Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yilin Niu
dblp:199/3657
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 4 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Language models and text generation · 29% Reinforcement learning · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 15% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › capability evaluation
instruction-following evaluation |
2.0 | 2 | 2026 | IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following Evaluation · ACL (1) 2026 IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following Evaluation · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data-efficient learning |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Data Efficient RLVR via Off-Policy Influence Guidance · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Data Efficient RLVR via Off-Policy Influence Guidance · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reward design
reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Data Efficient RLVR via Off-Policy Influence Guidance · ACL (1) 2026 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization › long-context modeling
long-context language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LongReward: Improving Long-context Large Language Models with AI Feedback · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback › preference-based reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from AI feedback |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LongReward: Improving Long-context Large Language Models with AI Feedback · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment · ICML 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › reasoning-based question answering
commonsense question answering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Semantic-based Method for Unsupervised Commonsense Question Answering · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Semantic-based Method for Unsupervised Commonsense Question Answering · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
evidence extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Self-Training Method for Machine Reading Comprehension with Soft Evidence Extraction · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
machine reading comprehension |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Self-Training Method for Machine Reading Comprehension with Soft Evidence Extraction · ACL 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain adaptation › unsupervised domain adaptation
self-training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Self-Training Method for Machine Reading Comprehension with Soft Evidence Extraction · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
lexical semantics |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Improved Word Representation Learning with Sememes · ACL (1) 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Improved Word Representation Learning with Sememes · ACL (1) 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
off-policy influence estimation · 1.0fine-grained evaluation · 1.0benchmark construction · 1.0reward modeling · 0.9AI feedback · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.8direct preference optimization · 0.8semantic similarity · 0.5knowledge base retrieval · 0.5pseudo-labeling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | IF-CRITIC: Towards a Fine-Grained LLM Critic for Instruction-Following EvaluationabstractBosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Pei Ke, Xiaoying Ling, Ying Zhang, Aohan Zeng, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Pei Ke, Xiaoying Ling, Aohan Zeng, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2026 | IF-RewardBench: Benchmarking Judge Models for Instruction-Following EvaluationabstractBosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Xiaoying Ling, Ying Zhang, Pei Ke, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Bosi Wen, Yilin Niu, Cunxiang Wang, Xiaoying Ling, Pei Ke, Hongning Wang, Minlie Huang |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2026 | Data Efficient RLVR via Off-Policy Influence GuidanceabstractErle Zhu, Dazhi Jiang, Yuan Wang, Xujun Li, Jiale Cheng, Yuxian Gu, Yilin Niu, Aohan Zeng, Jie Tang, Minlie Huang, Hongning Wang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026. Erle Zhu, Dazhi Jiang, Xujun Li, Yuxian Gu, Yilin Niu, Aohan Zeng, Jie Tang 0001, Minlie Huang, Hongning Wang |
ACL (1) | 7 |
| 2025 | LongReward: Improving Long-context Large Language Models with AI FeedbackabstractJiajie Zhang, Zhongni Hou, Xin Lv, Shulin Cao, Zhenyu Hou, Yilin Niu, Lei Hou, Yuxiao Dong, Ling Feng, Juanzi Li. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Zhongni Hou, Shulin Cao, Yilin Niu, Lei Hou 0001, Yuxiao Dong, Juan-Zi Li |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2024 | Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model AlignmentabstractThe alignment of language models with human preferences is vital for their application in real-world tasks. The problem is formulated as optimizing the model's policy to maximize the expected reward that reflects human preferences with minimal deviation from the initial policy. While considered as a straightforward solution, reinforcement learning (RL) suffers from high variance in policy updates, which impedes efficient policy improvement. Recently, direct preference optimization (DPO) was proposed to directly optimize the policy from preference data. However, we show that DPO derived based on the optimal solution of the problem leads to a compromised mean-seeking approximation of the optimal solution in practice. In this paper, we propose efficient exact optimization (EXO) of the alignment objective. EXO is guaranteed to optimize in the same direction as RL algorithms asymptotically for arbitrary policy parametrization. This leads to the same mode-seeking solution, while enables efficient optimization by circumventing the complexities of RL. We also compare our method to DPO with both theoretical and empirical analyses, and further demonstrate the advantages of our method over existing approaches on realistic human preference data. Code is available at https://github.com/haozheji/exact-optimization. Haozhe Ji, Cheng Lu 0011, Yilin Niu, Pei Ke, Hongning Wang, Jun Zhu 0001, Jie Tang 0001, Minlie Huang |
ICML | 3 |
| 2023 | Bridging the Gap between Synthetic and Natural Questions via Sentence Decomposition for Semantic ParsingabstractAbstract Semantic parsing maps natural language questions into logical forms, which can be executed against a knowledge base for answers. In real-world applications, the performance of a parser is often limited by the lack of training data. To facilitate zero-shot learning, data synthesis has been widely studied to automatically generate paired questions and logical forms. However, data synthesis methods can hardly cover the diverse structures in natural languages, leading to a large gap in sentence structure between synthetic and natural questions. In this paper, we propose a decomposition-based method to unify the sentence structures of questions, which benefits the generalization to natural questions. Experiments demonstrate that our method significantly improves the semantic parser trained on synthetic data (+7.9% on KQA and +8.9% on ComplexWebQuestions in terms of exact match accuracy). Extensive analysis demonstrates that our method can better generalize to natural questions with novel text expressions compared with baselines. Besides semantic parsing, our idea potentially benefits other semantic understanding tasks by mitigating the distracting structure features. To illustrate this, we extend our method to the task of sentence embedding learning, and observe substantial improvements on sentence retrieval (+13.1% for Hit@1). Yilin Niu, Fei Huang 0005, Wei Liu 0005, Jianwei Cui 0002, Bin Wang 0004, Minlie Huang |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2021 | A Semantic-based Method for Unsupervised Commonsense Question AnsweringabstractYilin Niu, Fei Huang, Jiaming Liang, Wenkai Chen, Xiaoyan Zhu, Minlie Huang. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Yilin Niu, Fei Huang 0005, Xiaoyan Zhu 0001, Minlie Huang |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | A Self-Training Method for Machine Reading Comprehension with Soft Evidence ExtractionabstractNeural models have achieved great success on machine reading comprehension (MRC), many of which typically consist of two components: an evidence extractor and an answer predictor.The former seeks the most relevant information from a reference text, while the latter is to locate or generate answers from the extracted evidence.Despite the importance of evidence labels for training the evidence extractor, they are not cheaply accessible, particularly in many non-extractive MRC tasks such as YES/NO question answering and multi-choice MRC.To address this problem, we present a Self-Training method (STM), which supervises the evidence extractor with auto-generated evidence labels in an iterative process.At each iteration, a base MRC model is trained with golden answers and noisy evidence labels.The trained model will predict pseudo evidence labels as extra supervision in the next iteration.We evaluate STM on seven datasets over three MRC tasks.Experimental results demonstrate the improvement on existing MRC models, and we also analyze how and why such a self-training method works in MRC. Yilin Niu, Fangkai Jiao, Mantong Zhou, Jingfang Xu, Minlie Huang |
ACL | 1 |
| 2017 | Improved Word Representation Learning with SememesabstractSememes are minimum semantic units of word meanings, and the meaning of each word sense is typically composed by several sememes.Since sememes are not explicit for each word, people manually annotate word sememes and form linguistic common-sense knowledge bases.In this paper, we present that, word sememe information can improve word representation learning (WRL), which maps words into a low-dimensional semantic space and serves as a fundamental step for many NLP tasks.The key idea is to utilize word sememes to capture exact meanings of a word within specific contexts accurately.More specifically, we follow the framework of Skip-gram and present three sememe-encoded models to learn representations of sememes, senses and words, where we apply the attention scheme to detect word senses in various contexts.We conduct experiments on two tasks including word similarity and word analogy, and our models significantly outperform baselines.The results indicate that WRL can benefit from sememes via the attention scheme, and also confirm our models being capable of correctly modeling sememe information. Yilin Niu, Ruobing Xie, Zhiyuan Liu 0001, Maosong Sun 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |