Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Nathan D. King
dblp:198/6205
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-4105-0189ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 92% Computer animation and physical simulation · 8% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Geometric modeling and processing
surface processing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Closest Point Method for PDEs on Manifolds with Interior Boundary Conditions for Geometry Processing · ACM Trans. Graph. 2024 |
Geometric modeling and processing › surface processing
geodesic distance computation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Projected Walk on Spheres: A Monte Carlo Closest Point Method for Surface PDEs · SIGGRAPH Asia 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
closest point method · 1.5walk on spheres · 0.8sparse-grid solver · 0.8mean value filtering · 0.8finite differences · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Projected Walk on Spheres: A Monte Carlo Closest Point Method for Surface PDEsabstractWe present projected walk on spheres (PWoS), a novel pointwise and discretization-free Monte Carlo solver for surface PDEs with Dirichlet boundaries, as a generalization of the walk on spheres method (WoS) [Muller 1956; Sawhney and Crane 2020]. We adapt the recursive relationship of WoS designed for PDEs in volumetric domains to a volumetric neighborhood around the surface, and at the end of each recursion step, we project the sample point on the sphere back to the surface. We motivate this simple modification to WoS with the theory of the closest point extension used in the closest point method. To define the valid volumetric neighborhood domain for PWoS, we develop strategies to estimate the local feature size of the surface and to compute the distance to the Dirichlet boundaries on the surface extended in their normal directions. We also design a mean value filtering method for PWoS to improve the method's efficiency when the surface is represented as a polygonal mesh or a point cloud. Finally, we study the convergence of PWoS and demonstrate its application to graphics tasks, including diffusion curves, geodesic distance computation, and wave propagation animation. We show that our method works with various types of surfaces, including a surface of mixed codimension. Ryusuke Sugimoto, Nathan D. King, Toshiya Hachisuka, Christopher Batty |
SIGGRAPH Asia | 2 |
| 2024 | A Closest Point Method for PDEs on Manifolds with Interior Boundary Conditions for Geometry ProcessingabstractMany geometry processing techniques require the solution of partial differential equations (PDEs) on manifolds embedded in ℝ 2 or ℝ 3 , such as curves or surfaces. Such manifold PDEs often involve boundary conditions (e.g., Dirichlet or Neumann) prescribed at points or curves on the manifold’s interior or along the geometric (exterior) boundary of an open manifold. However, input manifolds can take many forms (e.g., triangle meshes, parametrizations, point clouds, implicit functions, etc.). Typically, one must generate a mesh to apply finite element-type techniques or derive specialized discretization procedures for each distinct manifold representation. We propose instead to address such problems in a unified manner through a novel extension of the closest point method (CPM) to handle interior boundary conditions. CPM solves the manifold PDE by solving a volumetric PDE defined over the Cartesian embedding space containing the manifold and requires only a closest point representation of the manifold. Hence, CPM supports objects that are open or closed, orientable or not, and of any codimension. To enable support for interior boundary conditions, we derive a method that implicitly partitions the embedding space across interior boundaries. CPM’s finite difference and interpolation stencils are adapted to respect this partition while preserving second-order accuracy. Additionally, we develop an efficient sparse-grid implementation and numerical solver that can scale to tens of millions of degrees of freedom, allowing PDEs to be solved on more complex manifolds. We demonstrate our method’s convergence behavior on selected model PDEs and explore several geometry processing problems: diffusion curves on surfaces, geodesic distance, tangent vector field design, harmonic map construction, and reaction-diffusion textures. Our proposed approach thus offers a powerful and flexible new tool for a range of geometry processing tasks on general manifold representations. Nathan D. King, Haozhe Su, Mridul Aanjaneya, Steven J. Ruuth, Christopher Batty |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 1 |