Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mengqi Peng

dblp:198/1417 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Geometric modeling and processing · 57% Computer animation and physical simulation · 42%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › shape modeling › geometry editing
3d sculpting
0.822020
Autocomplete Animated Sculpting · UIST 2020
Autocomplete 3D sculpting · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018
Computer animation and physical simulation
keyframe animation
0.412020
Autocomplete Animated Sculpting · UIST 2020
Computer animation and physical simulation
animation authoring
0.112020
Autocomplete Animated Sculpting · UIST 2020
Interaction techniques and input › spatial interaction
3d interaction
0.112018
Autocomplete 3D sculpting · ACM Trans. Graph. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

workflow analysis · 0.7shape synthesis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Autocomplete Animated Sculpting
abstract
Keyframe-based sculpting provides unprecedented freedom to author animated organic models, which can be difficult to create with other methods such as simulation, scripting, and rigging. However, sculpting animated objects can require significant artistic skill and manual labor, even more so than sculpting static 3D shapes or drawing 2D animations, which are already quite challenging.
Mengqi Peng, Li-Yi Wei, Rubaiat Habib Kazi, Vladimir G. Kim
UIST1
2018 Autocomplete 3D sculpting
abstract
Digital sculpting is a popular means to create 3D models but remains a challenging task. We propose a 3D sculpting system that assists users, especially novices, in freely creating models with reduced input labor and enhanced output quality. With an interactive sculpting interface, our system silently records and analyzes users' workflows including brush strokes and camera movements, and predicts what they might do in the future. Users can accept, partially accept, or ignore the suggestions and thus retain full control and individual style. They can also explicitly select and clone past workflows over output model regions. Our key idea is to consider how a model is authored via dynamic workflows in addition to what is shaped in static geometry. This allows our method for more accurate analysis of user intentions and more general synthesis of shape structures than prior workflow or geometry methods, such as large overlapping deformations. We evaluate our method via user feedbacks and authored models.
Mengqi Peng, Jun Xing, Li-Yi Wei
ACM Trans. Graph.1