EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Valentin Khrulkov
dblp:199/1785
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
9as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-6694-5398ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 14 · 9 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
12 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 28% Generative modeling · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 17% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
3 papers |
Rendering · 37% Image and video coding · 21% Image and video processing · 21% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 72% Algorithms and data structures · 28% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 37, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Understanding DDPM Latent Codes Through Optimal Transport · ICLR 2023 Label-Efficient Semantic Segmentation with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2022 |
Rendering › non-photorealistic rendering
artistic rendering |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | YaART: Yet Another ART Rendering Technology · KDD (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.8 | 2 | 2021 | Functional Space Analysis of Local GAN Convergence · ICML 2021 Geometry Score: A Method For Comparing Generative Adversarial Networks · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network |
0.7 | 2 | 2019 | Generalized Tensor Models for Recurrent Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2019 Expressive power of recurrent neural networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
optimal transport |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding DDPM Latent Codes Through Optimal Transport · ICLR 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
annotation-efficient segmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Label-Efficient Semantic Segmentation with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hyperbolic Vision Transformers: Combining Improvements in Metric Learning · CVPR 2022 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Label-Efficient Semantic Segmentation with Diffusion Models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
vision transformer |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Hyperbolic Vision Transformers: Combining Improvements in Metric Learning · CVPR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Functional Space Analysis of Local GAN Convergence · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › function spaces
function space analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Functional Space Analysis of Local GAN Convergence · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › latent space
latent space manipulation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Latent Transformations via NeuralODEs for GAN-based Image Editing · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
tabular deep learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
tabular transformer |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular Data · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Functional Space Analysis of Local GAN Convergence · ICML 2021 |
Visual content generation and editing › image editing
GAN-based image editing |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Latent Transformations via NeuralODEs for GAN-based Image Editing · ICCV 2021 |
Image and video coding
image quality assessment |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Side-by-Side: Predicting Human Preferences for No-Reference Super-Resolution Evaluation · CVPR 2021 |
Image and video processing
super-resolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Neural Side-by-Side: Predicting Human Preferences for No-Reference Super-Resolution Evaluation · CVPR 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning › geometric representation learning
hyperbolic representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hyperbolic Image Embeddings · CVPR 2020 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hyperbolic Image Embeddings · CVPR 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F) · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
tensor decomposition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F) · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization
riemannian optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F) · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra › matrix and tensor decomposition › tensor decomposition
tensor train decomposition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F) · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Art of Singular Vectors and Universal Adversarial Perturbations · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Art of Singular Vectors and Universal Adversarial Perturbations · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
expressive power |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Expressive power of recurrent neural networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model evaluation
mode collapse detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Geometry Score: A Method For Comparing Generative Adversarial Networks · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial examples
universal adversarial perturbation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Art of Singular Vectors and Universal Adversarial Perturbations · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
continuous-time model |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Functional Space Analysis of Local GAN Convergence · ICML 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optimal transport · 1.3neural ODE · 1.0mean opinion score · 1.0convolutional neural network · 1.0StyleGAN · 1.0semi-supervised learning · 0.6pairwise cross-entropy loss · 0.6hyperbolic geometry · 0.6diffusion model · 0.6partial differential equations · 0.5gradient penalty · 0.5eigenvalue analysis · 0.5tensor train decomposition · 0.4riemannian optimization · 0.4automatic differentiation · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | YaART: Yet Another ART Rendering Technology
Sergey Kastryulin, Artem Konev, Alexander Shishenya, Eugene Lyapustin, Artem Khurshudov, Alexander Tselousov, Nikita Vinokurov, Denis Kuznedelev, Alexander Markovich, Grigoriy Livshits, Alexey Kirillov, Anastasiia Tabisheva, Liubov Chubarova, Marina Kaminskaia, Alexander Ustyuzhanin, Artemii Shvetsov, Daniil Shlenskii, Valerii Startsev, Dmitrii Kornilov, Mikhail Romanov, Dmitry Baranchuk, Artem Babenko, Sergei Ovcharenko, Valentin Khrulkov |
KDD (1) | 24 |
| 2023 | Understanding DDPM Latent Codes Through Optimal Transport
Valentin Khrulkov, Gleb V. Ryzhakov, Andrei Chertkov, Ivan V. Oseledets |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Hyperbolic Vision Transformers: Combining Improvements in Metric LearningabstractMetric learning aims to learn a highly discriminative model encouraging the embeddings of similar classes to be close in the chosen metrics and pushed apart for dissimilar ones. The common recipe is to use an encoder to extract embeddings and a distance-based loss function to match the representations - usually, the Euclidean distance is utilized. An emerging interest in learning hyperbolic data embeddings suggests that hyperbolic geometry can be beneficial for natural data. Following this line of work, we propose a new hyperbolic-based model for metric learning. At the core of our method is a vision transformer with output embeddings mapped to hyperbolic space. These embeddings are directly optimized using modified pairwise cross-entropy loss. We evaluate the proposed model with six different formulations on four datasets achieving the new state-of-the-art performance. The source code is available at https://github.com/htdt/hyp_metric. Aleksandr Ermolov, Leyla Mirvakhabova, Valentin Khrulkov, Nicu Sebe, Ivan V. Oseledets |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2022 | Label-Efficient Semantic Segmentation with Diffusion Models
Dmitry Baranchuk, Andrey Voynov, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem Babenko |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2021 | Neural Side-by-Side: Predicting Human Preferences for No-Reference Super-Resolution EvaluationabstractSuper-resolution based on deep convolutional networks is currently gaining much attention from both academia and industry. However, lack of proper evaluation measures makes it difficult to compare approaches, hampering progress in the field. Traditional measures, such as PSNR or SSIM, are known to poorly correlate with the human perception of image quality. Therefore, in existing works common practice is also to report Mean-Opinion-Score (MOS) — the results of human evaluation of super-resolved images. Unfortunately, the MOS values from different papers are not directly comparable, due to the varying number of raters, their subjectivity, etc. By this paper, we introduce Neural Side-By-Side — a new measure that allows super-resolution models to be compared automatically, effectively approximating human preferences. Namely, we collect a large dataset of aligned image pairs, which were produced by different super-resolution models. Then each pair is annotated by several raters, who were instructed to choose a more visually appealing image. Given the dataset and the labels, we trained a CNN model that obtains a pair of images and for each image predicts a probability of being more preferable than its counterpart. In this work, we show that Neural Side-By-Side generalizes across both new models and new data. Hence, it can serve as a natural approximation of human preferences, which can be used to compare models or tune hyperparameters without raters’ assistance. We open-source the dataset and the pretrained model1and expect that it will become a handy tool for researchers and practitioners. Valentin Khrulkov, Artem Babenko |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2021 | Latent Transformations via NeuralODEs for GAN-based Image EditingabstractRecent advances in high-fidelity semantic image editing heavily rely on the presumably disentangled latent spaces of the state-of-the-art generative models, such as Style-GAN. Specifically, recent works show that it is possible to achieve decent controllability of attributes in face images via linear shifts along with latent directions. Several recent methods address the discovery of such directions, implicitly assuming that the state-of-the-art GANs learn the latent spaces with inherently linearly separable attribute distributions and semantic vector arithmetic properties.In our work, we show that nonlinear latent code manipulations realized as flows of a trainable Neural ODE are beneficial for many practical non-face image domains with more complex non-textured factors of variation. In particular, we investigate a large number of datasets with known attributes and demonstrate that certain attribute manipulations are challenging to obtain with linear shifts only. Valentin Khrulkov, Leyla Mirvakhabova, Ivan V. Oseledets, Artem Babenko |
ICCV | 1 |
| 2021 | Functional Space Analysis of Local GAN ConvergenceabstractRecent work demonstrated the benefits of studying continuous-time dynamics governing the GAN training. However, this dynamics is analyzed in the model parameter space, which results in finite-dimensional dynamical systems. We propose a novel perspective where we study the local dynamics of adversarial training in the general functional space and show how it can be represented as a system of partial differential equations. Thus, the convergence properties can be inferred from the eigenvalues of the resulting differential operator. We show that these eigenvalues can be efficiently estimated from the target dataset before training. Our perspective reveals several insights on the practical tricks commonly used to stabilize GANs, such as gradient penalty, data augmentation, and advanced integration schemes. As an immediate practical benefit, we demonstrate how one can a priori select an optimal data augmentation strategy for a particular generation task. Valentin Khrulkov, Artem Babenko, Ivan V. Oseledets |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Revisiting Deep Learning Models for Tabular DataabstractThe existing literature on deep learning for tabular data proposes a wide range of novel architectures and reports competitive results on various datasets. However, the proposed models are usually not properly compared to each other and existing works often use different benchmarks and experiment protocols. As a result, it is unclear for both researchers and practitioners what models perform best. Additionally, the field still lacks effective baselines, that is, the easy-to-use models that provide competitive performance across different problems.In this work, we perform an overview of the main families of DL architectures for tabular data and raise the bar of baselines in tabular DL by identifying two simple and powerful deep architectures. The first one is a ResNet-like architecture which turns out to be a strong baseline that is often missing in prior works. The second model is our simple adaptation of the Transformer architecture for tabular data, which outperforms other solutions on most tasks. Both models are compared to many existing architectures on a diverse set of tasks under the same training and tuning protocols. We also compare the best DL models with Gradient Boosted Decision Trees and conclude that there is still no universally superior solution. The source code is available at https://github.com/yandex-research/rtdl. Yury Gorishniy, Ivan Rubachev, Valentin Khrulkov, Artem Babenko |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | Hyperbolic Image EmbeddingsabstractComputer vision tasks such as image classification, image retrieval, and few-shot learning are currently dominated by Euclidean and spherical embeddings so that the final decisions about class belongings or the degree of similarity are made using linear hyperplanes, Euclidean distances, or spherical geodesic distances (cosine similarity). In this work, we demonstrate that in many practical scenarios, hyperbolic embeddings provide a better alternative. Valentin Khrulkov, Leyla Mirvakhabova, Evgeniya Ustinova, Ivan V. Oseledets, Victor S. Lempitsky |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2020 | Performance of Hyperbolic Geometry Models on Top-N Recommendation TasksabstractWe introduce a simple autoencoder based on hyperbolic geometry for solving standard collaborative filtering problem. In contrast to many modern deep learning techniques, we build our solution using only a single hidden layer. Remarkably, even with such a minimalistic approach, we not only outperform the Euclidean counterpart but also achieve a competitive performance with respect to the current state-of-the-art. We additionally explore the effects of space curvature on the quality of hyperbolic models and propose an efficient data-driven method for estimating its optimal value. Leyla Mirvakhabova, Evgeny Frolov, Valentin Khrulkov, Ivan V. Oseledets, Alexander Tuzhilin |
RecSys | 3 |
| 2020 | Tensor Train Decomposition on TensorFlow (T3F)abstractTensor Train decomposition is used across many branches of machine learning. We present T3F—a library for Tensor Train decomposition based on TensorFlow. T3F supports GPU execution, batch processing, automatic differentiation, and versatile functionality for the Riemannian optimization framework, which takes into account the underlying manifold structure to construct efficient optimization methods. The library makes it easier to implement machine learning papers that rely on the Tensor Train decomposition. T3F includes documentation, examples and 94% test coverage. Alexander Novikov 0001, Pavel Izmailov, Valentin Khrulkov, Michael Figurnov, Ivan V. Oseledets |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2019 | Generalized Tensor Models for Recurrent Neural Networks
Valentin Khrulkov, Oleksii Hrinchuk, Ivan V. Oseledets |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Art of Singular Vectors and Universal Adversarial PerturbationsabstractVulnerability of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to adversarial attacks has been attracting a lot of attention in recent studies. It has been shown that for many state of the art DNNs performing image classification there exist universal adversarial perturbations - image-agnostic perturbations mere addition of which to natural images with high probability leads to their misclassification. In this work we propose a new algorithm for constructing such universal perturbations. Our approach is based on computing the so-called (p, q)-singular vectors of the Jacobian matrices of hidden layers of a network. Resulting perturbations present interesting visual patterns, and by using only 64 images we were able to construct universal perturbations with more than 60 % fooling rate on the dataset consisting of 50000 images. We also investigate a correlation between the maximal singular value of the Jacobian matrix and the fooling rate of the corresponding singular vector, and show that the constructed perturbations generalize across networks. Valentin Khrulkov, Ivan V. Oseledets |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2018 | Expressive power of recurrent neural networks
Valentin Khrulkov, Alexander Novikov 0001, Ivan V. Oseledets |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Geometry Score: A Method For Comparing Generative Adversarial NetworksabstractOne of the biggest challenges in the research of generative adversarial networks (GANs) is assessing the quality of generated samples and detecting various levels of mode collapse. In this work, we construct a novel measure of performance of a GAN by comparing geometrical properties of the underlying data manifold and the generated one, which provides both qualitative and quantitative means for evaluation. Our algorithm can be applied to datasets of an arbitrary nature and is not limited to visual data. We test the obtained metric on various real-life models and datasets and demonstrate that our method provides new insights into properties of GANs. Valentin Khrulkov, Ivan V. Oseledets |
ICML | 1 |