Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Bork

dblp:199/1409 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
k-mer sampling
0.312017
Improving the performance of minimizers and winnowing schemes · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › k-mer sampling
minimizers scheme
0.312017
Improving the performance of minimizers and winnowing schemes · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis
0.312017
Improving the performance of minimizers and winnowing schemes · Bioinform. 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

universal hitting sets · 0.6k-mer ordering analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Improving the performance of minimizers and winnowing schemes
abstract
MOTIVATION: The minimizers scheme is a method for selecting k -mers from sequences. It is used in many bioinformatics software tools to bin comparable sequences or to sample a sequence in a deterministic fashion at approximately regular intervals, in order to reduce memory consumption and processing time. Although very useful, the minimizers selection procedure has undesirable behaviors (e.g. too many k -mers are selected when processing certain sequences). Some of these problems were already known to the authors of the minimizers technique, and the natural lexicographic ordering of k -mers used by minimizers was recognized as their origin. Many software tools using minimizers employ ad hoc variations of the lexicographic order to alleviate those issues. RESULTS: We provide an in-depth analysis of the effect of k -mer ordering on the performance of the minimizers technique. By using small universal hitting sets (a recently defined concept), we show how to significantly improve the performance of minimizers and avoid some of its worse behaviors. Based on these results, we encourage bioinformatics software developers to use an ordering based on a universal hitting set or, if not possible, a randomized ordering, rather than the lexicographic order. This analysis also settles negatively a conjecture (by Schleimer et al. ) on the expected density of minimizers in a random sequence. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The software used for this analysis is available on GitHub: https://github.com/gmarcais/minimizers.git . CONTACT: [email protected] or [email protected].
Guillaume Marçais, David Pellow, Daniel Bork, Yaron Orenstein, Ron Shamir, Carl Kingsford
Bioinform.3