On-demand ridepooling systems offer flexible services pooling multiple passengers into one vehicle, complementing traditional bus services. We propose a transportation system combining the spatial aspects of a fixed sequence of bus stops with the temporal flexibility of ridepooling. In the line-based Dial-a-Ride problem (liDARP), vehicles adhere to a fixed, ordered sequence of stops in their routes, with the possibility of taking shortcuts and turning if they are empty. We propose three MILP formulations for the liDARP with a multi-objective function balancing environmental aspects with customer satisfaction, comparing them on a real-world bus line. Our experiments show that the formulation based on an Event-Based graph is the fastest, solving instances with up to 50 requests in under one second. Compared to the classical DARP, the liDARP is computationally faster, with minimal increases in total distance driven and average ride times.

We consider a basic vehicle scheduling problem that arises in the context of travel demand models: Given demanded vehicle trips, what is the minimal number of vehicles needed to fulfill the demand? In this paper, we model the vehicle scheduling problem as a network flow problem. Since instances arising in the context of travel demand models are often so big that the network flow model becomes intractable, we propose using a rolling horizon heuristic to split huge problem instances into smaller subproblems and solve them independently to optimality. By letting the horizons of the subproblems overlap, it is possible to look ahead to the demand of the next subproblem. We prove that composing the solutions of the subproblems yields an optimal solution to the whole problem if the overlap of the horizons is sufficiently large. Our experiments show that this approach is not only suitable for solving extremely large instances that are intractable as a whole, but it is also possible to decrease the solution time for large instances compared to a comprehensive approach.

Abstract A promising new delivery model involves the use of a delivery truck that collaborates with a drone to make deliveries. Effectively combining a truck and a drone gives rise to a new planning problem that is known as the traveling salesman problem with drone (TSP‐D). This paper presents exact solution approaches for the TSP‐D based on dynamic programming and provides an experimental comparison of these approaches. Our numerical experiments show that our approach can solve larger problems than the mathematical programming approaches that have been presented in the literature thus far. Moreover, we show that restrictions on the number of locations the truck can visit while the drone is away can help significantly reduce the solution times while having relatively little impact on the overall solution quality.

We consider multi‐objective shortest path problems in which the edge lengths are uncertain. Different concepts for finding so‐called robust efficient solutions for multi‐objective robust optimization exist. In this article, we consider multi‐scenario efficiency, flimsily and highly robust efficiency, and point‐based and set‐based minmax robust efficiency. Labeling algorithms are an important class of algorithms for multi‐objective (deterministic) shortest path problems. We analyze why it is, for most of the considered concepts, not straightforward to use labeling algorithms to find robust efficient solutions. We then show two approaches to extend a generic multi‐objective label correcting algorithm for these cases. We finally present extensive numerical results on the performance of the proposed algorithms.

To model and solve optimization problems arising in public transportation, data about the passengers are necessary and have to be included in the models in any phase of the planning process. Many approaches assume a two‐step procedure: in a first step, the data about the passengers are distributed over the public transportation network (PTN) using traffic‐assignment procedures. In a second step, the actual planning of lines, timetables, and so forth takes place. This approach ignores that, assuming that the network is sufficiently dense, for most passengers, there are many possible ways to reach their destinations in the PTN, thus the actual connections the passengers will take strongly depend on the decisions made during the planning phase. In this article, we investigate the influence of integrating the traffic assignment procedure in the optimization process on the complexity of the line planning problem. Our objective is to maximize the passengers' benefit, namely to minimize the overall travel time of the passengers in the network. We present new models and systematically analyze their complexities. Exploiting a relation to the resource‐constrained shortest path problem, we are able to derive pseudopolynomial and polynomial algorithms for special cases. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 65(3), 228–243 2015

Timetable information is the process of determining a suitable travel route for a passenger. Due to delays in the original timetable, in practice it often happens that the travel route cannot be used as originally planned. For a passenger being already en route, it would hence be useful to know about alternatives that ensure that his/her destination can be reached. In this work we propose a recoverable robust approach to timetable information; i.e., we aim at finding travel routes that can easily be updated when delays occur during the journey. We present polynomial-time algorithms for this problem and evaluate the performance of the routes obtained this way on schedule data of the German train network of 2013 and simulated delay scenarios.

The question of delay management (DM) is whether trains should wait for delayed feeder trains or should depart on time. Solutions to this problem strongly depend on the capacity constraints of the tracks making sure that no two trains can use the same piece of track at the same time. While these capacity constraints have been included in integer programming formulations for DM, the capacity constraints of the stations (only offering a limited number of platforms) have been neglected so far. This can lead to highly infeasible solutions. In order to overcome this problem we suggest two new formulations for DM both including the stations' capacities. We present numerical results showing that the assignment-based formulation is clearly superior to the packing formulation. We furthermore propose an iterative algorithm in which we improve the platform assignment with respect to the current delays of the trains at each station in each step. We will show that this subproblem asks for coloring the nodes of a graph with a given number of colors while minimizing the weight of the conflicts. We show that the graph to be colored is an interval graph and that the problem can be solved in polynomial time by presenting a totally unimodular IP formulation.

In timetable information in public transport the goal is to search for a good passenger's path between an origin and a destination. Usually, the travel time and the number of transfers shall be minimized. In this paper, we consider robust timetable information, i.e. we want to identify a path which will bring the passenger to the planned destination even in the case of delays. The classic notion of strict robustness leads to the problem of identifying those changing activities which will never break in any of the expected delay scenarios. We show that this is in general a strongly NP-hard problem. Therefore, we propose a conservative heuristic which identifies a large subset of these robust changing activities in polynomial time by dynamic programming and so allows us to find strictly robust paths efficiently. We also transfer the notion of light robustness, originally introduced for timetabling, to timetable information. In computational experiments we then study the price of strict and light robustness: How much longer is the travel time of a robust path than of a shortest one according to the published schedule? Based on the schedule of high-speed trains within Germany of 2011, we quantitatively explore the trade-off between the level of guaranteed robustness and the increase in travel time. Strict robustness turns out to be too conservative, while light robustness is promising: a modest level of guarantees is achievable at a reasonable price for the majority of passengers.

To model and solve optimization problems arising in public transportation, data about the passengers is necessary and has to be included in the models in any phase of the planning process. Many approaches assume a two-step procedure: in a first step, the data about the passengers is distributed over the public transportation network using traffic-assignment procedures. In a second step, the actual planning of lines, timetables, etc. takes place. This approach ignores that for most passengers there are many possible ways to reach their destinations in the public transportation network, thus the actual connections the passengers will take depend strongly on the decisions made during the planning phase. In this paper we investigate the influence of integrating the traffic assignment procedure in the optimization process on the complexity of line planning and aperiodic timetabling. In both problems, our objective is to maximize the passengers' benefit, namely to minimize the overall travel time of the passengers in the network. We present new models, analyze NP-hardness results arising from the integration of the routing decisions in the traditional models, and derive polynomial algorithms for special cases.