Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hans Rischel

dblp:20/5266 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Requirements engineering and software design · 50% Program verification · 50%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 62% Embedded and real-time systems · 38%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification › reactive system verification
real-time system verification
0.011993
Specifying and Verifying Requirements of Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1993
Requirements engineering and software design
requirements specification
0.011993
Specifying and Verifying Requirements of Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1993
Electronic design automation › formal methods
formal specification and verification
0.011993
Specifying and Verifying Requirements of Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1993
Embedded and real-time systems
distributed real-time systems
0.011993
Specifying and Verifying Requirements of Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1993
Embedded and real-time systems › networked embedded systems
sensor-actuator networks
0.011993
Specifying and Verifying Requirements of Real-Time Systems · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 1993

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

interval logic · 0.0duration calculus · 0.0deduction · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Development of Safety-Critical Real-Time Systems
Hans Rischel, Jorge Cuéllar, Simon Mørk, Anders P. Ravn, Isolde Wildgruber
SOFSEM1
1993 Specifying and Verifying Requirements of Real-Time Systems
abstract
An approach to specification of requirements and verification of design for real-time systems is presented. A system is defined by a conventional mathematical model for a dynamic system where application specific states denote functions of real time. Specifications are formulas in duration calculus, a real-time interval logic, where predicates define durations of states. Requirements define safety and functionality constraints on the system or a component. A top-level design is given by a control law: a predicate that defines an automation controlling the transition between phases of operation. Each phase maintains certain relations among the system states; this is analogous to the control functions known from conventional control theory. The top-level design is decomposed into an architecture for a distributed system with specifications for sensor, actuator, and program components. Programs control the distributed computation through synchronous events. Sensors and actuators relate events with system states. Verification is a deduction showing that a design implies requirements.>
Anders P. Ravn, Hans Rischel, Kirsten Mark Hansen
IEEE Trans. Software Eng.2