and Implementation: Labeled histone mark data http://cbio.ensmp.fr/~thocking/chip-seq-chunk-db/ , R package to compute the label error of predicted peaks https://github.com/tdhock/PeakError. Contacts: [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Toby Hocking, Patricia Goerner-Potvin, Andreanne Morin, Xiaojian Shao, Tomi Pastinen, Guillaume Bourque |
Bioinform. | 2 |