Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Yijun Dong

dblp:200/1432 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
5as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Efficient and distributed learning · 32% Learning theory · 27% Trustworthy machine learning · 15%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds
1.622025
Discrepancies are Virtue: Weak-to-Strong Generalization through Lens of Intrinsic Dimension · ICML 2025
Sketchy Moment Matching: Toward Fast and Provable Data Selection for Finetuning · NeurIPS 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment › scalable oversight
weak-to-strong generalization
0.912025
Discrepancies are Virtue: Weak-to-Strong Generalization through Lens of Intrinsic Dimension · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical learning theory
bias-variance tradeoff
0.812024
Sketchy Moment Matching: Toward Fast and Provable Data Selection for Finetuning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection
0.812024
Sketchy Moment Matching: Toward Fast and Provable Data Selection for Finetuning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data selection
data selection for fine-tuning
0.812024
Sketchy Moment Matching: Toward Fast and Provable Data Selection for Finetuning · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distributionally robust optimization
0.712023
Adaptively Weighted Data Augmentation Consistency Regularization for Robust Optimization under Concept Shift · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation
0.712023
Cluster-aware Semi-supervised Learning: Relational Knowledge Distillation Provably Learns Clustering · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › knowledge distillation
relational knowledge distillation
0.712023
Cluster-aware Semi-supervised Learning: Relational Knowledge Distillation Provably Learns Clustering · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.712023
Adaptively Weighted Data Augmentation Consistency Regularization for Robust Optimization under Concept Shift · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
semi-supervised learning
0.712023
Cluster-aware Semi-supervised Learning: Relational Knowledge Distillation Provably Learns Clustering · NeurIPS 2023
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph clustering
spectral clustering
0.712023
Cluster-aware Semi-supervised Learning: Relational Knowledge Distillation Provably Learns Clustering · NeurIPS 2023
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis
medical image segmentation
0.212023
Adaptively Weighted Data Augmentation Consistency Regularization for Robust Optimization under Concept Shift · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

data augmentation consistency regularization · 2.0online mirror descent · 1.3ridgeless regression · 0.9intrinsic dimension analysis · 0.9moment matching · 0.8low-rank approximation · 0.8gradient sketching · 0.8spectral clustering · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Discrepancies are Virtue: Weak-to-Strong Generalization through Lens of Intrinsic Dimension
abstract
Weak-to-strong (W2S) generalization is a type of finetuning (FT) where a strong (large) student model is trained on pseudo-labels generated by a weak teacher. Surprisingly, W2S FT often outperforms the weak teacher. We seek to understand this phenomenon through the observation that FT often occurs in intrinsically low-dimensional spaces. Leveraging the low intrinsic dimensionality of FT, we analyze W2S in the ridgeless regression setting from a variance reduction perspective. For a strong student-weak teacher pair with sufficiently expressive low-dimensional feature subspaces $\mathcal{V}_s, \mathcal{V}_w$, we provide an exact characterization of the variance that dominates the generalization error of W2S. This unveils a virtue of discrepancy between the strong and weak models in W2S: the variance of the weak teacher is inherited by the strong student in $\mathcal{V}_s \cap \mathcal{V}_w$, while reduced by a factor of $\mathrm{dim}(\mathcal{V}_s)/N$ in the subspace of discrepancy $\mathcal{V}_w \setminus \mathcal{V}_s$ with $N$ pseudo-labels for W2S. Our analysis further casts light on the sample complexities and the scaling of performance gap recovery in W2S. The analysis is supported by experiments on synthetic regression problems, as well as real vision and NLP tasks.
Yijun Dong, Yunai Li, Jason D. Lee
ICML1
2024 Sketchy Moment Matching: Toward Fast and Provable Data Selection for Finetuning
abstract
We revisit data selection in a modern context of finetuning from a fundamental perspective. Extending the classical wisdom of variance minimization in low dimensions to high-dimensional finetuning, our generalization analysis unveils the importance of additionally reducing bias induced by low-rank approximation. Inspired by the variance-bias tradeoff in high dimensions from the theory, we introduce Sketchy Moment Matching (SkMM), a scalable data selection scheme with two stages. (i) First, the bias is controlled using gradient sketching that explores the finetuning parameter space for an informative low-dimensional subspace $\mathcal{S}$; (ii) then the variance is reduced over $\mathcal{S}$ via moment matching between the original and selected datasets. Theoretically, we show that gradient sketching is fast and provably accurate: selecting $n$ samples by reducing variance over $\mathcal{S}$ preserves the fast-rate generalization $O(\dim(\mathcal{S})/n)$, independent of the parameter dimension. Empirically, we concretize the variance-bias balance via synthetic experiments and demonstrate the effectiveness of SkMM for finetuning in real vision tasks.
Yijun Dong, Viet Hoang Phan, Xiang Pan 0001
NeurIPS1
2023 Sample Efficiency of Data Augmentation Consistency Regularization
abstract
Data augmentation is popular in the training of large neural networks; however, currently, theoretical understanding of the discrepancy between different algorithmic choices of leveraging augmented data remains limited. In this paper, we take a step in this direction – we first present a simple and novel analysis for linear regression with label invariant augmentations, demonstrating that data augmentation consistency (DAC) is intrinsically more efficient than empirical risk minimization on augmented data (DA-ERM). The analysis is then generalized to misspecified augmentations (i.e., augmentations that change the labels), which again demonstrates the merit of DAC over DA-ERM. Further, we extend our analysis to non-linear models (e.g., neural networks) and present generalization bounds. Finally, we perform experiments that make a clean and apples-to-apples comparison (i.e., with no extra modeling or data tweaks) between DAC and DA-ERM using CIFAR-100 and WideResNet; these together demonstrate the superior efficacy of DAC.
Yijun Dong, Rachel A. Ward, Inderjit S. Dhillon, Sujay Sanghavi
AISTATS2
2023 Adaptively Weighted Data Augmentation Consistency Regularization for Robust Optimization under Concept Shift
abstract
Concept shift is a prevailing problem in natural tasks like medical image segmentation where samples usually come from different subpopulations with variant correlations between features and labels. One common type of concept shift in medical image segmentation is the "information imbalance" between label-sparse samples with few (if any) segmentation labels and label-dense samples with plentiful labeled pixels. Existing distributionally robust algorithms have focused on adaptively truncating/down-weighting the "less informative" (i.e., label-sparse in our context) samples. To exploit data features of label-sparse samples more efficiently, we propose an adaptively weighted online optimization algorithm — AdaWAC — to incorporate data augmentation consistency regularization in sample reweighting. Our method introduces a set of trainable weights to balance the supervised loss and unsupervised consistency regularization of each sample separately. At the saddle point of the underlying objective, the weights assign label-dense samples to the supervised loss and label-sparse samples to the unsupervised consistency regularization. We provide a convergence guarantee by recasting the optimization as online mirror descent on a saddle point problem. Our empirical results demonstrate that AdaWAC not only enhances the segmentation performance and sample efficiency but also improves the robustness to concept shift on various medical image segmentation tasks with different UNet-style backbones.
Yijun Dong, Yuege Xie, Rachel A. Ward
ICML1
2023 PI-Parking: A Physics Informed Neural Network Approach for Parking Availability Prediction
abstract
Parking availability prediction is an important part of urban intelligent transportation systems (ITS), which allows drivers to be informed of the parking availability in advance, thereby reducing cruising for parking time and reducing pollution emissions. However, existing studies of parking availability prediction rarely incorporate the effect of price factors and cannot be trained to obtain the price elasticity of parking demand. In this paper, we propose a neural network-based approach called physics-informed parking (PI-parking). The model employs physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) to add price information into model training, which not only achieves the parking availability prediction, but also calculates the price elasticity of demand of different parking lots during the training process. On the SF Park project, experiment results show that our model outperforms 17.711% on average than compared models. For price elasticity of parking demand, we find that the values are distributed between 0.02 and 0.31, and most of the values are between 0.25 and 0.27. In addition, there is a similarity in the elasticity values for adjacent neighborhoods.
Yijun Dong, Haoxuan Kuang, Jun Li 0105
ICPADS1
2023 Cluster-aware Semi-supervised Learning: Relational Knowledge Distillation Provably Learns Clustering
abstract
Despite the empirical success and practical significance of (relational) knowledge distillation that matches (the relations of) features between teacher and student models, the corresponding theoretical interpretations remain limited for various knowledge distillation paradigms. In this work, we take an initial step toward a theoretical understanding of relational knowledge distillation (RKD), with a focus on semi-supervised classification problems. We start by casting RKD as spectral clustering on a population-induced graph unveiled by a teacher model. Via a notion of clustering error that quantifies the discrepancy between the predicted and ground truth clusterings, we illustrate that RKD over the population provably leads to low clustering error. Moreover, we provide a sample complexity bound for RKD with limited unlabeled samples. For semi-supervised learning, we further demonstrate the label efficiency of RKD through a general framework of cluster-aware semi-supervised learning that assumes low clustering errors. Finally, by unifying data augmentation consistency regularization into this cluster-aware framework, we show that despite the common effect of learning accurate clusterings, RKD facilitates a "global" perspective through spectral clustering, whereas consistency regularization focuses on a "local" perspective via expansion.
Yijun Dong, Rachel Ward
NeurIPS1