Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jos de Bruin

dblp:20/5285 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Speech recognition and synthesis · 23%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program analysis · 77% Programming languages and type systems · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics
computational semantics
0.011988
The Interpretation of Relational Nouns · ACL 1988
Program analysis
symbolic execution
0.011981
Symbolic Evaluation of LISP Functions with Side Effects for Verification · IJCAI 1981
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech interaction
spoken language interface
0.011988
The Interpretation of Relational Nouns · ACL 1988
Programming languages and type systems › functional programming
lisp
0.011981
Symbolic Evaluation of LISP Functions with Side Effects for Verification · IJCAI 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

compositional semantics · 0.0symbolic evaluation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1988 The Interpretation of Relational Nouns
abstract
This paper decribes a computational treatment of the semantics of relational nouns. It covers relational nouns such as "sister" and "commander", and focuses especially on a particular subcategory of them, called function nouns ("speed", "distance", "rating"). Relational nouns are usually viewed as either requiring non-compositional semantic interpretation, or causing an undesirable proliferation of syntactic rules. In contrast to this, we present a treatment which is both syntactically uniform and semantically compositional. The core ideas of this treatment are: (1) The recognition of different levels of semantic analysis; in particular, the distinction between an English-oriented and a domain-oriented level of meaning representation. (2) The analysis of relational nouns as denoting relation-extensions.The paper shows how this approach handles a variety of linguistic constructions involving relational nouns. The treatment presented here has been implemented in BBN's Spoken Language System, an experimental spoken language interface to a database/graphics system.
Jos de Bruin, Remko Scha
ACL1
1981 Symbolic Evaluation of LISP Functions with Side Effects for Verification
Dennis de Champeaux, Jos de Bruin
IJCAI2