Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sven Wenzel
dblp:20/4070
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 6 · 4 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Requirements engineering and software design · 43% Empirical software engineering · 30% Software maintenance and evolution · 26% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering › mining software repositories
version history analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2008 | Analyzing model evolution · ICSE 2008 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering › model management
model differencing |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Difference computation of large models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007 |
Software maintenance and evolution
software evolution |
0.1 | 1 | 2007 | Difference computation of large models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007 |
Requirements engineering and software design › model-driven engineering
model-driven development |
0.0 | 1 | 2008 | Analyzing model evolution · ICSE 2008 |
Requirements engineering and software design
model-driven engineering |
0.0 | 1 | 2007 | Difference computation of large models · ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE 2007 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fine-grained differencing · 0.1domain-specific language analysis · 0.1high-dimensional search tree · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Restoring security of evolving software models using graph transformation
Jens Bürger 0001, Jan Jürjens, Sven Wenzel |
Int. J. Softw. Tools Technol. Transf. | 3 |
| 2014 | Unique identification of elements in evolving software models
Sven Wenzel |
Softw. Syst. Model. | 1 |
| 2013 | Ontology-based Analysis of Compliance and Regulatory Requirements of Business Processes
Thorsten Humberg, Christian Wessel, Daniel Poggenpohl, Sven Wenzel, Thomas Ruhroth, Jan Jürjens |
CLOSER | 4 |
| 2012 | Securing Processes for Outsourcing into the Cloud
Sven Wenzel, Christian Wessel, Thorsten Humberg, Jan Jürjens |
CLOSER | 1 |
| 2009 | Evolution analysis with animated and 3D-visualizationsabstractLarge software systems typically exist in many revisions. In order to analyze such systems, their evolution needs to be analyzed, too. The main challenge in this context is to cope with the large volume of data and to visualize the system and its evolution as a whole. This paper presents an approach for visualizing the evolution of large-scale systems which uses three different, tightly integrated visualizations that are 3-dimensional and/or animated and which support different analysis tasks. According to a first empirical study, all tasks are supported well by at least one visualization. Sven Wenzel, Jens Koch, Udo Kelter, Andreas Kolb 0001 |
ICSM | 1 |
| 2008 | Analyzing model evolutionabstractModel-driven development leads to development processes in which a large number of different versions of models are produced. We present FAME, a tool environment which enables fine-grained analysis of the version history of a model. The tool is generic in the sense that it can work with various model types including UML and domain-specific languages. Sven Wenzel, Udo Kelter |
ICSE | 1 |
| 2007 | Tracing Model ElementsabstractIn model-driven engineering developers work mainly or only with models, which exist in many versions. This paper presents an approach to trace single model elements or groups of elements within a version history of a model. It also offers analysis capabilities such as detection of logical coupling between model elements. The approach uses a differencing algorithm blown as SiDiff to identify similar elements in different versions of a model. SiDiff is highly configurable and thus our tracing approach can be adapted to all diagram types of the UML and to a large set of domain specific languages. The approach has been implemented as an Eclipse plug-in that visualizes all relevant information about the traces and it allows developers to interactively explore details. It has been evaluated by several groups of test persons; they considered most of the functions of the tool to be very useful. Sven Wenzel, Hermann Hutter, Udo Kelter |
ICSM | 1 |
| 2007 | Difference computation of large modelsabstractModern software engineering practices lead to large models which exist in many versions. Version management systems should offer a service to compare, and possibly merge, these models. The computation of a difference between large models is a big challenge; current algorithms are too inefficient here. We present a new technique for computing differences between models. In practical tests, this technique has been an order of magnitude faster than currently known algorithms. The main idea is to use a high-dimensional search tree for efficiently finding similar model elements. Individual elements are mapped onto a vector of numerical values using a collection of metrics for models and a numerical representation of the names which occur in a model. Christoph Treude, Stefan Berlik, Sven Wenzel, Udo Kelter |
ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE | 3 |