Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raphael R. Campos
dblp:198/9222
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › ensemble learning
boosting |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Stacking Bagged and Boosted Forests for Effective Automated Classification · SIGIR 2017 |
Data mining › predictive modeling
classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Stacking Bagged and Boosted Forests for Effective Automated Classification · SIGIR 2017 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
ensemble learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Stacking Bagged and Boosted Forests for Effective Automated Classification · SIGIR 2017 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › ensemble learning
random forest |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Stacking Bagged and Boosted Forests for Effective Automated Classification · SIGIR 2017 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › ensemble learning
stacking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Stacking Bagged and Boosted Forests for Effective Automated Classification · SIGIR 2017 |
Data mining › text mining › sentiment analysis
sentiment classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Stacking Bagged and Boosted Forests for Effective Automated Classification · SIGIR 2017 |
Data mining › text mining › text classification
topic classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Stacking Bagged and Boosted Forests for Effective Automated Classification · SIGIR 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
out-of-bag sampling · 0.3bagging · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Document Performance Prediction for Automatic Text Classification
Gustavo Penha, Raphael R. Campos, Sérgio D. Canuto, Marcos André Gonçalves, Rodrygo L. T. Santos |
ECIR (2) | 2 |
| 2017 | Stacking Bagged and Boosted Forests for Effective Automated ClassificationabstractRandom Forest (RF) is one of the most successful strategies for automated classification tasks. Motivated by the RF success, recently proposed RF-based classification approaches leverage the central RF idea of aggregating a large number of low-correlated trees, which are inherently parallelizable and provide exceptional generalization capabilities. In this context, this work brings several new contributions to this line of research. First, we propose a new RF-based strategy (BERT) that applies the boosting technique in bags of extremely randomized trees. Second, we empirically demonstrate that this new strategy, as well as the recently proposed BROOF and LazyNN_RF classifiers do complement each other, motivating us to stack them to produce an even more effective classifier. Up to our knowledge, this is the first strategy to effectively combine the three main ensemble strategies: stacking, bagging (the cornerstone of RFs) and boosting. Finally, we exploit the efficient and unbiased stacking strategy based on out-of-bag (OOB) samples to considerably speedup the very costly training process of the stacking procedure. Our experiments in several datasets covering two high-dimensional and noisy domains of topic and sentiment classification provide strong evidence in favor of the benefits of our RF-based solutions. We show that BERT is among the top performers in the vast majority of analyzed cases, while retaining the unique benefits of RF classifiers (explainability, parallelization, easiness of parameterization). We also show that stacking only the recently proposed RF-based classifiers and BERT using our OOB-based strategy is not only significantly faster than recently proposed stacking strategies (up to six times) but also much more effective, with gains up to 21% and 17% on MacroF1 and MicroF1, respectively, over the best base method, and of 5% and 6% over a stacking of traditional methods, performing no worse than a complete stacking of methods at a much lower computational effort. Raphael R. Campos, Sérgio D. Canuto, Thiago Salles, Clebson C. A. de Sá, Marcos André Gonçalves |
SIGIR | 1 |