Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Katherine Ye

dblp:200/5385 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 50% Geometric modeling and processing · 50%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
User interface design and tools · 77% Design research and methods · 23%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Programming languages and type systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Geometric modeling and processing › computer-aided design
constraint-based modeling
0.412020
Penrose: from mathematical notation to beautiful diagrams · ACM Trans. Graph. 2020
User interface design and tools › interactive graphics system
diagram editing
0.412020
How Domain Experts Create Conceptual Diagrams and Implications for Tool Design · CHI 2020
Design research and methods › user research
interview study
0.112020
How Domain Experts Create Conceptual Diagrams and Implications for Tool Design · CHI 2020
Programming languages and type systems › domain-specific languages
constraint language
0.112020
Penrose: from mathematical notation to beautiful diagrams · ACM Trans. Graph. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

constrained numerical optimization · 0.9semi-structured interviews · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Search Atlas: Visualizing Divergent Search Results Across Geopolitical Borders
abstract
The internet is full of invisible borders—geographic, linguistic, cultural, political—that circumscribe the information each user sees. Search engines shape such “information borders” by tailoring results according to geolocation, language, and other user profiling. We present Search Atlas, a tool paired with visualizations that enable users to see and cross these borders. For instance, how do search results for the same query differ for Brazilian, Turkish, and Indian users? Given a query, the tool displays multiple lists of Google search results, highlighting distinctive words for each set of parameters. Then, we provide visu- alizations that juxtapose and cluster Google results across countries, revealing new information borders and regions that can vary widely depending on the query. By exposing the partial perspective of a search engine, Search Atlas invites users to experience the internet from divergent positions and to reflect on how their online lives are conditioned by technologi- cal infrastructures and geopolitical regimes.
Rodrigo Ochigame, Katherine Ye
Conference on Designing Interactive Systems2
2020 How Domain Experts Create Conceptual Diagrams and Implications for Tool Design
abstract
Conceptual diagrams are used extensively to understand abstract relationships, explain complex ideas, and solve difficult problems. To illustrate concepts effectively, experts find appropriate visual representations and translate concepts into concrete shapes. This translation step is not supported explicitly by current diagramming tools. This paper investigates how domain experts create conceptual diagrams via semi-structured interviews with 18 participants from diverse backgrounds. Our participants create, adapt, and reuse visual representations using both sketches and digital tools. However, they had trouble using current diagramming tools to transition from sketches and reuse components from earlier diagrams. Our participants also expressed frustration with the slow feedback cycles and barriers to automation of their tools. Based on these results, we suggest four opportunities of diagramming tools — exploration support, representation salience, live engagement, and vocabulary correspondence — that together enable a natural diagramming experience. Finally, we discuss possibilities to leverage recent research advances to develop natural diagramming tools.
Dor Ma'ayan, Wode Ni, Katherine Ye, Chinmay Kulkarni 0001, Joshua Sunshine
CHI3
2020 Penrose: from mathematical notation to beautiful diagrams
abstract
We introduce a system called Penrose for creating mathematical diagrams. Its basic functionality is to translate abstract statements written in familiar math-like notation into one or more possible visual representations. Rather than rely on a fixed library of visualization tools, the visual representation is user-defined in a constraint-based specification language; diagrams are then generated automatically via constrained numerical optimization. The system is user-extensible to many domains of mathematics, and is fast enough for iterative design exploration. In contrast to tools that specify diagrams via direct manipulation or low-level graphics programming, Penrose enables rapid creation and exploration of diagrams that faithfully preserve the underlying mathematical meaning. We demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of the system by showing how it can be used to illustrate a diverse set of concepts from mathematics and computer graphics.
Katherine Ye, Wode Ni, Max Krieger, Dor Ma'ayan, Jenna DiVincenzo, Jonathan Aldrich, Joshua Sunshine, Keenan Crane
ACM Trans. Graph.1