Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Stephan Gammeter

dblp:20/788 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
3D vision · 50% Image recognition and object detection · 28% Video understanding and tracking · 22%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval
image retrieval
0.112011
Hello neighbor: Accurate object retrieval with k-reciprocal nearest neighbors · CVPR 2011
Information retrieval › similarity search
nearest neighbor search
0.112011
Hello neighbor: Accurate object retrieval with k-reciprocal nearest neighbors · CVPR 2011
Information retrieval › image retrieval
object retrieval
0.112011
Hello neighbor: Accurate object retrieval with k-reciprocal nearest neighbors · CVPR 2011
Information retrieval
reranking
0.112011
Hello neighbor: Accurate object retrieval with k-reciprocal nearest neighbors · CVPR 2011
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.112011
Hello neighbor: Accurate object retrieval with k-reciprocal nearest neighbors · CVPR 2011
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.112010
Size Does Matter: Improving Object Recognition and 3D Reconstruction with Cross-Media Analysis of Image Clusters · ECCV (1) 2010
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
object recognition
0.112010
Size Does Matter: Improving Object Recognition and 3D Reconstruction with Cross-Media Analysis of Image Clusters · ECCV (1) 2010
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image annotation
0.112009
I know what you did last summer: object-level auto-annotation of holiday snaps · ICCV 2009
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d scene understanding
0.112008
Articulated Multi-body Tracking under Egomotion · ECCV (2) 2008
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
object tracking
0.112008
Articulated Multi-body Tracking under Egomotion · ECCV (2) 2008
Information retrieval
indexing
0.012009
I know what you did last summer: object-level auto-annotation of holiday snaps · ICCV 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

visual vocabulary indexing · 0.2object retrieval · 0.2multi-modal labeling · 0.2distance measure adaptation · 0.1bag-of-words · 0.1cross-media analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Hello neighbor: Accurate object retrieval with k-reciprocal nearest neighbors
abstract
This paper introduces a simple yet effective method to improve visual word based image retrieval. Our method is based on an analysis of the k-reciprocal nearest neighbor structure in the image space. At query time the information obtained from this process is used to treat different parts of the ranked retrieval list with different distance measures. This leads effectively to a re-ranking of retrieved images. As we will show, this has two benefits: first, using different similarity measures for different parts of the ranked list allows for compensation of the “curse of dimensionality”. Second, it allows for dealing with the uneven distribution of images in the data space. Dealing with both challenges has very beneficial effect on retrieval accuracy. Furthermore, a major part of the process happens offline, so it does not affect speed at retrieval time. Finally, the method operates on the bag-of-words level only, thus it could be combined with any additional measures on e.g. either descriptor level or feature geometry making room for further improvement. We evaluate our approach on common object retrieval benchmarks and demonstrate a significant improvement over standard bag-of-words retrieval.
Danfeng Qin, Stephan Gammeter, Lukas Bossard, Till Quack, Luc Van Gool
CVPR2
2010 Size Does Matter: Improving Object Recognition and 3D Reconstruction with Cross-Media Analysis of Image Clusters
Stephan Gammeter, Till Quack, David Tingdahl, Luc Van Gool
ECCV (1)1
2009 I know what you did last summer: object-level auto-annotation of holiday snaps
abstract
The state-of-the art in visual object retrieval from large databases allows to search millions of images on the object level. Recently, complementary works have proposed systems to crawl large object databases from community photo collections on the Internet. We combine these two lines of work to a large-scale system for auto-annotation of holiday snaps. The resulting method allows for automatic labeling objects such as landmark buildings, scenes, pieces of art etc. at the object level in a fully automatic manner. The labeling is multi-modal and consists of textual tags, geographic location, and related content on the Internet. Furthermore, the efficiency of the retrieval process is optimized by creating more compact and precise indices for visual vocabularies using background information obtained in the crawling stage of the system. We demonstrate the scalability and precision of the proposed method by conducting experiments on millions of images downloaded from community photo collections on the Internet.
Stephan Gammeter, Lukas Bossard, Till Quack, Luc Van Gool
ICCV1
2008 Articulated Multi-body Tracking under Egomotion
Stephan Gammeter, Andreas Ess, Tobias Jaeggli, Konrad Schindler, Bastian Leibe, Luc Van Gool
ECCV (2)1