Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tao Wu 0019
dblp:20/5998-19
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 84% Recommender systems · 16% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Recommender systems › sequential recommendation
next-item recommendation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Retrospective Higher-Order Markov Processes for User Trails · KDD 2017 |
Data mining › sequence analysis
sequential data modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Retrospective Higher-Order Markov Processes for User Trails · KDD 2017 |
Data mining
clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order Data · NIPS 2016 |
Data mining › clustering
co-clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order Data · NIPS 2016 |
Data mining › clustering
spectral clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order Data · NIPS 2016 |
Data mining › clustering › multi-view clustering
tensor-based clustering |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order Data · NIPS 2016 |
Data mining › text mining › text classification › hierarchical classification
hierarchical multi-label classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Determining Expert Research Areas with Multi-Instance Learning of Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification Model · IJCAI 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tensor factorization · 0.3retrospective higher-order markov process · 0.3kneser-ney regularization · 0.3spectral methods · 0.2random walk model · 0.2multi-instance learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Retrospective Higher-Order Markov Processes for User TrailsabstractUsers form information trails as they checkin with a geolocation, rate items, or consume media. A common problem is to predict what a user might do next for the purposes of guidance, recommendation, or prefetching. Markov chains models have been widely used methods to study such sequences of data. First-order Markov chains are easy to estimate, but lack accuracy when history matters. Higher-order Markov chains, in contrast, have too many parameters and suffer from overfitting the training data. Fitting these parameters with regularization and smoothing only offers mild improvements. In this paper we propose the retrospective higher-order Markov process (RHOMP) as a low-parameter model for such sequences. This model is a special case of a higher-order Markov chain where the transitions depend retrospectively on a single history state instead of an arbitrary combination of history states. There are two immediate computational advantages: the number of parameters is linear in the order of the Markov chain and the model can be fit to large state spaces. Furthermore, by providing a specific structure to the higher-order chain, RHOMPs improve the model accuracy by efficiently utilizing history states without risks of overfitting the data. We demonstrate how to estimate a RHOMP from data and we demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on various real application datasets spanning geolocation data, review sequences, and business locations. The RHOMP model uniformly outperforms higher-order Markov chains, Kneser-Ney regularization, and tensor factorizations in terms of prediction accuracy. Tao Wu 0019, David F. Gleich |
KDD | 1 |
| 2016 | Supervised Local Contexts Aggregation for Effective Session Search
Jingang Wang, Tao Wu 0019, Pengjie Ren, Zhumin Chen, Luo Si |
ECIR | 3 |
| 2016 | General Tensor Spectral Co-clustering for Higher-Order DataabstractSpectral clustering and co-clustering are well-known techniques in data analysis, and recent work has extended spectral clustering to square, symmetric tensors and hypermatrices derived from a network. We develop a new tensor spectral co-clustering method that simultaneously clusters the rows, columns, and slices of a nonnegative three-mode tensor and generalizes to tensors with any number of modes. The algorithm is based on a new random walk model which we call the super-spacey random surfer. We show that our method out-performs state-of-the-art co-clustering methods on several synthetic datasets with ground truth clusters and then use the algorithm to analyze several real-world datasets. Tao Wu 0019, Austin R. Benson, David F. Gleich |
NIPS | 1 |
| 2015 | Determining Expert Research Areas with Multi-Instance Learning of Hierarchical Multi-Label Classification Model
Tao Wu 0019, Qifan Wang 0001, Luo Si |
IJCAI | 1 |