Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jennifer O. Burrell
dblp:199/2983
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing
civic engagement |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Empowered Participation: How Citizens Use Technology in Local Governance · CHI 2017 |
Collaborative and social computing › civic engagement
civic technology |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Empowered Participation: How Citizens Use Technology in Local Governance · CHI 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
longitudinal study · 0.3ethnographic study · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Empowered Participation: How Citizens Use Technology in Local GovernanceabstractThe partnership between local residents and city officials to inform policy and decision-making about government resources, or participatory governance, has been extensively studied. In addition to numerous ethnographic studies about how citizens engage in-person, there has been increased focus in HCI to understand the impact of technology on citizen participation in local governance. Building upon those studies, this paper provides unique insight from a 3-year longitudinal study on the use of online tools that were organically adapted by citizens to engage in local governance in three diverse Chicago neighborhoods. Though the responsiveness of government officials varied across communities, our results suggest that citizens use technology to heighten the visibility of their concerns, to support mechanisms of government accountability, and to provide various options for resident participation in local governance. We argue that while communities may be effective in their use of ICTs, technology may not increase their political power. Sheena Lewis Erete, Jennifer O. Burrell |
CHI | 2 |