Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hiroaki Mikami

dblp:199/2982 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
User interface design and tools
programming environments
0.312017
Micro-Versioning Tool to Support Experimentation in Exploratory Programming · CHI 2017
User interface design and tools › developer tools
version control
0.312017
Micro-Versioning Tool to Support Experimentation in Exploratory Programming · CHI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.6undo model · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 A Scaling Law for Syn2real Transfer: How Much Is Your Pre-training Effective?
Hiroaki Mikami, Kenji Fukumizu, Shogo Murai, Shuji Suzuki, Yuta Kikuchi, Taiji Suzuki, Shin-ichi Maeda, Kohei Hayashi
ECML/PKDD (3)1
2017 Micro-Versioning Tool to Support Experimentation in Exploratory Programming
abstract
Experimentation plays an essential role in exploratory programming, and programmers apply version control operations when switching the part of the source code back to the past state during experimentation. However, these operations, which we refer to as micro-versioning, are not well supported in current programming environments. We first examined previous studies to clarify the requirements for a micro-versioning tool. We then developed a micro-versioning tool that displays visual cues representing possible micro-versioning operations in a textual code editor. Our tool includes a history model that generates meaningful candidates by combining a regional undo model and tree-structured undo model. The history model uses code executions as a delimiter to segment text edit operations into meaning groups. A user study involving programmers indicated that our tool satisfies the above-mentioned requirements and that it is useful for exploratory programming.
Hiroaki Mikami, Daisuke Sakamoto, Takeo Igarashi
CHI1