Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jos de Bruin
dblp:20/5285
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Speech recognition and synthesis · 23% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 77% Programming languages and type systems · 23% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics
computational semantics |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | The Interpretation of Relational Nouns · ACL 1988 |
Program analysis
symbolic execution |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | Symbolic Evaluation of LISP Functions with Side Effects for Verification · IJCAI 1981 |
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech interaction
spoken language interface |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | The Interpretation of Relational Nouns · ACL 1988 |
Programming languages and type systems › functional programming
lisp |
0.0 | 1 | 1981 | Symbolic Evaluation of LISP Functions with Side Effects for Verification · IJCAI 1981 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
compositional semantics · 0.0symbolic evaluation · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | The Interpretation of Relational NounsabstractThis paper decribes a computational treatment of the semantics of relational nouns. It covers relational nouns such as "sister" and "commander", and focuses especially on a particular subcategory of them, called function nouns ("speed", "distance", "rating"). Relational nouns are usually viewed as either requiring non-compositional semantic interpretation, or causing an undesirable proliferation of syntactic rules. In contrast to this, we present a treatment which is both syntactically uniform and semantically compositional. The core ideas of this treatment are: (1) The recognition of different levels of semantic analysis; in particular, the distinction between an English-oriented and a domain-oriented level of meaning representation. (2) The analysis of relational nouns as denoting relation-extensions.The paper shows how this approach handles a variety of linguistic constructions involving relational nouns. The treatment presented here has been implemented in BBN's Spoken Language System, an experimental spoken language interface to a database/graphics system. Jos de Bruin, Remko Scha |
ACL | 1 |
| 1981 | Symbolic Evaluation of LISP Functions with Side Effects for Verification
Dennis de Champeaux, Jos de Bruin |
IJCAI | 2 |