Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Kyohei Atarashi
dblp:198/8718
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
6as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0007-7765-8002ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 38% Learning theory · 19% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Recommender systems · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computing education · 100% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Unpacking the Implicit Norm Dynamics of Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Tensorized Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
implicit regularization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Unpacking the Implicit Norm Dynamics of Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Tensorized Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › gradient-based optimization
sharpness-aware minimization |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Unpacking the Implicit Norm Dynamics of Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Tensorized Models · AAAI 2026 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization
sparse regularization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Factorization Machines with Regularization for Sparse Feature Interactions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Recommender systems › factorization models
factorization machines |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Factorization Machines with Regularization for Sparse Feature Interactions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Recommender systems › click-through rate prediction
feature interaction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Factorization Machines with Regularization for Sparse Feature Interactions · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › latent factor model
factorization machines |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Random Feature Maps for the Itemset Kernel · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Random Feature Maps for the Itemset Kernel · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods › kernel methods › kernel approximation
random features |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Random Feature Maps for the Itemset Kernel · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
learning from crowds |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Semi-Supervised Learning From Crowds Using Deep Generative Models · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Semi-Supervised Learning From Crowds Using Deep Generative Models · AAAI 2018 |
Computing education › STEM education
data science education |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Data Analysis Competition Platform for Educational Purposes: Lessons Learned and Future Challenges · AAAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
scale-invariance analysis · 1.0proximal algorithm · 1.0gradient flow analysis · 1.0case study · 0.7signed circulant matrix projection · 0.4random feature maps · 0.4inference model · 0.3deep neural network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Unpacking the Implicit Norm Dynamics of Sharpness-Aware Minimization in Tensorized ModelsabstractSharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) has been proven to be an effective optimization technique for improving generalization in overparameterized models. While prior works have explored the implicit regularization of SAM in simple two-core scale-invariant settings, its behavior in more general tensorized or scale-invariant models remains underexplored. In this work, we leverage scale-invariance to analyze the norm dynamics of SAM in general tensorized models. We introduce the notion of Norm Deviation as a global measure of core norm imbalance, and derive its evolution under SAM using gradient flow analysis. We show that SAM's implicit control of Norm Deviation is governed by the covariance between core norms and their gradient magnitudes. Motivated by these findings, we propose a simple yet effective method, Deviation-Aware Scaling (DAS), which explicitly mimics this regularization behavior by scaling core norms in a data-adaptive manner. Our experiments across tensor completion, noisy training, model compression, and parameter-efficient fine-tuning confirm that DAS achieves competitive or improved performance over SAM, while offering reduced computational overhead. Tianxiao Cao, Kyohei Atarashi, Hisashi Kashima |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2026 | Estimating Learners' Skill Acquisition Without Temporal Information
Ryosuke Nagai, Kyohei Atarashi, Koh Takeuchi 0001, Jill-Jênn Vie, Hisashi Kashima |
AIED (3) | 2 |
| 2026 | Privacy-Preserving Image Annotation by Large Multimodal Models
Yuki Wakai, Kyohei Atarashi, Koh Takeuchi 0001, Hisashi Kashima |
ICPR (10) | 2 |
| 2021 | Vertical Federated Learning for Higher-Order Factorization Machines
Kyohei Atarashi, Masakazu Ishihata |
PAKDD (2) | 1 |
| 2021 | Factorization Machines with Regularization for Sparse Feature InteractionsabstractFactorization machines (FMs) are machine learning predictive models based on second-order feature interactions and FMs with sparse regularization are called sparse FMs. Such regularizations enable feature selection, which selects the most relevant features for accurate prediction, and therefore they can contribute to the improvement of the model accuracy and interpretability. However, because FMs use second-order feature interactions, the selection of features often causes the loss of many relevant feature interactions in the resultant models. In such cases, FMs with regularization specially designed for feature interaction selection trying to achieve interaction-level sparsity may be preferred instead of those just for feature selection trying to achieve feature-level sparsity. In this paper, we present a new regularization scheme for feature interaction selection in FMs. For feature interaction selection, our proposed regularizer makes the feature interaction matrix sparse without a restriction on sparsity patterns imposed by the existing methods. We also describe efficient proximal algorithms for the proposed FMs and how our ideas can be applied or extended to feature selection and other related models such as higher-order FMs and the all-subsets model. The analysis and experimental results on synthetic and real-world datasets show the effectiveness of the proposed methods. Kyohei Atarashi, Satoshi Oyama, Masahito Kurihara |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2021 | Sparse random feature maps for the item-multiset kernel
Kyohei Atarashi, Satoshi Oyama, Masahito Kurihara |
Neural Networks | 1 |
| 2019 | Random Feature Maps for the Itemset KernelabstractAlthough kernel methods efficiently use feature combinations without computing them directly, they do not scale well with the size of the training dataset. Factorization machines (FMs) and related models, on the other hand, enable feature combinations efficiently, but their optimization generally requires solving a non-convex problem. We present random feature maps for the itemset kernel, which uses feature combinations, and includes the ANOVA kernel, the all-subsets kernel, and the standard dot product. Linear models using one of our proposed maps can be used as an alternative to kernel methods and FMs, resulting in better scalability during both training and evaluation. We also present theoretical results for a proposed map, discuss the relationship between factorization machines and linear models using a proposed map for the ANOVA kernel, and relate the proposed feature maps to prior work. Furthermore, we show that the maps can be calculated more efficiently by using a signed circulant matrix projection technique. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of using the proposed maps for real-world datasets.. Kyohei Atarashi, Subhransu Maji, Satoshi Oyama |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | Semi-Supervised Learning From Crowds Using Deep Generative ModelsabstractAlthough supervised learning requires a labeled dataset, obtaining labels from experts is generally expensive. For this reason, crowdsourcing services are attracting attention in the field of machine learning as a way to collect labels at relatively low cost. However, the labels obtained by crowdsourcing, i.e., from non-expert workers, are often noisy. A number of methods have thus been devised for inferring true labels, and several methods have been proposed for learning classifiers directly from crowdsourced labels, referred to as "learning from crowds." A more practical problem is learning from crowdsourced labeled data and unlabeled data, i.e., "semi-supervised learning from crowds." This paper presents a novel generative model of the labeling process in crowdsourcing. It leverages unlabeled data effectively by introducing latent features and a data distribution. Because the data distribution can be complicated, we use a deep neural network for the data distribution. Therefore, our model can be regarded as a kind of deep generative model. The problems caused by the intractability of latent variable posteriors is solved by introducing an inference model. The experiments show that it outperforms four existing models, including a baseline model, on the MNIST dataset with simulated workers and the Rotten Tomatoes movie review dataset with Amazon Mechanical Turk workers. Kyohei Atarashi, Satoshi Oyama, Masahito Kurihara |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | Data Analysis Competition Platform for Educational Purposes: Lessons Learned and Future ChallengesabstractData analysis education plays an important role in accelerating the efficient use of data analysis technologies in various domains. Not only the knowledge of statistics and machine learning, but also practical skills of deploying machine learning and data analysis techniques, are required for conducting data analysis projects in the real world. Data analysis competitions, such as Kaggle, have been considered as an efficient system for learning such skills by addressing real data analysis problems. However, current data analysis competitions are not designed for educational purposes and it is not well studied how data analysis competition platforms should be designed for enhancing educational effectiveness. To answer this research question, we built, and subsequently operated an educational data analysis competition platform called University of Big Data for several years. In this paper, we present our approaches for supporting and motivating learners and the results of our case studies. We found that providing a tutorial article is beneficial for encouraging active participation of learners, and a leaderboard system allowing an unlimited number of submissions can motivate the efforts of learners. We further discuss future directions of educational data analysis competitions. Yukino Baba, Tomoumi Takase, Kyohei Atarashi, Satoshi Oyama, Hisashi Kashima |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2017 | A Deep Neural Network for Pairwise Classification: Enabling Feature Conjunctions and Ensuring Symmetry
Kyohei Atarashi, Satoshi Oyama, Masahito Kurihara, Kazune Furudo |
PAKDD (1) | 1 |