Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Anshuman Chhabra

dblp:199/8940 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
13ranked-venue papers
6as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 6 first-author · 8 since 2021Computer networks · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 49% Efficient and distributed learning · 43% Language models and text generation · 7%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 50% Information retrieval · 43% Web and social media mining · 6%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 26, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial attack
adversarial clustering
1.022022
On the Robustness of Deep Clustering Models: Adversarial Attacks and Defenses · NeurIPS 2022
Suspicion-Free Adversarial Attacks on Clustering Algorithms · AAAI 2020
Data mining
clustering
1.022022
On the Robustness of Deep Clustering Models: Adversarial Attacks and Defenses · NeurIPS 2022
Suspicion-Free Adversarial Attacks on Clustering Algorithms · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.922024
Robust Fair Clustering: A Novel Fairness Attack and Defense Framework · ICLR 2023
"What Data Benefits My Classifier?" Enhancing Model Performance and Interpretability through Influence-Based Data Selection · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data-centric learning
0.912025
Outlier Gradient Analysis: Efficiently Identifying Detrimental Training Samples for Deep Learning Models · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model
0.912025
LayerIF: Estimating Layer Quality for Large Language Models using Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › pruning › transformer pruning
large language model pruning
0.912025
LayerIF: Estimating Layer Quality for Large Language Models using Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › sparsity
layer-wise sparsity
0.912025
LayerIF: Estimating Layer Quality for Large Language Models using Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.912025
LayerIF: Estimating Layer Quality for Large Language Models using Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning
0.912025
LayerIF: Estimating Layer Quality for Large Language Models using Influence Functions · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
training data attribution
0.912025
Outlier Gradient Analysis: Efficiently Identifying Detrimental Training Samples for Deep Learning Models · ICML 2025
Information retrieval
ranking
0.912025
Re-ranking Using Large Language Models for Mitigating Exposure to Harmful Content on Social Media Platforms · ACL (1) 2025
Information retrieval
reranking
0.912025
Re-ranking Using Large Language Models for Mitigating Exposure to Harmful Content on Social Media Platforms · ACL (1) 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
data valuation
0.812024
"What Data Benefits My Classifier?" Enhancing Model Performance and Interpretability through Influence-Based Data Selection · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
influence-based data selection
0.812024
"What Data Benefits My Classifier?" Enhancing Model Performance and Interpretability through Influence-Based Data Selection · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fair unsupervised learning
fair clustering
0.712023
Robust Fair Clustering: A Novel Fairness Attack and Defense Framework · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.612022
On the Robustness of Deep Clustering Models: Adversarial Attacks and Defenses · NeurIPS 2022
Data mining › clustering
deep clustering
0.612022
On the Robustness of Deep Clustering Models: Adversarial Attacks and Defenses · NeurIPS 2022
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.612022
On the Robustness of Deep Clustering Models: Adversarial Attacks and Defenses · NeurIPS 2022
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
black-box attack
0.612022
On the Robustness of Deep Clustering Models: Adversarial Attacks and Defenses · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack
0.412020
Suspicion-Free Adversarial Attacks on Clustering Algorithms · AAAI 2020
Data mining › clustering
k-means clustering
0.412020
Suspicion-Free Adversarial Attacks on Clustering Algorithms · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.422024
"What Data Benefits My Classifier?" Enhancing Model Performance and Interpretability through Influence-Based Data Selection · ICLR 2024
Robust Fair Clustering: A Novel Fairness Attack and Defense Framework · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
content moderation
0.312025
Re-ranking Using Large Language Models for Mitigating Exposure to Harmful Content on Social Media Platforms · ACL (1) 2025
Web and social media mining › content moderation
harmful content detection
0.312025
Re-ranking Using Large Language Models for Mitigating Exposure to Harmful Content on Social Media Platforms · ACL (1) 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

black-box attack · 2.6large language model · 1.7influence functions · 1.7generative adversarial network · 1.1validation loss sensitivity · 0.9outlier gradient analysis · 0.9layer-wise gradient · 0.9hessian-free formulation · 0.9influence estimation · 0.8convex surrogate modeling · 0.8adversarial attack · 0.7spill-over perturbation · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Re-ranking Using Large Language Models for Mitigating Exposure to Harmful Content on Social Media Platforms
abstract
Rajvardhan Oak, Muhammad Haroon, Claire Wonjeong Jo, Magdalena Wojcieszak, Anshuman Chhabra. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Rajvardhan Oak, Claire Wonjeong Jo, Magdalena Wojcieszak, Anshuman Chhabra
ACL (1)5
2025 Outlier Gradient Analysis: Efficiently Identifying Detrimental Training Samples for Deep Learning Models
abstract
A core data-centric learning challenge is the identification of training samples that are detrimental to model performance. Influence functions serve as a prominent tool for this task and offer a robust framework for assessing training data influence on model predictions. Despite their widespread use, their high computational cost associated with calculating the inverse of the Hessian matrix pose constraints, particularly when analyzing large-sized deep models. In this paper, we establish a bridge between identifying detrimental training samples via influence functions and outlier gradient detection. This transformation not only presents a straightforward and Hessian-free formulation but also provides insights into the role of the gradient in sample impact. Through systematic empirical evaluations, we first validate the hypothesis of our proposed outlier gradient analysis approach on synthetic datasets. We then demonstrate its effectiveness in detecting mislabeled samples in vision models and selecting data samples for improving performance of natural language processing transformer models. We also extend its use to influential sample identification for fine-tuning Large Language Models.
Anshuman Chhabra, Jian Chen 0016, Prasant Mohapatra, Hongfu Liu 0001
ICML1
2025 Rethinking Reasoning in LLMs: Neuro-Symbolic Local RetoMaton Beyond CoT and ICL
abstract
Prompt-based reasoning strategies such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) and In-Context Learning (ICL) have become widely used for eliciting reasoning capabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs). However, these methods rely on fragile, implicit mechanisms often yielding inconsistent outputs across seeds, formats, or minor prompt variations making them fundamentally unreliable for tasks requiring stable, interpretable reasoning. In contrast, automata-based neuro-symbolic frameworks like RetoMaton offer a more structured and trustworthy alternative by grounding retrieval in symbolic memory with deterministic transitions. In this work, we extend RetoMaton by replacing its global datastore with a local, task-adaptive Weighted Finite Automaton (WFA), constructed directly from external domain corpora. This local automaton structure promotes robust, context-aware retrieval while preserving symbolic traceability and low inference overhead. Unlike prompting, which entangles context and memory in opaque ways, our approach leverages the explicit structure of WFAs to provide verifiable and modular retrieval behavior, making it better suited for domain transfer and interoperability. We evaluate this local RetoMaton variant on two pretrained LLMs LLaMA-3.2-1B and Gemma-3-1B-PT across three reasoning tasks: TriviaQA (reading comprehension), GSM8K (multi-step math), and MMLU (domain knowledge). Compared to the base model and prompting-based methods, augmenting these setups with local RetoMaton consistently improves performance while enabling transparent and reproducible retrieval dynamics. Our results highlight a promising shift toward trustworthy, symbolic reasoning in modern LLMs via lightweight, automaton-guided memory.
Rushitha Santhoshi Mamidala, Anshuman Chhabra, Ankur Mali
NeSy2
2025 LayerIF: Estimating Layer Quality for Large Language Models using Influence Functions
abstract
Pretrained Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve strong performance across a wide range of tasks, yet exhibit substantial variability in the various layers' training quality with respect to specific downstream applications, limiting their downstream performance. It is therefore critical to estimate layer-wise training quality in a manner that accounts for both model architecture and training data. However, existing approaches predominantly rely on model-centric heuristics (such as spectral statistics, outlier detection, or uniform allocation) while overlooking the influence of data. To address these limitations, we propose **LayerIF**, a data-driven framework that leverages *Influence Functions* to quantify the training quality of individual layers in a principled and task-sensitive manner. By isolating each layer's gradients and measuring the sensitivity of the validation loss to training examples by computing layer-wise influences, we derive data-driven estimates of layer importance. Notably, our method produces *task-specific* layer importance estimates for the *same* LLM, revealing how layers specialize for different test-time evaluation tasks. We demonstrate the utility of our scores by leveraging them for two downstream applications: (a) expert allocation in LoRA-MoE architectures and (b) layer-wise sparsity distribution for LLM pruning. Experiments across multiple LLM architectures demonstrate that our model-agnostic, influence-guided allocation leads to consistent gains in task performance.
Hadi Askari, Shivanshu Gupta, Fei Wang 0060, Anshuman Chhabra, Muhao Chen 0001
NeurIPS4
2024 "What Data Benefits My Classifier?" Enhancing Model Performance and Interpretability through Influence-Based Data Selection
abstract
Classification models are ubiquitously deployed in society and necessitate high utility, fairness, and robustness performance. Current research efforts mainly focus on improving model architectures and learning algorithms on fixed datasets to achieve this goal. In contrast, in this paper, we address an orthogonal yet crucial problem: given a fixed convex learning model (or a convex surrogate for a non-convex model) and a function of interest, we assess what data benefits the model by interpreting the feature space, and then aim to improve performance as measured by this function. To this end, we propose the use of influence estimation models for interpreting the classifier's performance from the perspective of the data feature space. Additionally, we propose data selection approaches based on influence that enhance model utility, fairness, and robustness. Through extensive experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets, we validate and demonstrate the effectiveness of our approaches not only for conventional classification scenarios, but also under more challenging scenarios such as distribution shifts, fairness poisoning attacks, utility evasion attacks, online learning, and active learning.
Anshuman Chhabra, Peizhao Li, Prasant Mohapatra, Hongfu Liu 0001
ICLR1
2023 Robust Fair Clustering: A Novel Fairness Attack and Defense Framework
Anshuman Chhabra, Peizhao Li, Prasant Mohapatra, Hongfu Liu 0001
ICLR1
2022 Fair Algorithms for Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering
abstract
Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering (HAC) algorithms are extensively utilized in modern data science, and seek to partition the dataset into clusters while generating a hierarchical relationship between the data samples. HAC algorithms are employed in many applications, such as biology, natural language processing, and recommender systems. Thus, it is imperative to ensure that these algorithms are fair– even if the dataset contains biases against certain protected groups, the cluster outputs generated should not discriminate against samples from any of these groups. However, recent work in clustering fairness has mostly focused on center-based clustering algorithms, such as k-median and k-means clustering. In this paper, we propose fair algorithms for performing HAC that enforce fairness constraints 1) irrespective of the distance linkage criteria used, 2) generalize to any natural measures of clustering fairness for HAC, 3) work for multiple protected groups, and 4) have competitive running times to vanilla HAC. Through extensive experiments on multiple real-world UCI datasets, we show that our proposed algorithm finds fairer clusterings compared to vanilla HAC as well as the only other state-of-the-art fair HAC approach.
Anshuman Chhabra, Prasant Mohapatra
ICMLA1
2022 On the Robustness of Deep Clustering Models: Adversarial Attacks and Defenses
abstract
Clustering models constitute a class of unsupervised machine learning methods which are used in a number of application pipelines, and play a vital role in modern data science. With recent advancements in deep learning-- deep clustering models have emerged as the current state-of-the-art over traditional clustering approaches, especially for high-dimensional image datasets. While traditional clustering approaches have been analyzed from a robustness perspective, no prior work has investigated adversarial attacks and robustness for deep clustering models in a principled manner. To bridge this gap, we propose a blackbox attack using Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) where the adversary does not know which deep clustering model is being used, but can query it for outputs. We analyze our attack against multiple state-of-the-art deep clustering models and real-world datasets, and find that it is highly successful. We then employ some natural unsupervised defense approaches, but find that these are unable to mitigate our attack. Finally, we attack Face++, a production-level face clustering API service, and find that we can significantly reduce its performance as well. Through this work, we thus aim to motivate the need for truly robust deep clustering models.
Anshuman Chhabra, Ashwin Sekhari, Prasant Mohapatra
NeurIPS1
2020 Suspicion-Free Adversarial Attacks on Clustering Algorithms
abstract
Clustering algorithms are used in a large number of applications and play an important role in modern machine learning– yet, adversarial attacks on clustering algorithms seem to be broadly overlooked unlike supervised learning. In this paper, we seek to bridge this gap by proposing a black-box adversarial attack for clustering models for linearly separable clusters. Our attack works by perturbing a single sample close to the decision boundary, which leads to the misclustering of multiple unperturbed samples, named spill-over adversarial samples. We theoretically show the existence of such adversarial samples for the K-Means clustering. Our attack is especially strong as (1) we ensure the perturbed sample is not an outlier, hence not detectable, and (2) the exact metric used for clustering is not known to the attacker. We theoretically justify that the attack can indeed be successful without the knowledge of the true metric. We conclude by providing empirical results on a number of datasets, and clustering algorithms. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that generates spill-over adversarial samples without the knowledge of the true metric ensuring that the perturbed sample is not an outlier, and theoretically proves the above.
Anshuman Chhabra, Abhishek Roy 0005, Prasant Mohapatra
AAAI1
2020 RLProph: a dynamic programming based reinforcement learning approach for optimal routing in opportunistic IoT networks
Deepak Kumar Sharma, Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues, Vidushi Vashishth, Anirudh Khanna, Anshuman Chhabra
Wirel. Networks5
2019 A Machine Learning Approach Using Classifier Cascades for Optimal Routing in Opportunistic Internet of Things Networks
abstract
Routing in Opportunistic Internet of Things Network (OppIoT) is an involved problem, because the network is intermittently connected and source to destination end-to-end paths are non-existent. Moreover, Machine Learning (ML) has recently achieved great success in multiple domains and is now being applied to automate routing in Opportunistic Networks (OppNets) which are similar in characteristics to OppIoT, through protocols such as MLProph and KNNR. In this paper, we utilize cascade learning, a form of ensemble based ML, for improved routing in OppIoT. Through simulations we show that our proposed protocol called Cascaded Machine Learning based routing protocol (CAML), outperforms existing ML based protocols (MLProph and KNNR), and traditional well-performing protocols (HBPR and PRoPHET), on a wide range of performance metrics including message delivery probability, average hop count, packets dropped and network overhead ratio.
Vidushi Vashishth, Anshuman Chhabra, Deepak Kumar Sharma
SECON2
2019 GMMR: A Gaussian mixture model based unsupervised machine learning approach for optimal routing in opportunistic IoT networks
Vidushi Vashishth, Anshuman Chhabra, Deepak Kumar Sharma
Comput. Commun.2
2019 Understanding flows in high-speed scientific networks: A Netflow data study
Mariam Kiran, Anshuman Chhabra
Future Gener. Comput. Syst.2