Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dhruv Madeka
dblp:199/1884
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 28% Efficient and distributed learning · 27% Language models and text generation · 27% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Speculative Knowledge Distillation: Bridging the Teacher-Student Gap Through Interleaved Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Speculative Knowledge Distillation: Bridging the Teacher-Student Gap Through Interleaved Sampling · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › sample complexity
sample complexity lower bounds |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Few Expert Queries Suffices for Sample-Efficient RL with Resets and Linear Value Approximation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › sample efficiency
sample-efficient reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Few Expert Queries Suffices for Sample-Efficient RL with Resets and Linear Value Approximation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › value function approximation
linear value function approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A Few Expert Queries Suffices for Sample-Efficient RL with Resets and Linear Value Approximation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function approximation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | A Few Expert Queries Suffices for Sample-Efficient RL with Resets and Linear Value Approximation · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
speculative sampling · 0.9interleaved sampling · 0.9lower bound analysis · 0.6linear value approximation · 0.6expert queries · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Speculative Knowledge Distillation: Bridging the Teacher-Student Gap Through Interleaved SamplingabstractRecent advances in knowledge distillation (KD) have enabled smaller student models to approach the performance of larger teacher models. However, popular methods such as supervised KD and on-policy KD, are adversely impacted by the knowledge gaps between teacher-student in practical scenarios. Supervised KD suffers from a distribution mismatch between training with a static dataset and inference over final student-generated outputs. Conversely, on-policy KD, which uses student-generated samples for training, can suffer from low-quality training examples with which teacher models are not familiar, resulting in inaccurate teacher feedback. To address these limitations, we introduce Speculative Knowledge Distillation (SKD), a novel approach that leverages cooperation between student and teacher models to generate high-quality training data on-the-fly while aligning with the student's inference-time distribution. In SKD, the student proposes tokens, and the teacher replaces poorly ranked ones based on its own distribution, transferring high-quality knowledge adaptively. We evaluate SKD on various text generation tasks, including translation, summarization, math, and instruction following, and show that SKD consistently outperforms existing KD methods across different domains, data sizes, and model initialization strategies. Wenda Xu, Rujun Han, Zifeng Wang 0002, Long T. Le, Dhruv Madeka, Lei Li 0005, William Yang Wang, Rishabh Agarwal, Chen-Yu Lee, Tomas Pfister |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2024 | A Study on the Calibration of In-context LearningabstractHanlin Zhang, YiFan Zhang, Yaodong Yu, Dhruv Madeka, Dean Foster, Eric Xing, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Sham Kakade. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Hanlin Zhang 0002, Yifan Zhang 0004, Yaodong Yu, Dhruv Madeka, Dean P. Foster, Eric P. Xing, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Sham M. Kakade |
NAACL-HLT | 4 |
| 2023 | Linear Reinforcement Learning with Ball Structure Action SpaceabstractWe study the problem of Reinforcement Learning (RL) with linear function approximation, i.e. assuming the optimal action-value function is linear in a known $d$-dimensional feature mapping. Unfortunately, however, based on only this assumption, the worst case sample complexity has been shown to be exponential, even under a generative model. Instead of making further assumptions on the MDP or value functions, we assume that our action space is such that there always exist playable actions to explore any direction of the feature space. We formalize this assumption as a “ball structure” action space, and show that being able to freely explore the feature space allows for efficient RL. In particular, we propose a sample-efficient RL algorithm (BallRL) that learns an $\epsilon$-optimal policy using only $\tilde{\mathcal{O}}\left(\frac{H^5d^3}{\epsilon^3}\right)$ number of trajectories. Zeyu Jia, Randy Jia, Dhruv Madeka, Dean P. Foster |
ALT | 3 |
| 2022 | A Few Expert Queries Suffices for Sample-Efficient RL with Resets and Linear Value ApproximationabstractThe current paper studies sample-efficient Reinforcement Learning (RL) in settings where only the optimal value function is assumed to be linearly-realizable. It has recently been understood that, even under this seemingly strong assumption and access to a generative model, worst-case sample complexities can be prohibitively (i.e., exponentially) large. We investigate the setting where the learner additionally has access to interactive demonstrations from an expert policy, and we present a statistically and computationally efficient algorithm (Delphi) for blending exploration with expert queries. In particular, Delphi requires $\tilde O(d)$ expert queries and a $\texttt{poly}(d,H,|A|,1/\varepsilon)$ amount of exploratory samples to provably recover an $\varepsilon$-suboptimal policy. Compared to pure RL approaches, this corresponds to an exponential improvement in sample complexity with surprisingly-little expert input. Compared to prior imitation learning (IL) approaches, our required number of expert demonstrations is independent of $H$ and logarithmic in $1/\varepsilon$, whereas all prior work required at least linear factors of both in addition to the same dependence on $d$. Towards establishing the minimal amount of expert queries needed, we show that, in the same setting, any learner whose exploration budget is \textit{polynomially-bounded} (in terms of $d,H,$ and $|A|$) will require \textit{at least} $\tilde\Omega(\sqrt{d})$ oracle calls to recover a policy competing with the expert's value function. Under the weaker assumption that the expert's policy is linear, we show that the lower bound increases to $\tilde\Omega(d)$. Philip Amortila, Nan Jiang 0008, Dhruv Madeka, Dean P. Foster |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2017 | Scatteract: Automated Extraction of Data from Scatter Plots
Mathieu Cliche, David S. Rosenberg, Dhruv Madeka, Connie Yee |
ECML/PKDD (1) | 3 |