Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Tao Wu 0019

dblp:20/5998-19 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Data mining · 84% Recommender systems · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation
next-item recommendation
0.312017
Retrospective Higher-Order Markov Processes for User Trails · KDD 2017
Data mining › sequence analysis
sequential data modeling
0.312017
Retrospective Higher-Order Markov Processes for User Trails · KDD 2017
Data mining
clustering
0.212016
General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order Data · NIPS 2016
Data mining › clustering
co-clustering
0.212016
General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order Data · NIPS 2016
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering
0.212016
General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order Data · NIPS 2016
Data mining › clustering › multi-view clustering
tensor-based clustering
0.212016
General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order Data · NIPS 2016
Data mining › text mining › text classification › hierarchical classification
hierarchical multi-label classification
0.212015
Determining Expert Research Areas with Multi-Instance Learning of Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification Model · IJCAI 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tensor factorization · 0.3retrospective higher-order markov process · 0.3kneser-ney regularization · 0.3spectral methods · 0.2random walk model · 0.2multi-instance learning · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Retrospective Higher-Order Markov Processes for User Trails
abstract
Users form information trails as they checkin with a geolocation, rate items, or consume media. A common problem is to predict what a user might do next for the purposes of guidance, recommendation, or prefetching. Markov chains models have been widely used methods to study such sequences of data. First-order Markov chains are easy to estimate, but lack accuracy when history matters. Higher-order Markov chains, in contrast, have too many parameters and suffer from overfitting the training data. Fitting these parameters with regularization and smoothing only offers mild improvements. In this paper we propose the retrospective higher-order Markov process (RHOMP) as a low-parameter model for such sequences. This model is a special case of a higher-order Markov chain where the transitions depend retrospectively on a single history state instead of an arbitrary combination of history states. There are two immediate computational advantages: the number of parameters is linear in the order of the Markov chain and the model can be fit to large state spaces. Furthermore, by providing a specific structure to the higher-order chain, RHOMPs improve the model accuracy by efficiently utilizing history states without risks of overfitting the data. We demonstrate how to estimate a RHOMP from data and we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on various real application datasets spanning geolocation data, review sequences, and business locations. The RHOMP model uniformly outperforms higher-order Markov chains, Kneser-Ney regularization, and tensor factorizations in terms of prediction accuracy.
Tao Wu 0019, David F. Gleich
KDD1
2016 Supervised Local Contexts Aggregation for Effective Session Search
Jingang Wang, Tao Wu 0019, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Luo Si
ECIR3
2016 General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order Data
abstract
Spectral clustering and co-clustering are well-known techniques in data analysis, and recent work has extended spectral clustering to square, symmetric tensors and hypermatrices derived from a network. We develop a new tensor spectral co-clustering method that simultaneously clusters the rows, columns, and slices of a nonnegative three-mode tensor and generalizes to tensors with any number of modes. The algorithm is based on a new random walk model which we call the super-spacey random surfer. We show that our method out-performs state-of-the-art co-clustering methods on several synthetic datasets with ground truth clusters and then use the algorithm to analyze several real-world datasets.
Tao Wu 0019, Austin R. Benson, David F. Gleich
NIPS1
2015 Determining Expert Research Areas with Multi-Instance Learning of Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification Model
Tao Wu 0019, Qifan Wang 0001, Luo Si
IJCAI1