Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Gary G. Leininger

dblp:20/4447 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1993
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › compliant motion control
hybrid position/force control
0.021985
Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulator · ICRA 1985
Adaptive self-tuning control of manipulators in task coordinate system · ICRA 1984
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
adaptive control
0.011985
Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulator · ICRA 1985
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.011985
Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulator · ICRA 1985
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › adaptive control
self-tuning control
0.011985
Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulator · ICRA 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

task coordinate pole-placement self-tuning · 0.0stochastic approximation · 0.0self-tuning control · 0.0resolved motion force control · 0.0pole placement · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1993 Parallel Implementation of a Recursive Least-Squares Neural Network Training Method on the Intel iPSC/2
James Edward Steck, Bruce M. McMillin, K. Krishnamurthy, Gary G. Leininger
J. Parallel Distributed Comput.4
1990 Parallel implementation of a recursive least squares neural network training method on the Intel iPSC/2
abstract
An algorithm based on the Marquardt-Levenberg least-square optimization method has been shown by S. Kollias and D. Anastassiou (IEEE Trans. on Circuits Syst. vol.36, no.8, p.1092-101, Aug. 1989) to be a much more efficient training method than gradient descent, when applied to some small feedforward neural networks. Yet, for many applications, the increase in computational complexity of the method outweighs any gain in learning rate obtained over current training methods. However, the least-squares method can be more efficiently implemented on parallel architectures than standard methods. This is demonstrated by comparing computation times and learning rates for the least-squares method implemented on 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16 processors on an Intel iPSC/2 multicomputer. Two applications which demonstrate the faster real-time learning rate of the last-squares method over than of gradient descent are given
James Edward Steck, Bruce M. McMillin, K. Krishnamurthy, M. R. Ashouri, Gary G. Leininger
IJCNN5
1985 Real-time cartesian coordinate hybrid control of a PUMA 560 manipulator
abstract
Real time hybrid control results with resolved motion force control (RMFC) and task coordinate pole-placement self-tuning (TST) are given. The control methods calculate corrective forces in a Cartesian coordinate frame to eliminate position and force errors. These forces are transformed to equivalent joint inputs for actuation. RMFC uses stochastic approximation to adapt to changing manipulator dynamics. TST uses self-tuning in the task frame to estimate dynamic system models and place closed loop poles. Results show both methods capable of the hybrid control application but friction has a large effect on the control.
Paul Backes, Gary G. Leininger, Chun-Hsien Chung
ICRA2
1984 Adaptive self-tuning control of manipulators in task coordinate system
abstract
The pole placement self-tuning control method is applied to the control of the manipulators directly in the task coordinate system, which results in highly desirable task-oriented performance characteristics. In the task coordinate, the position control axes and force control axes are orthogonal, therefore, hybrid control can be achieved without degradation in performance of the control system. With the learning mechanism at the task location, dynamic friction and compliant effects are automatically compensated. Simulation results for both position control and hybrid control using the JPL-Stanford Arm demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Chun-Hsien Chung, Gary G. Leininger
ICRA2