EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Geoffrey Roeder
dblp:198/1349
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 44% Optimization for machine learning · 27% Representation and self-supervised learning · 10% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 92% Bioinformatics and computational biology · 8% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.6 | 2 | 2018 | Backpropagation through the Void: Optimizing control variates for black-box gradient estimation · ICLR (Poster) 2018 Sticking the Landing: Simple, Lower-Variance Gradient Estimators for Variational Inference · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning › identifiability
identifiability of representations |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representations · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
identifiability theory |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On Linear Identifiability of Learned Representations · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
structured prediction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Composable Energy Surrogates for PDE Order Reduction · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computational science and engineering › numerical analysis
model reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Composable Energy Surrogates for PDE Order Reduction · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
partial differential equation simulation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Composable Energy Surrogates for PDE Order Reduction · NeurIPS 2020 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
surrogate modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Learning Composable Energy Surrogates for PDE Order Reduction · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › amortized inference
amortized variational inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Amortised Bayesian Inference for Hierarchical and Nonlinear Dynamical Systems · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Amortised Bayesian Inference for Hierarchical and Nonlinear Dynamical Systems · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Efficient Amortised Bayesian Inference for Hierarchical and Nonlinear Dynamical Systems · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
black-box optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Backpropagation through the Void: Optimizing control variates for black-box gradient estimation · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
control variates |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Backpropagation through the Void: Optimizing control variates for black-box gradient estimation · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Backpropagation through the Void: Optimizing control variates for black-box gradient estimation · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
reparameterization gradient |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Sticking the Landing: Simple, Lower-Variance Gradient Estimators for Variational Inference · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Sticking the Landing: Simple, Lower-Variance Gradient Estimators for Variational Inference · NIPS 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network · 0.9finite element analysis · 0.9dataset aggregation · 0.9variational autoencoder · 0.8stochastic optimization · 0.8neural ODE · 0.8mixed-effects modeling · 0.8nonlinear independent component analysis · 0.5black-box gradient estimation · 0.3backpropagation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | On Linear Identifiability of Learned RepresentationsabstractIdentifiability is a desirable property of a statistical model: it implies that the true model parameters may be estimated to any desired precision, given sufficient computational resources and data. We study identifiability in the context of representation learning: discovering nonlinear data representations that are optimal with respect to some downstream task. When parameterized as deep neural networks, such representation functions lack identifiability in parameter space, because they are over-parameterized by design. In this paper, building on recent advances in nonlinear Independent Components Analysis, we aim to rehabilitate identifiability by showing that a large family of discriminative models are in fact identifiable in function space, up to a linear indeterminacy. Many models for representation learning in a wide variety of domains have been identifiable in this sense, including text, images and audio, state-of-the-art at time of publication. We derive sufficient conditions for linear identifiability and provide empirical support for the result on both simulated and real-world data. Geoffrey Roeder, Luke Metz, Durk Kingma |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Learning Composable Energy Surrogates for PDE Order ReductionabstractMeta-materials are an important emerging class of engineered materials in which complex macroscopic behaviour--whether electromagnetic, thermal, or mechanical--arises from modular substructure. Simulation and optimization of these materials are computationally challenging, as rich substructures necessitate high-fidelity finite element meshes to solve the governing PDEs. To address this, we leverage parametric modular structure to learn component-level surrogates, enabling cheaper high-fidelity simulation. We use a neural network to model the stored potential energy in a component given boundary conditions. This yields a structured prediction task: macroscopic behavior is determined by the minimizer of the system's total potential energy, which can be approximated by composing these surrogate models. Composable energy surrogates thus permit simulation in the reduced basis of component boundaries. Costly ground-truth simulation of the full structure is avoided, as training data are generated by performing finite element analysis of individual components. Using dataset aggregation to choose training data allows us to learn energy surrogates which produce accurate macroscopic behavior when composed, accelerating simulation of parametric meta-materials. Alex Beatson, Jordan T. Ash, Geoffrey Roeder, Tianju Xue, Ryan P. Adams |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2019 | Efficient Amortised Bayesian Inference for Hierarchical and Nonlinear Dynamical SystemsabstractWe introduce a flexible, scalable Bayesian inference framework for nonlinear dynamical systems characterised by distinct and hierarchical variability at the individual, group, and population levels. Our model class is a generalisation of nonlinear mixed-effects (NLME) dynamical systems, the statistical workhorse for many experimental sciences. We cast parameter inference as stochastic optimisation of an end-to-end differentiable, block-conditional variational autoencoder. We specify the dynamics of the data-generating process as an ordinary differential equation (ODE) such that both the ODE and its solver are fully differentiable. This model class is highly flexible: the ODE right-hand sides can be a mixture of user-prescribed or "white-box" sub-components and neural network or "black-box" sub-components. Using stochastic optimisation, our amortised inference algorithm could seamlessly scale up to massive data collection pipelines (common in labs with robotic automation). Finally, our framework supports interpretability with respect to the underlying dynamics, as well as predictive generalization to unseen combinations of group components (also called “zero-shot" learning). We empirically validate our method by predicting the dynamic behaviour of bacteria that were genetically engineered to function as biosensors. Geoffrey Roeder, Paul K. Grant, Andrew Phillips, Neil Dalchau, Edward Meeds |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Backpropagation through the Void: Optimizing control variates for black-box gradient estimation
Will Grathwohl, Dami Choi, Yuhuai Wu, Geoffrey Roeder, David Duvenaud |
ICLR (Poster) | 4 |
| 2017 | Sticking the Landing: Simple, Lower-Variance Gradient Estimators for Variational InferenceabstractWe propose a simple and general variant of the standard reparameterized gradient estimator for the variational evidence lower bound. Specifically, we remove a part of the total derivative with respect to the variational parameters that corresponds to the score function. Removing this term produces an unbiased gradient estimator whose variance approaches zero as the approximate posterior approaches the exact posterior. We analyze the behavior of this gradient estimator theoretically and empirically, and generalize it to more complex variational distributions such as mixtures and importance-weighted posteriors. Geoffrey Roeder, Yuhuai Wu, David Duvenaud |
NIPS | 1 |