Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Laura Onasch-Vera
dblp:199/6802
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Computational social science and digital humanities · 62% Medical and health informatics · 38% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Medical and health informatics › drug development
clinical trial |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Clinical Trial of an AI-Augmented Intervention for HIV Prevention in Youth Experiencing Homelessness · AAAI 2021 |
Computational social science and digital humanities › social network analysis › information diffusion
influence maximization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Clinical Trial of an AI-Augmented Intervention for HIV Prevention in Youth Experiencing Homelessness · AAAI 2021 |
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network intervention |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Clinical Trial of an AI-Augmented Intervention for HIV Prevention in Youth Experiencing Homelessness · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › influence maximization
social influence maximization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice in Influence Maximization: Raising Awareness about HIV among Homeless Youth · IJCAI 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
influence maximization · 0.7POMDP planning · 0.7social network optimization · 0.5randomized controlled trial · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Clinical Trial of an AI-Augmented Intervention for HIV Prevention in Youth Experiencing HomelessnessabstractYouth experiencing homelessness (YEH) are subject to substantially greater risk of HIV infection, compounded both by their lack of access to stable housing and the disproportionate representation of youth of marginalized racial, ethnic, and gender identity groups among YEH. A key goal for health equity is to improve adoption of protective behaviors in this population. One promising strategy for intervention is to recruit peer leaders from the population of YEH to promote behaviors such as condom usage and regular HIV testing to their social contacts. This raises a computational question: which youth should be selected as peer leaders to maximize the overall impact of the intervention? We developed an artificial intelligence system to optimize such social network interventions in a community health setting. We conducted a clinical trial enrolling 713 YEH at drop-in centers in a large US city. The clinical trial compared interventions planned with the algorithm to those where the highest-degree nodes in the youths' social network were recruited as peer leaders (the standard method in public health) and to an observation-only control group. Results from the clinical trial show that youth in the AI group experience statistically significant reductions in key risk behaviors for HIV transmission, while those in the other groups do not. This provides, to our knowledge, the first empirical validation of the usage of AI methods to optimize social network interventions for health. We conclude by discussing lessons learned over the course of the project which may inform future attempts to use AI in community-level interventions. Bryan Wilder, Laura Onasch-Vera, Graham T. DiGuiseppi, Robin Petering, Chyna Hill, Amulya Yadav, Eric Rice, Milind Tambe |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2018 | Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Practice in Influence Maximization: Raising Awareness about HIV among Homeless YouthabstractThis paper reports on results obtained by deploying HEALER and DOSIM (two AI agents for social influence maximization) in the real-world, which assist service providers in maximizing HIV awareness in real-world homeless-youth social networks. These agents recommend key "seed" nodes in social networks, i.e., homeless youth who would maximize HIV awareness in their real-world social network. While prior research on these agents published promising simulation results from the lab, the usability of these AI agents in the real-world was unknown. This paper presents results from three real-world pilot studies involving 173 homeless youth across two different homeless shelters in Los Angeles. The results from these pilot studies illustrate that HEALER and DOSIM outperform the current modus operandi of service providers by ~160% in terms of information spread about HIV among homeless youth. Amulya Yadav, Bryan Wilder, Eric Rice, Robin Petering, Jaih Craddock, Amanda Yoshioka-Maxwell, Mary Hemler, Laura Onasch-Vera, Milind Tambe, Darlene Woo |
IJCAI | 8 |