Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hisashige Ando
dblp:20/3941
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2008
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 3 first-authorSecurity and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Performance modeling and evaluation · 67% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 17% Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 17% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Performance modeling and evaluation › performance prediction
application performance prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Performance prediction of large-scale parallell system and application using macro-level simulation · SC 2008 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
performance prediction |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Performance prediction of large-scale parallell system and application using macro-level simulation · SC 2008 |
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip › error control
error detection and recovery |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | A 1.3GHz fifth generation SPARC64 microprocessor · DAC 2003 |
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
microprocessor design |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | A 1.3GHz fifth generation SPARC64 microprocessor · DAC 2003 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sequential performance modeling · 0.1macro-level simulation · 0.1error detection and recovery · 0.0SOI CMOS · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Validation of hardware error recovery mechanisms for the SPARC64 V microprocessorabstractThe SPARC64 V microprocessor is designed for use in high-reliability, large-scale unix servers. In addition to implementing ECC for large SRAM arrays, the SPARC64 V microprocessor incorporates error detection and recovery mechanisms for processor logic circuits and smaller SRAM arrays. The effectiveness of these error recovery mechanisms was validated via accelerated neutron testing of Fujitsu’s commercial unix server, the PRIMEPOWER 650. Soft errors generated in SRAM arrays were completely recovered by the implemented hardware mechanisms, and only 6.4% of the estimated neutron-induced logic circuit faults manifested as errors, 76% of which were recovered by hardware. From these tests, the soft error failure rate of the SPARC64 V microprocessor due to atmospheric neutron hits was confirmed to be well below 10 FIT. Hisashige Ando, Ryuji Kan, Yoshiharu Tosaka, Keiji Takahisa, Kichiji Hatanaka |
DSN | 1 |
| 2008 | Performance prediction of large-scale parallell system and application using macro-level simulationabstractTo predict application performance on an HPC system is an important technology for designing the computing system and developing applications. However, accurate prediction is a challenge, particularly, in the case of a future coming system with higher performance. In this paper, we present a new method for predicting application performance on HPC systems. This method combines modeling of sequential performance on a single processor and macro-level simulations of applications for parallel performance on the entire system. In the simulation, the execution flow is traced but kernel computations are omitted for reducing the execution time. Validation on a real terascale system showed that the predicted and measured performance agreed within 10% to 20 %. We employed the method in designing a hypothetical petascale system of 32768 SIMD-extended processor cores. For predicting application performance on the petascale system, the macro-level simulation required several hours. Ryutaro Susukita, Hisashige Ando, Mutsumi Aoyagi, Hiroaki Honda, Yuichi Inadomi, Koji Inoue, Shigeru Ishizuki, Yasunori Kimura, Hidemi Komatsu, Motoyoshi Kurokawa, Kazuaki J. Murakami, Hidetomo Shibamura, Shuji Yamamura, Yunqing Yu |
SC | 2 |
| 2005 | A Case Study: Power and Performance Improvement of a Chip Multiprocessor for Transaction ProcessingabstractCurrent high-end microprocessor designs focus on increasing instruction parallelism and clock frequency at the expense of power dissipation. This paper presents a case study of a different direction, a chip multiprocessor (CMP) with a smaller processor core than a baseline high-end 130-nm 64-bit SPARC server uniprocessor. We demonstrate that the size of the baseline processor core can be reduced by 2/3 using a combination of logical resource reduction and dense custom macros while still delivering about 70% of the TPC-C performance. Circuit speed is traded for power reduction by reducing the power supply from 1.0 to 0.8 V and increasing transistor channel lengths by 12.5% above the minimum. The resulting CMP with six reduced size cores and 4-MB L2 cache is estimated to run at 1.8 GHz while consuming less than 30% of the power compared to the scaled baseline dual-core processor running at 2.4 GHz. The proposed CMP is more than four times higher in TPC/W than the dual-core processor, facilitating the design of high-density servers. Hisashige Ando, Nestoras Tzartzanis, William W. Walker |
IEEE Trans. Very Large Scale Integr. Syst. | 1 |
| 2003 | A 1.3GHz fifth generation SPARC64 microprocessorabstractA 5th generation SPARC64 processor is fabricated in 130nm SOI CMOS process with 8 layers of Cu metallization. It runs at 1.3GHz with 34.7W power dissipation in the laboratory. The chip contains over 190M transistors with 19M in logic circuits. The chip size is 18.14mm x 15.99mm. The error detection and recovery mechanism is implemented for execution units and data path logic circuits in addition to on-chip arrays to detect and recover from data logic error. This processor is developed by using mostly in-house CAD tools. Hisashige Ando, Yuuji Yoshida, Aiichiro Inoue, Itsumi Sugiyama, Takeo Asakawa, Kuniki Morita, Toshiyuki Muta, Tsuyoshi Motokurumada, Seishi Okada, Hideo Yamashita, Yoshihiko Satsukawa, Akihiko Konmoto, Ryouichi Yamashita, Hiroyuki Sugiyama |
DAC | 1 |