Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gary G. Leininger
dblp:20/4447
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › compliant motion control
hybrid position/force control |
0.0 | 2 | 1985 | Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulator · ICRA 1985 Adaptive self-tuning control of manipulators in task coordinate system · ICRA 1984 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
adaptive control |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulator · ICRA 1985 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulator · ICRA 1985 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › adaptive control
self-tuning control |
0.0 | 1 | 1985 | Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulator · ICRA 1985 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
task coordinate pole-placement self-tuning · 0.0stochastic approximation · 0.0self-tuning control · 0.0resolved motion force control · 0.0pole placement · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1993 | Parallel Implementation of a Recursive Least-Squares Neural Network Training Method on the Intel iPSC/2
James Edward Steck, Bruce M. McMillin, K. Krishnamurthy, Gary G. Leininger |
J. Parallel Distributed Comput. | 4 |
| 1990 | Parallel implementation of a recursive least squares neural network training method on the Intel iPSC/2abstractAn algorithm based on the Marquardt-Levenberg least-square optimization method has been shown by S. Kollias and D. Anastassiou (IEEE Trans. on Circuits Syst. vol.36, no.8, p.1092-101, Aug. 1989) to be a much more efficient training method than gradient descent, when applied to some small feedforward neural networks. Yet, for many applications, the increase in computational complexity of the method outweighs any gain in learning rate obtained over current training methods. However, the least-squares method can be more efficiently implemented on parallel architectures than standard methods. This is demonstrated by comparing computation times and learning rates for the least-squares method implemented on 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 processors on an Intel iPSC/2 multicomputer. Two applications which demonstrate the faster real-time learning rate of the last-squares method over than of gradient descent are given James Edward Steck, Bruce M. McMillin, K. Krishnamurthy, M. R. Ashouri, Gary G. Leininger |
IJCNN | 5 |
| 1985 | Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulatorabstractReal time hybrid control results with resolved motion force control (RMFC) and task coordinate pole-placement self-tuning (TST) are given. The control methods calculate corrective forces in a Cartesian coordinate frame to eliminate position and force errors. These forces are transformed to equivalent joint inputs for actuation. RMFC uses stochastic approximation to adapt to changing manipulator dynamics. TST uses self-tuning in the task frame to estimate dynamic system models and place closed loop poles. Results show both methods capable of the hybrid control application but friction has a large effect on the control. Paul Backes, Gary G. Leininger, Chun-Hsien Chung |
ICRA | 2 |
| 1984 | Adaptive self-tuning control of manipulators in task coordinate systemabstractThe pole placement self-tuning control method is applied to the control of the manipulators directly in the task coordinate system, which results in highly desirable task-oriented performance characteristics. In the task coordinate, the position control axes and force control axes are orthogonal, therefore, hybrid control can be achieved without degradation in performance of the control system. With the learning mechanism at the task location, dynamic friction and compliant effects are automatically compensated. Simulation results for both position control and hybrid control using the JPL-Stanford Arm demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. Chun-Hsien Chung, Gary G. Leininger |
ICRA | 2 |