Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Valentina Fedorova

dblp:20/11267 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
5 papers
Data mining · 56% Machine learning and data management · 20% Information retrieval · 18%
Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Image recognition and object detection · 24% Trustworthy machine learning · 24% Learning theory · 16%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning and data management
data annotation
0.922020
Practice of Efficient Data Collection via Crowdsourcing: Aggregation, Incremental Relabelling, and Pricing · WSDM 2020
Crowdsourcing Practice for Efficient Data Labeling: Aggregation, Incremental Relabeling, and Pricing · SIGMOD Conference 2020
Data mining › crowdsourcing
label aggregation
0.922020
Practice of Efficient Data Collection via Crowdsourcing: Aggregation, Incremental Relabelling, and Pricing · WSDM 2020
Crowdsourcing Practice for Efficient Data Labeling: Aggregation, Incremental Relabeling, and Pricing · SIGMOD Conference 2020
Information retrieval › ranking
learning to rank
0.522016
An Optimization Framework for Remapping and Reweighting Noisy Relevance Labels · SIGIR 2016
Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target Learning · ICML 2016
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
text recognition
0.412020
Text Recognition Using Anonymous CAPTCHA Answers · WSDM 2020
Data mining › crowdsourcing
crowdsourced annotation
0.412020
Crowdsourcing Practice for Efficient Data Labeling: Aggregation, Incremental Relabeling, and Pricing · SIGMOD Conference 2020
Data mining › crowdsourcing
crowdsourced data
0.412020
Practice of Efficient Data Collection via Crowdsourcing: Aggregation, Incremental Relabelling, and Pricing · WSDM 2020
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
noisy label learning
0.412020
Text Recognition Using Anonymous CAPTCHA Answers · WSDM 2020
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.212016
Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target Learning · ICML 2016
Data mining
crowdsourcing
0.212016
An Optimization Framework for Remapping and Reweighting Noisy Relevance Labels · SIGIR 2016
Data integration and cleaning › data quality
label noise
0.212016
Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target Learning · ICML 2016
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.212016
Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target Learning · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
calibration
0.212015
Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validity · NIPS 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › probabilistic reasoning
imprecise probability
0.212015
Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validity · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data › time series modeling
probabilistic forecasting
0.212015
Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validity · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation
0.212015
Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validity · NIPS 2015
Machine learning › Learning theory › hypothesis testing
exchangeability testing
0.112012
Plug-in martingales for testing exchangeability on-line · ICML 2012
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing
0.112012
Plug-in martingales for testing exchangeability on-line · ICML 2012
Authentication and access control › human interactive proofs
CAPTCHA
0.112020
Text Recognition Using Anonymous CAPTCHA Answers · WSDM 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

crowdsourcing · 1.7gradient-based hyperparameter optimization · 0.5decision tree learning · 0.5sample reweighting · 0.2majority voting · 0.2label remapping · 0.2venn probability machines · 0.2calibration · 0.2online testing · 0.1martingale · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Crowdsourcing Practice for Efficient Data Labeling: Aggregation, Incremental Relabeling, and Pricing
abstract
In this tutorial, we present a portion of unique industry experience in efficient data labeling via crowdsourcing shared by both leading researchers and engineers from Yandex. We will make an introduction to data labeling via public crowdsourcing marketplaces and will present the key components of efficient label collection. This will be followed by a practice session, where participants will choose one of the real label collection tasks, experiment with selecting settings for the labeling process, and launch their label collection project on one of the largest crowdsourcing marketplaces. The projects will be run on real crowds within the tutorial session. While the crowd performers are annotating the project set up by the attendees, we will present the major theoretical results in efficient aggregation, incremental relabeling, and dynamic pricing. We will also discuss their strengths and weaknesses as well as applicability to real-world tasks, summarizing our five year-long research and industrial expertise in crowdsourcing. Finally, participants will receive a feedback about their projects and practical advice on how to make them more efficient. We invite beginners, advanced specialists, and researchers to learn how to collect high quality labeled data and do it efficiently.
Alexey Drutsa, Valentina Fedorova, Dmitry Ustalov, Olga Megorskaya, Evfrosiniya Zerminova, Daria Baidakova
SIGMOD Conference2
2020 Practice of Efficient Data Collection via Crowdsourcing: Aggregation, Incremental Relabelling, and Pricing
abstract
In this tutorial, we present a portion of unique industry experience in efficient data labelling via crowdsourcing shared by both leading researchers and engineers from Yandex. We will make an introduction to data labelling via public crowdsourcing marketplaces and will present key components of efficient label collection. This will be followed by a practice session, where participants will choose one of the real label collection tasks, experiment with selecting settings for the labelling process, and launch their label collection project on Yandex.Toloka, one of the largest crowdsourcing marketplaces. The projects will be run on real crowds within the tutorial session. Finally, participants will receive a feedback about their projects and practical advice to make them more efficient. We expect that our tutorial will address an audience with a wide range of background and interests. We do not require specific prerequisite knowledge or skills. We invite beginners, advanced specialists, and researchers to learn how to efficiently collect labelled data.
Alexey Drutsa, Valentina Fedorova, Dmitry Ustalov, Olga Megorskaya, Evfrosiniya Zerminova, Daria Baidakova
WSDM2
2020 Text Recognition Using Anonymous CAPTCHA Answers
abstract
Internet companies use crowdsourcing to collect large amounts of data needed for creating products based on machine learning techniques. A significant source of such labels for OCR data sets is (re)CAPTCHA, which distinguishes humans from automated bots by asking them to recognize text and, at the same time, receives new labeled data in this way. An important component of such approach to data collection is the reduction of noisy labels produced by bots and non-qualified users.
Alexander Shishkin, Anastasya A. Bezzubtseva, Valentina Fedorova, Alexey Drutsa, Gleb Gusev
WSDM3
2016 Meta-Gradient Boosted Decision Tree Model for Weight and Target Learning
abstract
Labeled training data is an essential part of any supervised machine learning framework. In practice, there is a trade-off between the quality of a label and its cost. In this paper, we consider a problem of learning to rank on a large-scale dataset with low-quality relevance labels aiming at maximizing the quality of a trained ranker on a small validation dataset with high-quality ground truth relevance labels. Motivated by the classical Gauss-Markov theorem for the linear regression problem, we formulate the problems of (1) reweighting training instances and (2) remapping learning targets. We propose meta–gradient decision tree learning framework for optimizing weight and target functions by applying gradient-based hyperparameter optimization. Experiments on a large-scale real-world dataset demonstrate that we can significantly improve state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms by incorporating our framework.
Yury Ustinovskiy, Valentina Fedorova, Gleb Gusev, Pavel Serdyukov
ICML2
2016 An Optimization Framework for Remapping and Reweighting Noisy Relevance Labels
abstract
Relevance labels is the essential part of any learning to rank framework. The rapid development of crowdsourcing platforms led to a significant reduction of the cost of manual labeling. This makes it possible to collect very large sets of labeled documents to train a ranking algorithm. However, relevance labels acquired via crowdsourcing are typically coarse and noisy, so certain consensus models are used to measure the quality of labels and to reduce the noise. This noise is likely to affect a ranker trained on such labels, and, since none of the existing consensus models directly optimizes ranking quality, one has to apply some heuristics to utilize the output of a consensus model in a ranking algorithm, e.g., to use majority voting among workers to get consensus labels. The major goal of this paper is to unify existing approaches to consensus modeling and noise reduction within a learning to rank framework. Namely, we present a machine learning algorithm aimed at improving the performance of a ranker trained on a crowdsourced dataset by proper remapping of labels and reweighting of samples. In the experimental part, we use several characteristics of workers/labels extracted via various consensus models in order to learn the remapping and reweighting functions. Our experiments on a large-scale dataset demonstrate that we can significantly improve state-of-the-art machine-learning algorithms by incorporating our framework.
Yury Ustinovskiy, Valentina Fedorova, Gleb Gusev, Pavel Serdyukov
SIGIR2
2015 Large-scale probabilistic predictors with and without guarantees of validity
abstract
This paper studies theoretically and empirically a method of turning machine-learning algorithms into probabilistic predictors that automatically enjoys a property of validity (perfect calibration) and is computationally efficient. The price to pay for perfect calibration is that these probabilistic predictors produce imprecise (in practice, almost precise for large data sets) probabilities. When these imprecise probabilities are merged into precise probabilities, the resulting predictors, while losing the theoretical property of perfect calibration, are consistently more accurate than the existing methods in empirical studies.
Vladimir Vovk, Ivan Petej, Valentina Fedorova
NIPS3
2014 Certificates of Non-Membership for Classes of Read-Once Functions
abstract
A certificate of non-membership for a Boolean function f with respect to a class 𝒞, f ∉ 𝒞, is a set S of input strings such that the values of f on strings from S are inconsistent with any function h ∈ 𝒞. We study certificates of non-membership wi
Dmitry Chistikov 0001, Valentina Fedorova, Andrei A. Voronenko
Fundam. Informaticae2
2012 Plug-in martingales for testing exchangeability on-line
Valentina Fedorova, Alex Gammerman, Ilia Nouretdinov, Vladimir Vovk
ICML1