Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Stefano Martiniani
dblp:198/1458
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Generative modeling · 51% Representation and self-supervised learning · 35% Deep learning architectures and training · 7% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Emerging computing paradigms · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning As Neural Manifold Packing · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model › continuous-time generative model
stochastic interpolants |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Open Materials Generation with Stochastic Interpolants · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › materials science
crystal structure prediction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | All that structure matches does not glitter · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › materials science
materials discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Open Materials Generation with Stochastic Interpolants · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
materials science |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | All that structure matches does not glitter · NeurIPS 2025 |
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unconditional stability of a recurrent neural circuit implementing divisive normalization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Open Materials Generation with Stochastic Interpolants · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
flow matching |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Open Materials Generation with Stochastic Interpolants · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | All that structure matches does not glitter · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning As Neural Manifold Packing · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
gradient stability |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unconditional stability of a recurrent neural circuit implementing divisive normalization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unconditional stability of a recurrent neural circuit implementing divisive normalization · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
polymorph-aware data splitting · 1.7match rate metric correction · 1.7equivariant graph neural network · 1.7discrete flow matching · 1.7deduplication · 1.7lyapunov stability analysis · 1.5backpropagation through time · 1.5potential energy loss · 0.9manifold packing · 0.9contrastive learning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Open Materials Generation with Stochastic InterpolantsabstractThe discovery of new materials is essential for enabling technological advancements. Computational approaches for predicting novel materials must effectively learn the manifold of stable crystal structures within an infinite design space. We introduce Open Materials Generation (OMatG), a unifying framework for the generative design and discovery of inorganic crystalline materials. OMatG employs stochastic interpolants (SI) to bridge an arbitrary base distribution to the target distribution of inorganic crystals via a broad class of tunable stochastic processes, encompassing both diffusion models and flow matching as special cases. In this work, we adapt the SI framework by integrating an equivariant graph representation of crystal structures and extending it to account for periodic boundary conditions in unit cell representations. Additionally, we couple the SI flow over spatial coordinates and lattice vectors with discrete flow matching for atomic species. We benchmark OMatG’s performance on two tasks: Crystal Structure Prediction (CSP) for specified compositions, and de novo generation (DNG) aimed at discovering stable, novel, and unique structures. In our ground-up implementation of OMatG, we refine and extend both CSP and DNG metrics compared to previous works. OMatG establishes a new state of the art in generative modeling for materials discovery, outperforming purely flow-based and diffusion-based implementations. These results underscore the importance of designing flexible deep learning frameworks to accelerate progress in materials science. The OMatG code is available at https://github.com/FERMat-ML/OMatG. Philipp Höllmer, Thomas Egg, Maya M. Martirossyan, Eric Fuemmeler, Zeren Shui, Pawan Prakash, Adrian E. Roitberg, George Karypis, Mark K. Transtrum, Richard G. Hennig, Ellad B. Tadmor, Stefano Martiniani |
ICML | 14 |
| 2025 | All that structure matches does not glitterabstractGenerative models for materials, especially inorganic crystals, hold potential to transform the theoretical prediction of novel compounds and structures. Advancement in this field depends critically on robust benchmarks and minimal, information-rich datasets that enable meaningful model evaluation. This paper critically examines common datasets and reported metrics for a crystal structure prediction task—generating the most likely structures given the chemical composition of a material. We focus on three key issues: First, materials datasets should contain unique crystal structures; for example, we show that the widely-utilized carbon-24 dataset only contains $\approx 40$% unique structures. Second, materials datasets should not be split randomly if polymorphs of many different compositions are numerous—which we find to be the case for the perov-5 and MP-20 datasets. Third, benchmarks can mislead if used uncritically, e.g., reporting a match rate metric without considering the structural variety exhibited by identical building blocks. To address these oft-overlooked issues, we introduce several fixes. We provide revised versions of the carbon-24 dataset: one with duplicates removed, one deduplicated and split by number of atoms $N$, one with enantiomorphs, and two containing only identical structures but with different unit cells. We also propose new splits for datasets with polymorphs, ensuring that polymorphs are grouped within each split subset, setting a more sensible standard for benchmarking model performance. Finally, we present METRe and cRMSE, new model evaluation metrics that can correct existing issues with the match rate metric. Maya M. Martirossyan, Thomas Egg, Philipp Höllmer, George Karypis, Mark K. Transtrum, Adrian E. Roitberg, Richard G. Hennig, Ellad B. Tadmor, Stefano Martiniani |
NeurIPS | 10 |
| 2025 | Contrastive Self-Supervised Learning As Neural Manifold PackingabstractContrastive self-supervised learning based on point-wise comparisons has been widely studied for vision tasks. In the visual cortex of the brain, neuronal responses to distinct stimulus classes are organized into geometric structures known as neural manifolds. Accurate classification of stimuli can be achieved by effectively separating these manifolds, akin to solving a packing problem. We introduce Contrastive Learning As Manifold Packing (CLAMP), a self-supervised framework that recasts representation learning as a manifold packing problem. CLAMP introduces a loss function inspired by the potential energy of short-range repulsive particle systems,
such as those encountered in the physics of simple liquids and jammed packings. In this framework, each class consists of sub-manifolds embedding multiple augmented views of a single image. The sizes and positions of the sub-manifolds are dynamically optimized by following the gradient of a packing loss. This approach yields interpretable dynamics in the embedding space that parallel jamming physics,
and introduces geometrically meaningful hyperparameters within the loss function. Under the standard linear evaluation protocol, which freezes the backbone and trains only a linear classifier, CLAMP achieves competitive performance with state-of-the-art self-supervised models. Furthermore, our analysis reveals that neural manifolds corresponding to different categories emerge naturally and are
effectively separated in the learned representation space, highlighting the potential of CLAMP to bridge insights from physics, neural science, and machine learning. Guanming Zhang, David J. Heeger, Stefano Martiniani |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Unconditional stability of a recurrent neural circuit implementing divisive normalizationabstractStability in recurrent neural models poses a significant challenge, particularly in developing biologically plausible neurodynamical models that can be seamlessly trained. Traditional cortical circuit models are notoriously difficult to train due to expansive nonlinearities in the dynamical system, leading to an optimization problem with nonlinear stability constraints that are difficult to impose. Conversely, recurrent neural networks (RNNs) excel in tasks involving sequential data but lack biological plausibility and interpretability. In this work, we address these challenges by linking dynamic divisive normalization (DN) to the stability of "oscillatory recurrent gated neural integrator circuits'' (ORGaNICs), a biologically plausible recurrent cortical circuit model that dynamically achieves DN and that has been shown to simulate a wide range of neurophysiological phenomena. By using the indirect method of Lyapunov, we prove the remarkable property of unconditional local stability for an arbitrary-dimensional ORGaNICs circuit when the recurrent weight matrix is the identity. We thus connect ORGaNICs to a system of coupled damped harmonic oscillators, which enables us to derive the circuit's energy function, providing a normative principle of what the circuit, and individual neurons, aim to accomplish. Further, for a generic recurrent weight matrix, we prove the stability of the 2D model and demonstrate empirically that stability holds in higher dimensions. Finally, we show that ORGaNICs can be trained by backpropagation through time without gradient clipping/scaling, thanks to its intrinsic stability property and adaptive time constants, which address the problems of exploding, vanishing, and oscillating gradients. By evaluating the model's performance on RNN benchmarks, we find that ORGaNICs outperform alternative neurodynamical models on static image classification tasks and perform comparably to LSTMs on sequential tasks. Shivang Rawat, David J. Heeger, Stefano Martiniani |
NeurIPS | 3 |