Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anna Sepliarskaia

dblp:198/4174 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Learning theory · 46% Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 23%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
0.912025
On the VC dimension of deep group convolutional neural networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
group convolutional network
0.912025
On the VC dimension of deep group convolutional neural networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › computational learning theory › VC theory
VC dimension
0.912025
On the VC dimension of deep group convolutional neural networks · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.612022
LieGG: Studying Learned Lie Group Generators · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › out-of-distribution generalization
invariant learning
0.612022
LieGG: Studying Learned Lie Group Generators · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

equivariant neural network · 0.9ReLU activation · 0.9lie group theory · 0.6generator extraction · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 On the VC dimension of deep group convolutional neural networks
abstract
Recent works have introduced new equivariant neural networks, motivated by their improved generalization compared to traditional deep neural networks. While experiments support this advantage, the theoretical understanding of their generalization properties remains limited. In this paper, we analyze the generalization capabilities of Group Convolutional Neural Networks (GCNNs) with the ReLU activation function through the lens of Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension theory. We investigate how architectural factors—such as the number of layers, weights, and input dimensions—affect the VC dimension. A key challenge in our analysis is proving a lower bound on the VC dimension, for which we introduce new techniques, establishing a novel connection between GCNNs and standard deep neural networks. Additionally, we compare our derived bounds to those known for fully connected neural networks. Our results extend previous findings on the VC dimension of continuous GCNNs with two layers, offering new insights into their generalization behavior, particularly their dependence on input resolution.
Anna Sepliarskaia, Sophie Langer, Johannes Schmidt-Hieber
NeurIPS1
2024 VC dimensions of group convolutional neural networks
abstract
We study the generalization capacity of group convolutional neural networks. We identify precise estimates for the VC dimensions of simple sets of group convolutional neural networks. In particular, we find that for infinite groups and appropriately chosen convolutional kernels, already two-parameter families of convolutional neural networks have an infinite VC dimension, despite being invariant to the action of an infinite group.
Philipp Petersen, Anna Sepliarskaia
Neural Networks2
2022 LieGG: Studying Learned Lie Group Generators
abstract
Symmetries built into a neural network have appeared to be very beneficial for a wide range of tasks as it saves the data to learn them. We depart from the position that when symmetries are not built into a model a priori, it is advantageous for robust networks to learn symmetries directly from the data to fit a task function. In this paper, we present a method to extract symmetries learned by a neural network and to evaluate the degree to which a network is invariant to them. With our method, we are able to explicitly retrieve learned invariances in a form of the generators of corresponding Lie-groups without prior knowledge of symmetries in the data. We use the proposed method to study how symmetrical properties depend on a neural network's parameterization and configuration. We found that the ability of a network to learn symmetries generalizes over a range of architectures. However, the quality of learned symmetries depends on the depth and the number of parameters.
Artem Moskalev, Anna Sepliarskaia, Ivan Sosnovik, Arnold W. M. Smeulders
NeurIPS2
2018 Preference elicitation as an optimization problem
abstract
The new user coldstart problem arises when a recommender system does not yet have any information about a user. A common solution to it is to generate a profile by asking the user to rate a number of items. Which items are selected determines the quality of the recommendations made, and thus has been studied extensively. We propose a new elicitation method to generate a static preference questionnaire (SPQ) that poses relative preference questions to the user. Using a latent factor model, we show that SPQ improves personalized recommendations by choosing a minimal and diverse set of questions. We are the first to rigorously prove which optimization task should be solved to select each question in static questionnaires. Our theoretical results are confirmed by extensive experimentation. We test the performance of SPQ on two real-world datasets, under two experimental conditions: simulated, when users behave according to a latent factor model (LFM), and real, in which only real user judgments are revealed as the system asks questions. We show that SPQ reduces the necessary length of a questionnaire by up to a factor of three compared to state-of-the-art preference elicitation methods. Moreover, solving the right optimization task, SPQ also performs better than baselines with dynamically generated questions.
Anna Sepliarskaia, Julia Kiseleva, Filip Radlinski, Maarten de Rijke
RecSys1
2017 Simple Personalized Search Based on Long-Term Behavioral Signals
Anna Sepliarskaia, Filip Radlinski, Maarten de Rijke
ECIR1