Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

K. Yugandhar

dblp:20/2680 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-1141-4439ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis
protein-protein interaction
0.312017
PROXiMATE: a database of mutant protein-protein complex thermodynamics and kinetics · Bioinform. 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › molecular property prediction
binding affinity prediction
0.212014
Protein-protein binding affinity prediction from amino acid sequence · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein analysis › protein-protein interaction
protein-protein interaction analysis
0.212014
Protein-protein binding affinity prediction from amino acid sequence · Bioinform. 2014
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein-protein interaction prediction
sequence-based affinity prediction
0.212014
Protein-protein binding affinity prediction from amino acid sequence · Bioinform. 2014

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interaction network integration · 0.3sequence-based features · 0.2regression · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Discrimination and Prediction of Protein-Protein Binding Affinity Using Deep Learning Approach
Rahul Nikam, K. Yugandhar, M. Michael Gromiha
ICIC (2)2
2017 PROXiMATE: a database of mutant protein-protein complex thermodynamics and kinetics
abstract
SUMMARY: We have developed PROXiMATE, a database of thermodynamic data for more than 6000 missense mutations in 174 heterodimeric protein-protein complexes, supplemented with interaction network data from STRING database, solvent accessibility, sequence, structural and functional information, experimental conditions and literature information. Additional features include complex structure visualization, search and display options, download options and a provision for users to upload their data. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The database is freely available at http://www.iitm.ac.in/bioinfo/PROXiMATE/ . The website is implemented in Python, and supports recent versions of major browsers such as IE10, Firefox, Chrome and Opera. CONTACT: [email protected]. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Sherlyn Jemimah, K. Yugandhar, M. Michael Gromiha
Bioinform.2
2015 Response to the comment on 'protein-protein binding affinity prediction from amino acid sequence'
abstract
Abstract Contact: [email protected]
K. Yugandhar, M. Michael Gromiha
Bioinform.1
2014 Protein-protein binding affinity prediction from amino acid sequence
abstract
MOTIVATION: Protein-protein interactions play crucial roles in many biological processes and are responsible for smooth functioning of the machinery in living organisms. Predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein complexes provides deep insights to understand the recognition mechanism and identify the strong binding partners in protein-protein interaction networks. RESULTS: In this work, we have collected the experimental binding affinity data for a set of 135 protein-protein complexes and analyzed the relationship between binding affinity and 642 properties obtained from amino acid sequence. We noticed that the overall correlation is poor, and the factors influencing affinity depends on the type of the complex based on their function, molecular weight and binding site residues. Based on the results, we have developed a novel methodology for predicting the binding affinity of protein-protein complexes using sequence-based features by classifying the complexes with respect to their function and predicted percentage of binding site residues. We have developed regression models for the complexes belonging to different classes with three to five properties, which showed a correlation in the range of 0.739-0.992 using jack-knife test. We suggest that our approach adds a new aspect of biological significance in terms of classifying the protein-protein complexes for affinity prediction.
K. Yugandhar, M. Michael Gromiha
Bioinform.1