Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Valentina Fedorova
dblp:20/11267
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers |
Data mining · 56% Machine learning and data management · 20% Information retrieval · 18% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Image recognition and object detection · 24% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Learning theory · 16% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning and data management
data annotation |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Practice of Efficient Data Collection via Crowdsourcing: Aggregation, Incremental Relabelling, and Pricing · WSDM 2020 Crowdsourcing Practice for Efficient Data Labeling: Aggregation, Incremental Relabeling, and Pricing · SIGMOD Conference 2020 |
Data mining › crowdsourcing
label aggregation |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Practice of Efficient Data Collection via Crowdsourcing: Aggregation, Incremental Relabelling, and Pricing · WSDM 2020 Crowdsourcing Practice for Efficient Data Labeling: Aggregation, Incremental Relabeling, and Pricing · SIGMOD Conference 2020 |
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank |
0.5 | 2 | 2016 | An Optimization Framework for Remapping and Reweighting Noisy Relevance Labels · SIGIR 2016 Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target Learning · ICML 2016 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
text recognition |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Text Recognition Using Anonymous CAPTCHA Answers · WSDM 2020 |
Data mining › crowdsourcing
crowdsourced annotation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Crowdsourcing Practice for Efficient Data Labeling: Aggregation, Incremental Relabeling, and Pricing · SIGMOD Conference 2020 |
Data mining › crowdsourcing
crowdsourced data |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Practice of Efficient Data Collection via Crowdsourcing: Aggregation, Incremental Relabelling, and Pricing · WSDM 2020 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
noisy label learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Text Recognition Using Anonymous CAPTCHA Answers · WSDM 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target Learning · ICML 2016 |
Data mining
crowdsourcing |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | An Optimization Framework for Remapping and Reweighting Noisy Relevance Labels · SIGIR 2016 |
Data integration and cleaning › data quality
label noise |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target Learning · ICML 2016 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target Learning · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validity · NIPS 2015 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
imprecise probability |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validity · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series modeling
probabilistic forecasting |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validity · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validity · NIPS 2015 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
exchangeability testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Plug-in martingales for testing exchangeability on-line · ICML 2012 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Plug-in martingales for testing exchangeability on-line · ICML 2012 |
Authentication and access control › human interactive proofs
CAPTCHA |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Text Recognition Using Anonymous CAPTCHA Answers · WSDM 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
crowdsourcing · 1.7gradient-based hyperparameter optimization · 0.5decision tree learning · 0.5sample reweighting · 0.2majority voting · 0.2label remapping · 0.2venn probability machines · 0.2calibration · 0.2online testing · 0.1martingale · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Crowdsourcing Practice for Efficient Data Labeling: Aggregation, Incremental Relabeling, and PricingabstractIn this tutorial, we present a portion of unique industry experience in efficient data labeling via crowdsourcing shared by both leading researchers and engineers from Yandex. We will make an introduction to data labeling via public crowdsourcing marketplaces and will present the key components of efficient label collection. This will be followed by a practice session, where participants will choose one of the real label collection tasks, experiment with selecting settings for the labeling process, and launch their label collection project on one of the largest crowdsourcing marketplaces. The projects will be run on real crowds within the tutorial session. While the crowd performers are annotating the project set up by the attendees, we will present the major theoretical results in efficient aggregation, incremental relabeling, and dynamic pricing. We will also discuss their strengths and weaknesses as well as applicability to real-world tasks, summarizing our five year-long research and industrial expertise in crowdsourcing. Finally, participants will receive a feedback about their projects and practical advice on how to make them more efficient. We invite beginners, advanced specialists, and researchers to learn how to collect high quality labeled data and do it efficiently. Alexey Drutsa, Valentina Fedorova, Dmitry Ustalov, Olga Megorskaya, Evfrosiniya Zerminova, Daria Baidakova |
SIGMOD Conference | 2 |
| 2020 | Practice of Efficient Data Collection via Crowdsourcing: Aggregation, Incremental Relabelling, and PricingabstractIn this tutorial, we present a portion of unique industry experience in efficient data labelling via crowdsourcing shared by both leading researchers and engineers from Yandex. We will make an introduction to data labelling via public crowdsourcing marketplaces and will present key components of efficient label collection. This will be followed by a practice session, where participants will choose one of the real label collection tasks, experiment with selecting settings for the labelling process, and launch their label collection project on Yandex.Toloka, one of the largest crowdsourcing marketplaces. The projects will be run on real crowds within the tutorial session. Finally, participants will receive a feedback about their projects and practical advice to make them more efficient. We expect that our tutorial will address an audience with a wide range of background and interests. We do not require specific prerequisite knowledge or skills. We invite beginners, advanced specialists, and researchers to learn how to efficiently collect labelled data. Alexey Drutsa, Valentina Fedorova, Dmitry Ustalov, Olga Megorskaya, Evfrosiniya Zerminova, Daria Baidakova |
WSDM | 2 |
| 2020 | Text Recognition Using Anonymous CAPTCHA AnswersabstractInternet companies use crowdsourcing to collect large amounts of data needed for creating products based on machine learning techniques. A significant source of such labels for OCR data sets is (re)CAPTCHA, which distinguishes humans from automated bots by asking them to recognize text and, at the same time, receives new labeled data in this way. An important component of such approach to data collection is the reduction of noisy labels produced by bots and non-qualified users. Alexander Shishkin, Anastasya A. Bezzubtseva, Valentina Fedorova, Alexey Drutsa, Gleb Gusev |
WSDM | 3 |
| 2016 | Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target LearningabstractLabeled training data is an essential part of any supervised machine learning framework. In practice, there is a trade-off between the quality of a label and its cost. In this paper, we consider a problem of learning to rank on a large-scale dataset with low-quality relevance labels aiming at maximizing the quality of a trained ranker on a small validation dataset with high-quality ground truth relevance labels. Motivated by the classical Gauss-Markov theorem for the linear regression problem, we formulate the problems of (1) reweighting training instances and (2) remapping learning targets. We propose meta–gradient decision tree learning framework for optimizing weight and target functions by applying gradient-based hyperparameter optimization. Experiments on a large-scale real-world dataset demonstrate that we can significantly improve state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms by incorporating our framework. Yury Ustinovskiy, Valentina Fedorova, Gleb Gusev, Pavel Serdyukov |
ICML | 2 |
| 2016 | An Optimization Framework for Remapping and Reweighting Noisy Relevance LabelsabstractRelevance labels is the essential part of any learning to rank framework. The rapid development of crowdsourcing platforms led to a significant reduction of the cost of manual labeling. This makes it possible to collect very large sets of labeled documents to train a ranking algorithm. However, relevance labels acquired via crowdsourcing are typically coarse and noisy, so certain consensus models are used to measure the quality of labels and to reduce the noise. This noise is likely to affect a ranker trained on such labels, and, since none of the existing consensus models directly optimizes ranking quality, one has to apply some heuristics to utilize the output of a consensus model in a ranking algorithm, e.g., to use majority voting among workers to get consensus labels. The major goal of this paper is to unify existing approaches to consensus modeling and noise reduction within a learning to rank framework. Namely, we present a machine learning algorithm aimed at improving the performance of a ranker trained on a crowdsourced dataset by proper remapping of labels and reweighting of samples. In the experimental part, we use several characteristics of workers/labels extracted via various consensus models in order to learn the remapping and reweighting functions. Our experiments on a large-scale dataset demonstrate that we can significantly improve state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms by incorporating our framework. Yury Ustinovskiy, Valentina Fedorova, Gleb Gusev, Pavel Serdyukov |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2015 | Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validityabstractThis paper studies theoretically and empirically a method of turning machine-learning algorithms into probabilistic predictors that automatically enjoys a property of validity (perfect calibration) and is computationally efficient. The price to pay for perfect calibration is that these probabilistic predictors produce imprecise (in practice, almost precise for large data sets) probabilities. When these imprecise probabilities are merged into precise probabilities, the resulting predictors, while losing the theoretical property of perfect calibration, are consistently more accurate than the existing methods in empirical studies. Vladimir Vovk, Ivan Petej, Valentina Fedorova |
NIPS | 3 |
| 2014 | Certificates of Non-Membership for Classes of Read-Once FunctionsabstractA certificate of non-membership for a Boolean function f with respect to a class 𝒞, f ∉ 𝒞, is a set S of input strings such that the values of f on strings from S are inconsistent with any function h ∈ 𝒞. We study certificates of non-membership wi Dmitry Chistikov 0001, Valentina Fedorova, Andrei A. Voronenko |
Fundam. Informaticae | 2 |
| 2012 | Plug-in martingales for testing exchangeability on-line
Valentina Fedorova, Alex Gammerman, Ilia Nouretdinov, Vladimir Vovk |
ICML | 1 |