Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michal Polic

dblp:200/1041 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-3993-337XORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 6 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
4 papers
Computational photography and imaging · 65% Image and video processing · 22% Geometric modeling and processing · 13%
Artificial intelligence
3 papers
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing
3d reconstruction
0.712023
A Large-Scale Homography Benchmark · CVPR 2023
Computational photography and imaging
camera geometry
0.712023
A Large-Scale Homography Benchmark · CVPR 2023
Image and video processing › image matching
correspondence pruning
0.712023
A Large-Scale Homography Benchmark · CVPR 2023
Computational photography and imaging › camera geometry
homography estimation
0.712023
A Large-Scale Homography Benchmark · CVPR 2023
Computational photography and imaging › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation
0.712023
A Large-Scale Homography Benchmark · CVPR 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › multi-view geometry
camera geometry
0.412020
From Two Rolling Shutters to One Global Shutter · CVPR 2020
Computer vision › 3D vision
rolling shutter correction
0.412020
From Two Rolling Shutters to One Global Shutter · CVPR 2020
Image and video processing › image matching
affine invariant matching
0.412020
Making Affine Correspondences Work in Camera Geometry Computation · ECCV (11) 2020
Computational photography and imaging
camera calibration
0.412020
Making Affine Correspondences Work in Camera Geometry Computation · ECCV (11) 2020
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d reconstruction
0.312018
Fast and Accurate Camera Covariance Computation for Large 3D Reconstruction · ECCV (2) 2018
Computer vision › 3D vision › feature matching
point correspondence
0.112020
From Two Rolling Shutters to One Global Shutter · CVPR 2020
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion
0.112020
Uncertainty Based Camera Model Selection · CVPR 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty evaluation · 0.9point correspondence · 0.9machine learning · 0.9information criterion · 0.9geometric constraint solving · 0.9deep learning · 0.7SIFT · 0.7camera geometry · 0.4affine correspondence · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 A Large-Scale Homography Benchmark
abstract
We present a large-scale dataset of Planes in 3D, Pi3D, of roughly 1000 planes observed in 10 000 images from the 1DSfM dataset, and HEB, a large-scale homography estimation benchmark leveraging Pi3D. The applications of the Pi3D dataset are diverse, e.g. training or evaluating monocular depth, surface normal estimation and image matching algorithms. The HEB dataset consists of 226 260 homographies and includes roughly 4M correspondences. The homographies link images that often undergo significant viewpoint and illumination changes. As applications of HEB, we perform a rigorous evaluation of a wide range of robust estimators and deep learning-based correspondence filtering methods, establishing the current state-of-the-art in robust homography estimation. We also evaluate the uncertainty of the SIFT orientations and scales w.r.t. the ground truth coming from the underlying homographies and provide codes for comparing uncertainty of custom detectors. The dataset is available at https://github.com/danini/homography-benchmark.
Daniel Barath, Dmytro Mishkin, Michal Polic, Wolfgang Förstner, Jiri Matas
CVPR3
2020 From Two Rolling Shutters to One Global Shutter
abstract
Most consumer cameras are equipped with electronic rolling shutter, leading to image distortions when the camera moves during image capture. We explore a surprisingly simple camera configuration that makes it possible to undo the rolling shutter distortion: two cameras mounted to have different rolling shutter directions. Such a setup is easy and cheap to build and it possesses the geometric constraints needed to correct rolling shutter distortion using only a sparse set of point correspondences between the two images. We derive equations that describe the underlying geometry for general and special motions and present an efficient method for finding their solutions. Our synthetic and real experiments demonstrate that our approach is able to remove large rolling shutter distortions of all types without relying on any specific scene structure.
Cenek Albl, Zuzana Kukelova, Viktor Larsson, Michal Polic, Tomás Pajdla, Konrad Schindler
CVPR4
2020 Uncertainty Based Camera Model Selection
abstract
The quality and speed of Structure from Motion (SfM) methods depend significantly on the camera model chosen for the reconstruction. In most of the SfM pipelines, the camera model is manually chosen by the user. In this paper, we present a new automatic method for camera model selection in large scale SfM that is based on efficient uncertainty evaluation. We first perform an extensive comparison of classical model selection based on known Information Criteria and show that they do not provide sufficiently accurate results when applied to camera model selection. Then we propose a new Accuracy-based Criterion, which evaluates an efficient approximation of the uncertainty of the estimated parameters in tested models. Using the new criterion, we design a camera model selection method and fine-tune it by machine learning. Our simulated and real experiments demonstrate a significant increase in reconstruction quality as well as a considerable speedup of the SfM process.
Michal Polic, Stanislav Steidl, Cenek Albl, Zuzana Kukelova, Tomás Pajdla
CVPR1
2020 Making Affine Correspondences Work in Camera Geometry Computation
Daniel Barath, Michal Polic, Wolfgang Förstner, Torsten Sattler, Tomás Pajdla, Zuzana Kukelova
ECCV (11)2
2018 Fast and Accurate Camera Covariance Computation for Large 3D Reconstruction
Michal Polic, Wolfgang Förstner, Tomás Pajdla
ECCV (2)1
2017 Camera Uncertainty Computation in Large 3D Reconstruction
abstract
In computer vision, large scale Structure from Motion pipelines do not often evaluate the quality of the reconstruction by error propagation from measurements to the estimated parameters. It is a numerically sensitive and computationally challenging process, which is not easy to implement in practice for large scenes. We present a new algorithm that increases the numerical precision of the uncertainty propagation. It works with millions of feature points, thousands of cameras and millions of 3D points on a single computer. We provide an experimental comparison of our approach, as well as of previous approaches, on accurate ground truth and demonstrate that our algorithm is practical.
Michal Polic, Tomás Pajdla
3DV1