Large datasets of hundreds to thousands of individuals measuring RNA-seq in observational studies are becoming available. Many popular software packages for analysis of RNA-seq data were constructed to study differences in expression signatures in an experimental design with well-defined conditions (exposures). In contrast, observational studies may have varying levels of confounding transcript-exposure associations; further, exposure measures may vary from discrete (exposed, yes/no) to continuous (levels of exposure), with non-normal distributions of exposure. We compare popular software for gene expression-DESeq2, edgeR and limma-as well as linear regression-based analyses for studying the association of continuous exposures with RNA-seq. We developed a computation pipeline that includes transformation, filtering and generation of empirical null distribution of association P-values, and we apply the pipeline to compute empirical P-values with multiple testing correction. We employ a resampling approach that allows for assessment of false positive detection across methods, power comparison and the computation of quantile empirical P-values. The results suggest that linear regression methods are substantially faster with better control of false detections than other methods, even with the resampling method to compute empirical P-values. We provide the proposed pipeline with fast algorithms in an R package Olivia, and implemented it to study the associations of measures of sleep disordered breathing with RNA-seq in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in participants from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis.

Motivation: Capturing association patterns in gene expression levels under different conditions or time points is important for inferring gene regulatory interactions. In practice, temporal changes in gene expression may result in complex association patterns that require more sophisticated detection methods than simple correlation measures. For instance, the effect of regulation may lead to time-lagged associations and interactions local to a subset of samples. Furthermore, expression profiles of interest may not be aligned or directly comparable (e.g. gene expression profiles from two species). Results: We propose a count statistic for measuring association between pairs of gene expression profiles consisting of ordered samples (e.g. time-course), where correlation may only exist locally in subsequences separated by a position shift. The statistic is simple and fast to compute, and we illustrate its use in two applications. In a cross-species comparison of developmental gene expression levels, we show our method not only measures association of gene expressions between the two species, but also provides alignment between different developmental stages. In the second application, we applied our statistic to expression profiles from two distinct phenotypic conditions, where the samples in each profile are ordered by the associated phenotypic values. The detected associations can be useful in building correspondence between gene association networks under different phenotypes. On the theoretical side, we provide asymptotic distributions of the statistic for different regions of the parameter space and test its power on simulated data. Availability and implementation: The code used to perform the analysis is available as part of the Supplementary Material. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.