Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Visak C. V. Kumar
dblp:198/0584
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 69% Reinforcement learning · 27% Legged, aerial and field robots · 4% | |
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Accessibility and assistive technology · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning for control |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Learning a Control Policy for Fall Prevention on an Assistive Walking Device · ICRA 2020 Improving Model-Based Balance Controllers Using Reinforcement Learning and Adaptive Sampling · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Learning a Control Policy for Fall Prevention on an Assistive Walking Device · ICRA 2020 Improving Model-Based Balance Controllers Using Reinforcement Learning and Adaptive Sampling · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot learning |
0.8 | 2 | 2020 | Learning a Control Policy for Fall Prevention on an Assistive Walking Device · ICRA 2020 Improving Model-Based Balance Controllers Using Reinforcement Learning and Adaptive Sampling · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › locomotion control
balance control |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Improving Model-Based Balance Controllers Using Reinforcement Learning and Adaptive Sampling · ICRA 2018 |
Accessibility and assistive technology
assistive technology |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Learning a Control Policy for Fall Prevention on an Assistive Walking Device · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › dynamic stability
balance recovery |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Improving Model-Based Balance Controllers Using Reinforcement Learning and Adaptive Sampling · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
humanoid robot |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Improving Model-Based Balance Controllers Using Reinforcement Learning and Adaptive Sampling · ICRA 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.9optimal control · 0.3deep reinforcement learning · 0.3adaptive sampling · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Learning a Control Policy for Fall Prevention on an Assistive Walking DeviceabstractFall prevention is one of the most important components in senior care. We present a technique to augment an assistive walking device with the ability to prevent falls. Given an existing walking device, our method develops a fall predictor and a recovery policy by utilizing the onboard sensors and actuators. The key component of our method is a robust human walking policy that models realistic human gait under a moderate level of perturbations. We use this human walking policy to provide training data for the fall predictor, as well as to teach the recovery policy how to best modify the person's gait when a fall is imminent. Our evaluation shows that the human walking policy generates walking sequences similar to those reported in biomechanics literature. Our experiments in simulation show that the augmented assistive device can indeed help recover balance from a variety of external perturbations. We also provide a quantitative method to evaluate the design choices for an assistive device. Visak C. V. Kumar, Sehoon Ha, Gregory S. Sawicki, C. Karen Liu |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2019 | Sim-to-Real Transfer for Biped LocomotionabstractWe present a new approach for transfer of dynamic robot control policies such as biped locomotion from simulation to real hardware. Key to our approach is to perform system identification of the model parameters μ of the hardware (e.g. friction, center-of-mass) in two distinct stages, before policy learning (pre-sysID) and after policy learning (post-sysID). Pre-sysID begins by collecting trajectories from the physical hardware based on a set of generic motion sequences. Because the trajectories may not be related to the task of interest, presysID does not attempt to accurately identify the true value of μ, but only to approximate the range of μ to guide the policy learning. Next, a Projected Universal Policy (PUP) is created by simultaneously training a network that projects μ to a low-dimensional latent variable η and a family of policies that are conditioned on η. The second round of system identification (post-sysID) is then carried out by deploying the PUP on the robot hardware using task-relevant trajectories. We use Bayesian Optimization to determine the values for η that optimize the performance of PUP on the real hardware. We have used this approach to create three successful biped locomotion controllers (walk forward, walk backwards, walk sideways) on the Darwin OP2 robot. Wenhao Yu 0003, Visak C. V. Kumar, Greg Turk, C. Karen Liu |
IROS | 2 |
| 2018 | Improving Model-Based Balance Controllers Using Reinforcement Learning and Adaptive SamplingabstractBalance control to recover from a wide range of disturbances is an important skill for humanoid robots. Traditionally, researchers have often designed a balance controller by applying optimal control theory on a simplified model that abstracts the full-body dynamics. However, the resulting controller may not be able to recover from unexpected scenarios such as non-planar pushes, or fail to exploit full-body actions such as balancing with arm movements. This paper presents a learning framework for enhancing the performance of a model-based optimal controller by expanding the region of attraction (RoA). We train a control policy that generates additional control signals on top of the model-based controller using deep reinforcement learning techniques. Instead of relying on standard reinforcement learning formulations, we explicitly model the region of attraction and continuously adjust it during the training. By drawing the training disturbances at the boundary of the RoA, we can effectively expand the RoA while avoiding local minima. We test our learning framework for in-place balancing as well as balancing with stepping on a humanoid model in simulation. Visak C. V. Kumar, Sehoon Ha, Katsu Yamane |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2017 | Learning a unified control policy for safe fallingabstractBeing able to fall safely is a necessary motor skill for humanoids performing highly dynamic tasks, such as running and jumping. We propose a new method to learn a policy that minimizes the maximal impulse during the fall. The optimization solves for both a discrete contact planning problem and a continuous optimal control problem. Once trained, the policy can compute the optimal next contacting body part (e.g. left foot, right foot, or hands), contact location and timing, and the required joint actuation. We represent the policy as a mixture of actor-critic neural network, which consists of n control policies and the corresponding value functions. Each pair of actor-critic is associated with one of the n possible contacting body parts. During execution, the policy corresponding to the highest value function will be executed while the associated body part will be the next contact with the ground. With this mixture of actor-critic architecture, the discrete contact sequence planning is solved through the selection of the best critics while the continuous control problem is solved by the optimization of actors. We show that our policy can achieve comparable, sometimes even higher, rewards than a recursive search of the action space using dynamic programming, while enjoying 50 to 400 times of speed gain during online execution. Visak C. V. Kumar, Sehoon Ha, C. Karen Liu |
IROS | 1 |