Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

V. Marathe

dblp:20/6298 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1978
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Performance modeling and evaluation › queueing models › multiserver queue
m/m/m queue
0.011978
Analysis and Applications of the Delay Cycle for the M/M/c Queueing System · J. ACM 1978
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.011978
Analysis and Applications of the Delay Cycle for the M/M/c Queueing System · J. ACM 1978

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

closed-form analysis · 0.0busy period decomposition · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1978 Analysis and Applications of the Delay Cycle for the M/M/c Queueing System
abstract
The method of analysis employing decomposition of busy periods has, in various forms, been applied to the M/G/1 queueing system under a variety of scheduling rules This paper extends the technique of decomposition of busy periods in order to deal with the M/M/c queueing system. Particular attention is given to a special busy period referred to as a "delay cycle." The delay cycle commences with a delay period (of general distribution) in which jobs arrive but are not serviced, at the conclusion of the delay period, processing begins and continues until the system is empty. Closed form solutions are obtained for various entities such as distribution of busy period length and expected waiting time conditioned on the type of busy period in progress at the tmae of job arrival. These results are applied and extended to the analysis of six examples of multiprocessor systems.
Kenneth J. Omahen, V. Marathe
J. ACM2