Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kaili Liu

dblp:200/1206 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Language models and text generation · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
1.012026
SciCustom: A Framework for Custom Evaluation of Scientific Capabilities in Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2026
Medical and health informatics › medical report generation
radiology report generation
1.012026
EviRAG: Evidence-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medical Vision-Language Models · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
1.012026
EviRAG: Evidence-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medical Vision-Language Models · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval
multimodal retrieval
0.312026
EviRAG: Evidence-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medical Vision-Language Models · SIGIR 2026
Information retrieval › cross-modal retrieval
vision-language retrieval
0.312026
EviRAG: Evidence-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medical Vision-Language Models · SIGIR 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

vision-language model · 2.0structured triplet alignment · 2.0dense embedding similarity · 2.0automatic evaluation generation · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 SciCustom: A Framework for Custom Evaluation of Scientific Capabilities in Large Language Models
abstract
Yiyang Gu, Junwei Yang, Junyu Luo, Ye Yuan, Bin Feng, Yingce Xia, Shufang Xie, Kaili Liu, Bohan Wu, Qi Shi, Haoran Li, Beier Xiao, Zhiping Xiao, Xiao Luo, Weizhi Zhang, Philip S. Yu, Zequn Liu, Ming Zhang. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Yiyang Gu, Junyu Luo 0002, Ye Yuan 0016, Yingce Xia, Shufang Xie 0003, Kaili Liu, Bohan Wu, Haoran Li 0003, Beier Xiao, Zhiping Xiao 0001, Xiao Luo 0001, Weizhi Zhang 0001, Philip S. Yu, Zequn Liu, Ming Zhang 0004
ACL (1)8
2026 EviRAG: Evidence-Guided Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Medical Vision-Language Models
abstract
Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is widely adopted for radiology report generation with medical vision-language models, leveraging external reports as linguistic references. However, existing RAG methods rely primarily on dense embedding similarity, which may retrieve reports that are semantically related yet clinically inconsistent with respect to presence or laterality constraints. Such inconsistencies are often propagated into generation, resulting in contradictory or unsupported findings. We propose an evidence-guided retrieval-augmented framework EviRAG that decomposes retrieval into structured and unstructured alignment levels. First, we induce structured clinical triplets from both query and database cases through targeted visual interrogation, projecting images into a shared evidence space. Triplet-level alignment enforces explicit agreement over presence and laterality variables, yielding a clinically admissible candidate set via structural ranking. Within this constrained space, we perform semantic alignment in a shared multimodal embedding space to capture nuanced descriptive correspondence. The top-ranked reports and query image are jointly fed into a medical vision-language model for report generation. Comprehensive experiments on radiology report generation benchmarks show that EviRAG substantially reduces clinical inconsistencies compared to strong medical vision-language baselines. The source code is available at https://github.com/liamgu06/EviRAG.
Yiyang Gu, Jiayue Fan, Kaili Liu, Bohan Wu, Binqi Chen, Zequn Liu, Zhiping Xiao 0001, Rongcheng Tu, Xiao Luo 0001, Ming Zhang 0004
SIGIR3
2026 CMF2Net: Cross-modal feature fusion model for breast tumor segmentation in dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MRI
Siyao Du, Zeyan Xu, Zhen Zhang 0058, Zhitao Wei, Chinting Wong, Yanting Liang, Kaili Liu, Peng Xu 0004, Zaiyi Liu, Zhenwei Shi 0002
Expert Syst. Appl.8
2017 Comparison of three modeling methods for estimating forest biomass using TM, GLAS and field measurement data
abstract
Medium spatial resolution biomass is a crucial link from the plot to regional and global scales. Although remote-sensing data-based methods have become a primary approach in estimating forest aboveground biomass (AGB), many difficulties remain in data resources and prediction approaches [1, 2]. Each kind of sensor type and prediction method has its own merits and limitations. To select the proper estimation algorithm and remote-sensing data source, several forest AGB models were developed using different remote-sensing data sources (Geoscience Laser Altimeter System (GLAS) data and Thematic Mapper (TM) data) and 108 field measurements. Three modeling methods (stepwise regression (SR), support vector regression (SVR) and random forest (RF))were used to estimate forest AGB over the Daxing'anling Mountains in northeastern China. The results of models using different datasets and three approaches were compared. The random forest AGB model using Landsat5/TM as input data was shown to estimate AGB reliably by regression (R2=0.96 RMSE=17.73Mg/ha) and cross validation (R2=0.71 RMSE=39.60 Mg/ha).
Kaili Liu, Jindi Wang, Weisheng Zeng, Jinling Song
IGARSS1