Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

M. Tobis

dblp:200/5601 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications › equalization
decision feedback equalization
0.011985
Comparison of DFE and MLSE Receiver Performance on HF Channels · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1985
Physical-layer communications
equalization
0.011985
Comparison of DFE and MLSE Receiver Performance on HF Channels · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1985
Physical-layer communications › fading channels
HF channel
0.011985
Comparison of DFE and MLSE Receiver Performance on HF Channels · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1985
Physical-layer communications › signal detection › sequence estimation
maximum-likelihood sequence estimation
0.011985
Comparison of DFE and MLSE Receiver Performance on HF Channels · IEEE Trans. Commun. 1985
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1985 Comparison of DFE and MLSE Receiver Performance on HF Channels
abstract
Data communication at rates near or above 2 kbits/s on 3 kHz-baadwidth HF radio channels is subject to impairment from severe linear dispersion, rapid channel time variation, and severe fading. In this investigation, recorded 2.4 kbit/s QPSK signals received from HF channels were processed to extract a time-varying estimate of the channel impulse response. From the estimated channel impulse responses, performance-related parameters were computed for ideal matched filter reception, maximum-likelihood sequence-estimation (MLSE), and decision feedback equalization (DFE). The results indicated that the simpler DFE receiver suffered only a small theoretical performance degradation relative to the more complex MLSE receiver. Other HF channel impulse response statistics were also obtained to shed light on equalization and filter adaptation techniques.
David D. Falconer, Asrar U. H. Sheikh, Evangelos Eleftheriou, M. Tobis
IEEE Trans. Commun.4