EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yuliya Marchetti
dblp:199/3927
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Robot navigation and mapping · 49% Legged, aerial and field robots · 26% 3D vision · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
terrain classification |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deepening the Sense of Touch in Planetary Exploration with Geometric and Topological Deep Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
planetary exploration |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Barefoot Rover: a Sensor-Embedded Rover Wheel Demonstrating In-Situ Engineering and Science Extractions using Machine Learning · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › terrain perception
terrain estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Barefoot Rover: a Sensor-Embedded Rover Wheel Demonstrating In-Situ Engineering and Science Extractions using Machine Learning · ICRA 2020 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › field robotics
planetary rover |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Deepening the Sense of Touch in Planetary Exploration with Geometric and Topological Deep Learning · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
convolutional neural network · 1.1topological data analysis · 0.6persistence-based attention · 0.6topological deep learning · 0.5geometric deep learning · 0.5pressure sensing · 0.4machine learning · 0.4electrochemical impedance spectroscopy · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | TCN: Pioneering Topological-Based Convolutional Networks for Planetary Terrain LearningabstractImplementations of artificial intelligence (AI) based on deep learning (DL) have proven to be highly successful in many domains, from biomedical imaging to natural language processing, but are still rarely applied in the space industry, particularly for onboard learning of planetary surfaces. In this project, we discuss the utility and limitations of DL, enhanced with topological footprints of the sensed objects, for multi-class classification of planetary surface patterns, in conjunction with tactile and embedded sensing in rover exploratory missions. We consider a Topological Convolutional Network (TCN) model with a persistence-based attention mechanism for supervised classification of various landforms. We study TCN's performance on the Barefoot surface pattern dataset, a novel surface pressure dataset from a prototype tactile rover wheel, known as the Barefoot Rover tactile wheel. Multi-class pattern recognition in the Barefoot data has neither been ever tackled before with DL nor assessed with topological methods. We provide insights into advantages and restrictions of topological DL as the early-stage concept for onboard learning and planetary exploration. Yuliya Marchetti, Elena Sizikova, Yulia R. Gel |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2021 | Deepening the Sense of Touch in Planetary Exploration with Geometric and Topological Deep LearningabstractTactile and embedded sensing is a new concept that has recently appeared in the context of rovers and planetary exploration missions. Various sensors such as those measuring pressure and integrated directly on wheels have the potential to add a "sense of touch" to exploratory vehicles. We investigate the utility of deep learning (DL), from conventional Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) to emerging geometric and topological DL, to terrain classification for planetary exploration based on a novel dataset from an experimental tactile wheel concept. The dataset includes 2D conductivity images from a pressure sensor array, which is wrapped around a rover wheel and is able to read pressure signatures of the ground beneath the wheel. Neither newer nor traditional DL tools have been previously applied to tactile sensing data. We discuss insights into advantages and limitations of these methods for the analysis of non-traditional pressure images and their potential use in planetary surface science. Yuliya Marchetti, Yulia R. Gel |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2020 | Barefoot Rover: a Sensor-Embedded Rover Wheel Demonstrating In-Situ Engineering and Science Extractions using Machine LearningabstractIn this work, we demonstrate an instrumented wheel concept which utilizes a 2D pressure grid, an electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) sensor and machine learning (ML) to extract meaningful metrics from the interaction between the wheel and surface terrain. These include continuous slip/skid estimation, balance, and sharpness for engineering applications. Estimates of surface hydration, texture, terrain patterns, and regolith physical properties such as cohesion and angle of internal friction are additionally calculated for science applications. Traditional systems rely on post-processing of visual images and vehicle telemetry to estimate these metrics. Through in-situ sensing, these metrics can be calculated in near real time and made available to onboard science and engineering autonomy applications. This work aims to provide a deployable system for future planetary exploration missions to increase science and engineering capabilities through increased knowledge of the terrain. Yuliya Marchetti, Jack Lightholder, Eric Junkins, Matthew Cross 0004, Lukas Mandrake, Abigail A. Fraeman |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2020 | OCO-2 Calibration Refinement Across Versions and Plans for OCO-3abstractThe third major reprocessing campaign for the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 mission is underway. With each release, several aspects of instrument calibration were improved. An onboard lamp tracks relative gain degradation, but ages too quickly to track absolute scaling. The most significant changes between builds were evolving assumptions about the stability of the solar calibrator. For the newest build, the trend in lunar measurements over a 4.5-year time series was applied. Another significant change was to expand a list of detector outliers via review of dark, lamp, and science measurements. More subtle adjustments to stray light and spectral dispersion were also performed. The techniques developed for OCO-2 are being applied to the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 3, which completed in-orbit checkout in August 2019. OCO-3 does not have a solar calibrator, and will need to constrain lamp aging via secondary lamps and comparison to other satellites. Robert Rosenberg, Lars Chapsky, David Crisp, Graziela R. Keller, Richard A. Lee 0002, Yuliya Marchetti, Annmarie Eldering |
IGARSS | 6 |