Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Luca Melis

dblp:20/5104 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
12ranked-venue papers
2as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-1946-6578ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 since 2021Security and privacy · 3 · 2 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 since 2021Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
8 papers
Privacy and data protection · 84% Security and privacy of machine learning · 14% Malware analysis · 2%
Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Trustworthy machine learning · 30% Reinforcement learning · 26%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 25 heaviest of 28, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
2.752025
Auditing $f$-differential privacy in one run · ICML 2025
Federated Linear Contextual Bandits with User-level Differential Privacy · ICML 2023
Differentially Private Query Release Through Adaptive Projection · ICML 2021
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › relaxed differential privacy
f-differential privacy
0.912025
Auditing $f$-differential privacy in one run · ICML 2025
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy auditing
0.912025
Auditing $f$-differential privacy in one run · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder
0.812024
ReMasker: Imputing Tabular Data with Masked Autoencoding · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked modeling
0.812024
ReMasker: Imputing Tabular Data with Masked Autoencoding · ICLR 2024
Data integration and cleaning › missing data
missing value imputation
0.812024
ReMasker: Imputing Tabular Data with Masked Autoencoding · ICLR 2024
Data integration and cleaning › missing data › missing value imputation
tabular data imputation
0.812024
ReMasker: Imputing Tabular Data with Masked Autoencoding · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
contextual bandit
0.712023
Federated Linear Contextual Bandits with User-level Differential Privacy · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit › contextual bandit
federated linear contextual bandits
0.712023
Federated Linear Contextual Bandits with User-level Differential Privacy · ICML 2023
Privacy and data protection › privacy analysis › privacy models
user-level differential privacy
0.712023
Federated Linear Contextual Bandits with User-level Differential Privacy · ICML 2023
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › algorithmic mechanism design
online mechanism design
0.712023
Federated Linear Contextual Bandits with User-level Differential Privacy · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.512021
Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform Perturbations · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.512021
Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform Perturbations · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.512021
Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform Perturbations · NeurIPS 2021
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private query answering
0.512021
Differentially Private Query Release Through Adaptive Projection · ICML 2021
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
differentially private generative model
0.412019
Differentially Private Mixture of Generative Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2019
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
collaborative learning
0.412019
Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learning · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › synthetic data generation
differentially private generative model
0.412019
Differentially Private Mixture of Generative Neural Networks · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2019
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning
0.412019
Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learning · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference
0.412019
Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learning · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy attack
property inference attack
0.412019
Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learning · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
training data privacy
0.412019
Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learning · IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model › discrete latent variable model
generative mixture models
0.312017
Differentially Private Mixture of Generative Neural Networks · ICDM 2017
Privacy and data protection
privacy-preserving data analysis
0.212016
Efficient Private Statistics with Succinct Sketches · NDSS 2016
Malware analysis
malware classification
0.112021
Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform Perturbations · NeurIPS 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

upper and lower regret bounds · 2.0hedge · 2.0self-supervised learning · 1.5masked autoencoding · 1.5robustness certification · 1.0non-uniform perturbation · 1.0f-DP curve analysis · 0.9randomized rounding · 0.5projection mechanism · 0.5adaptive projection · 0.5mixture models · 0.4mixture model · 0.4generative neural networks · 0.4generative neural network · 0.4differentially private kernel k-means · 0.3differentially private gradient descent · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Auditing $f$-differential privacy in one run
abstract
Empirical auditing has emerged as a means of catching some of the flaws in the implementation of privacy-preserving algorithms. Existing auditing mechanisms, however, are either computationally inefficient -- requiring multiple runs of the machine learning algorithms —- or suboptimal in calculating an empirical privacy. In this work, we present a tight and efficient auditing procedure and analysis that can effectively assess the privacy of mechanisms. Our approach is efficient; Similar to the recent work of Steinke, Nasr and Jagielski (2023), our auditing procedure leverages the randomness of examples in the input dataset and requires only a single run of the target mechanism. And it is more accurate; we provide a novel analysis that enables us to achieve tight empirical privacy estimates by using the hypothesized $f$-DP curve of the mechanism, which provides a more accurate measure of privacy than the traditional $\epsilon,\delta$ differential privacy parameters. We use our auditing procure and analysis to obtain empirical privacy, demonstrating that our auditing procedure delivers tighter privacy estimates.
Saeed Mahloujifar, Luca Melis, Kamalika Chaudhuri
ICML2
2024 ReMasker: Imputing Tabular Data with Masked Autoencoding
abstract
We present ReMasker, a new method of imputing missing values in tabular data by extending the masked autoencoding framework. Compared with prior work, ReMasker is extremely simple -- besides the missing values (i.e., naturally masked), we randomly "re-mask" another set of values, optimize the autoencoder by reconstructing this re-masked set, and apply the trained model to predict the missing values; and yet highly effective -- with extensive evaluation on benchmark datasets, we show that ReMasker performs on par with or outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of both imputation fidelity and utility under various missingness settings, while its performance advantage often increases with the ratio of missing data. We further explore theoretical justification for its effectiveness, showing that ReMasker tends to learn missingness-invariant representations of tabular data. Our findings indicate that masked modeling represents a promising direction for further research on tabular data imputation. The code is publicly available.
Tianyu Du, Luca Melis, Ting Wang 0006
ICLR2
2023 Federated Linear Contextual Bandits with User-level Differential Privacy
abstract
This paper studies federated linear contextual bandits under the notion of user-level differential privacy (DP). We first introduce a unified federated bandits framework that can accommodate various definitions of DP in the sequential decision-making setting. We then formally introduce user-level central DP (CDP) and local DP (LDP) in the federated bandits framework, and investigate the fundamental trade-offs between the learning regrets and the corresponding DP guarantees in a federated linear contextual bandits model. For CDP, we propose a federated algorithm termed as $\texttt{ROBIN}$ and show that it is near-optimal in terms of the number of clients $M$ and the privacy budget $\varepsilon$ by deriving nearly-matching upper and lower regret bounds when user-level DP is satisfied. For LDP, we obtain several lower bounds, indicating that learning under user-level $(\varepsilon,\delta)$-LDP must suffer a regret blow-up factor at least $\min\{1/\varepsilon,M\}$ or $\min\{1/\sqrt{\varepsilon},\sqrt{M}\}$ under different conditions.
Ruiquan Huang, Luca Melis, Milan Shen, Meisam Hejazinia, Jing Yang 0002
ICML3
2022 Towards Fair Federated Recommendation Learning: Characterizing the Inter-Dependence of System and Data Heterogeneity
abstract
Federated learning (FL) is an effective mechanism for data privacy in recommender systems that runs machine learning model training on-device. While prior FL optimizations tackled the data and system heterogeneity challenges, they assume the two are independent of each other. This fundamental assumption is not reflective of real-world, large-scale recommender systems — data and system heterogeneity are tightly intertwined. This paper takes a data-driven approach to show the inter-dependence of data and system heterogeneity in real-world data and quantifies its impact on the overall model quality and fairness. We design a framework, RF2, to model the inter-dependence and evaluate its impact on state-of-the-art model optimization techniques for federated recommendation tasks. We demonstrate that the impact on fairness can be severe under realistic heterogeneity scenarios, by up to 15.8–41 × compared to a simple setup assumed in most (if not all) prior work. The result shows that modeling realistic system-induced data heterogeneity is essential to achieving fair federated recommendation learning.
Kiwan Maeng, Haiyu Lu, Luca Melis, John Nguyen, Michael G. Rabbat, Carole-Jean Wu
RecSys3
2021 Differentially Private Query Release Through Adaptive Projection
abstract
We propose, implement, and evaluate a new algo-rithm for releasing answers to very large numbersof statistical queries likek-way marginals, sub-ject to differential privacy. Our algorithm makesadaptive use of a continuous relaxation of thePro-jection Mechanism, which answers queries on theprivate dataset using simple perturbation, and thenattempts to find the synthetic dataset that mostclosely matches the noisy answers. We use a con-tinuous relaxation of the synthetic dataset domainwhich makes the projection loss differentiable,and allows us to use efficient ML optimizationtechniques and tooling. Rather than answering allqueries up front, we make judicious use of ourprivacy budget by iteratively finding queries forwhich our (relaxed) synthetic data has high error,and then repeating the projection. Randomizedrounding allows us to obtain synthetic data in theoriginal schema. We perform experimental evalu-ations across a range of parameters and datasets,and find that our method outperforms existingalgorithms on large query classes.
Sergül Aydöre, Michael Kearns, Krishnaram Kenthapadi, Luca Melis, Aaron Roth 0001, Amaresh Ankit Siva
ICML5
2021 Adversarial Robustness with Non-uniform Perturbations
abstract
Robustness of machine learning models is critical for security related applications, where real-world adversaries are uniquely focused on evading neural network based detectors. Prior work mainly focus on crafting adversarial examples (AEs) with small uniform norm-bounded perturbations across features to maintain the requirement of imperceptibility. However, uniform perturbations do not result in realistic AEs in domains such as malware, finance, and social networks. For these types of applications, features typically have some semantically meaningful dependencies. The key idea of our proposed approach is to enable non-uniform perturbations that can adequately represent these feature dependencies during adversarial training. We propose using characteristics of the empirical data distribution, both on correlations between the features and the importance of the features themselves. Using experimental datasets for malware classification, credit risk prediction, and spam detection, we show that our approach is more robust to real-world attacks. Finally, we present robustness certification utilizing non-uniform perturbation bounds, and show that non-uniform bounds achieve better certification.
Ece Naz Erdemir, Jeffrey Bickford, Luca Melis, Sergül Aydöre
NeurIPS3
2019 Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learning
abstract
Collaborative machine learning and related techniques such as federated learning allow multiple participants, each with his own training dataset, to build a joint model by training locally and periodically exchanging model updates. We demonstrate that these updates leak unintended information about participants' training data and develop passive and active inference attacks to exploit this leakage. First, we show that an adversarial participant can infer the presence of exact data points -- for example, specific locations -- in others' training data (i.e., membership inference). Then, we show how this adversary can infer properties that hold only for a subset of the training data and are independent of the properties that the joint model aims to capture. For example, he can infer when a specific person first appears in the photos used to train a binary gender classifier. We evaluate our attacks on a variety of tasks, datasets, and learning configurations, analyze their limitations, and discuss possible defenses.
Luca Melis, Congzheng Song, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Vitaly Shmatikov
IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy1
2019 Fast privacy-preserving network function outsourcing
abstract
In this paper, we present the design and implementation of SplitBox, a system for privacy-preserving processing of network functions outsourced to cloud middleboxes—i.e., without revealing the policies governing these functions. SplitBox is built to provide privacy for a generic network function that abstracts the functionality of a variety of network functions and associated policies, including firewalls, virtual LANs, network address translators (NATs), deep packet inspection , and load balancers. We present a scalable design aiming to provide high throughput and low latency, by distributing functionalities to a few virtual machines (VMs), while providing provably secure guarantees. We implement SplitBox inside FastClick, an extension of the Click modular router, using Intel’s DPDK to handle packet I/O. We evaluate our prototype experimentally to find its bottlenecks and stress-test its different components, vis-à-vis two widely used network functions, i.e., firewall and VLAN tagging. Our evaluation shows that, on commodity hardware, SplitBox can process packets close to line rate (i.e., 8.9Gbps) with up to 50 traversed policies.
Hassan Jameel Asghar, Emiliano De Cristofaro, Guillaume Jourjon, Mohamed Ali Kâafar, Laurent Mathy, Luca Melis, Craig Russell, Mang Yu
Comput. Networks6
2019 LOGAN: Membership Inference Attacks Against Generative Models
abstract
Abstract Generative models estimate the underlying distribution of a dataset to generate realistic samples according to that distribution. In this paper, we present the first membership inference attacks against generative models: given a data point, the adversary determines whether or not it was used to train the model. Our attacks leverage Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), which combine a discriminative and a generative model, to detect overfitting and recognize inputs that were part of training datasets, using the discriminator’s capacity to learn statistical differences in distributions. We present attacks based on both white-box and black-box access to the target model, against several state-of-the-art generative models, over datasets of complex representations of faces (LFW), objects (CIFAR-10), and medical images (Diabetic Retinopathy). We also discuss the sensitivity of the attacks to different training parameters, and their robustness against mitigation strategies, finding that defenses are either ineffective or lead to significantly worse performances of the generative models in terms of training stability and/or sample quality.
Jamie Hayes, Luca Melis, George Danezis, Emiliano De Cristofaro
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol.2
2019 Differentially Private Mixture of Generative Neural Networks
Gergely Ács, Luca Melis, Claude Castelluccia, Emiliano De Cristofaro
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.2
2017 Differentially Private Mixture of Generative Neural Networks
abstract
Generative models are used in an increasing number of applications that rely on large amounts of contextually rich information about individuals. Owing to possible privacy violations, however, publishing or sharing generative models is not always viable. In this paper, we introduce a novel solution for privately releasing generative models and entire high-dimensional datasets produced by these models. We model the generator distribution of the training data by a mixture of k generative neural networks. These are trained together and collectively learn the generator distribution of a dataset. Data is divided into k clusters, using a novel differentially private kernel k-means, then each cluster is given to separate generative neural networks, such as Restricted Boltzmann Machines or Variational Autoencoders, which are trained only on their own cluster using differentially private gradient descent. We evaluate our approach using the MNIST dataset and a large Call Detail Records dataset, showing that it produces realistic synthetic samples, which can also be used to accurately compute arbitrary number of counting queries.
Gergely Ács, Luca Melis, Claude Castelluccia, Emiliano De Cristofaro
ICDM2
2016 Efficient Private Statistics with Succinct Sketches
Luca Melis, George Danezis, Emiliano De Cristofaro
NDSS1