Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhongli Li

dblp:199/3893 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-0602-2599ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 85% Generative modeling · 15%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text correction
0.812024
Towards Real-World Writing Assistance: A Chinese Character Checking Benchmark with Faked and Misspelled Characters · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
dataset refinement
0.412020
Harvesting and Refining Question-Answer Pairs for Unsupervised QA · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Generative modeling
iterative refinement
0.412020
Harvesting and Refining Question-Answer Pairs for Unsupervised QA · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
unsupervised question answering
0.412020
Harvesting and Refining Question-Answer Pairs for Unsupervised QA · ACL 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

human annotation · 0.8benchmark construction · 0.8BERT fine-tuning · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Towards Real-World Writing Assistance: A Chinese Character Checking Benchmark with Faked and Misspelled Characters
abstract
Yinghui Li, Zishan Xu, Shaoshen Chen, Haojing Huang, Yangning Li, Shirong Ma, Yong Jiang, Zhongli Li, Qingyu Zhou, Hai-Tao Zheng, Ying Shen. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Zishan Xu, Shaoshen Chen, Haojing Huang 0001, Yangning Li, Shirong Ma, Yong Jiang 0001, Zhongli Li, Qingyu Zhou, Hai-Tao Zheng 0002, Ying Shen 0001
ACL (1)8
2022 AiM: Taking Answers in Mind to Correct Chinese Cloze Tests in Educational Applications
abstract
To automatically correct handwritten assignments, the traditional approach is to use an OCR model to recognize characters and compare them to answers. The OCR model easily gets confused on recognizing handwritten Chinese characters, and the textual information of the answers is missing during the model inference. However, teachers always have these answers in mind to review and correct assignments. In this paper, we focus on the Chinese cloze tests correction and propose a multimodal approach(named AiM). The encoded representations of answers interact with the visual information of students’ handwriting. Instead of predicting ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, we perform the sequence labeling on the answer text to infer which answer character differs from the handwritten content in a fine-grained way. We take samples of OCR datasets as the positive samples for this task, and develop a negative sample augmentation method to scale up the training data. Experimental results show that AiM outperforms OCR-based methods by a large margin. Extensive studies demonstrate the effectiveness of our multimodal approach.
Zhongli Li, Qingyu Zhou, Chao Li 0063, Mina Ma, Yunbo Cao, Hongzhi Liu 0001
COLING2
2020 Harvesting and Refining Question-Answer Pairs for Unsupervised QA
abstract
Question Answering (QA) has shown great success thanks to the availability of largescale datasets and the effectiveness of neural models.Recent research works have attempted to extend these successes to the settings with few or no labeled data available.In this work, we introduce two approaches to improve unsupervised QA.First, we harvest lexically and syntactically divergent questions from Wikipedia to automatically construct a corpus of question-answer pairs (named as REFQA).Second, we take advantage of the QA model to extract more appropriate answers, which iteratively refines data over RE-FQA.We conduct experiments 1 on SQuAD 1.1, and NewsQA by fine-tuning BERT without access to manually annotated data.Our approach outperforms previous unsupervised approaches by a large margin and is competitive with early supervised models.We also show the effectiveness of our approach in the fewshot learning setting.
Zhongli Li, Wenhui Wang 0003, Li Dong 0004, Furu Wei, Ke Xu 0001
ACL1
2017 City digital pulse: a cloud based heterogeneous data analysis platform
Zhongli Li, Shiai Zhu, Huiwen Hong, Abdulmotaleb El Saddik
Multim. Tools Appl.1