Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

David Hemmi

dblp:200/7267 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
4as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Planning, search and constraint satisfaction · 83% Optimization for machine learning · 17%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint optimization
0.722018
A Recursive Scenario Decomposition Algorithm for Combinatorial Multistage Stochastic Optimisation Problems · AAAI 2018
Decomposition-Based Solving Approaches for Stochastic Constraint Optimisation · AAAI 2018
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization › stochastic programming
multistage stochastic programming
0.722018
A Recursive Scenario Decomposition Algorithm for Combinatorial Multistage Stochastic Optimisation Problems · AAAI 2018
Decomposition-Based Solving Approaches for Stochastic Constraint Optimisation · AAAI 2018
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic programming
0.722018
A Recursive Scenario Decomposition Algorithm for Combinatorial Multistage Stochastic Optimisation Problems · AAAI 2018
Decomposition-Based Solving Approaches for Stochastic Constraint Optimisation · AAAI 2018
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization
0.312018
A Recursive Scenario Decomposition Algorithm for Combinatorial Multistage Stochastic Optimisation Problems · AAAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint optimization
stochastic constraint optimization
0.312018
Decomposition-Based Solving Approaches for Stochastic Constraint Optimisation · AAAI 2018
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction
constraint programming
0.312017
Stochastic Constraint Programming · IJCAI 2017
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › constraint programming
stochastic constraint programming
0.312017
Stochastic Constraint Programming · IJCAI 2017
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.312017
Stochastic Constraint Programming · IJCAI 2017
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
stochastic combinatorial optimization
0.312017
Stochastic Constraint Programming · IJCAI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

scenario decomposition · 1.3parallel solving · 0.7constraint programming · 0.7scenario-based uncertainty modeling · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Decomposition-Based Solving Approaches for Stochastic Constraint Optimisation
abstract
Combinatorial optimisation problems often contain uncertainty that has to be taken into account to produce realistic solutions. A common way to describe the uncertainty is by means of scenarios, where each scenario describes different potential sets of problem parameters based on random distributions or historical data. While efficient algorithmic techniques exist for specific problem classes such as linear programs, there are very few approaches that can handle general Constraint Programming formulations subject to uncertainty. The goal of my PhD is to develop generic methods for solving stochastic combinatorial optimisation problems formulated in a Constraint Programming framework.
David Hemmi
AAAI1
2018 A Recursive Scenario Decomposition Algorithm for Combinatorial Multistage Stochastic Optimisation Problems
abstract
Stochastic programming is concerned with decision making under uncertainty, seeking an optimal policy with respect to a set of possible future scenarios. This paper looks at multistage decision problems where the uncertainty is revealed over time. First, decisions are made with respect to all possible future scenarios. Secondly, after observing the random variables, a set of scenario specific decisions is taken. Our goal is to develop algorithms that can be used as a back-end solver for high-level modeling languages. In this paper we propose a scenario decomposition method to solve multistage stochastic combinatorial decision problems recursively. Our approach is applicable to general problem structures, utilizes standard solving technology and is highly parallelizable. We provide experimental results to show how it efficiently solves benchmarks with hundreds of scenarios.
David Hemmi, Guido Tack, Mark Wallace 0001
AAAI1
2017 Scenario-Based Learning for Stochastic Combinatorial Optimisation
David Hemmi, Guido Tack, Mark Wallace 0001
CPAIOR1
2017 Stochastic Constraint Programming
abstract
Combinatorial optimisation problems often contain uncertainty that has to be taken into account to pro- duce realistic solutions. One way of describing the uncertainty is using scenarios, where each sce- nario describes different potential sets of problem parameters based on random distributions or his- torical data. While efficient algorithmic techniques exist for specific problem classes such as linear pro- grams, there are very few approaches that can han- dle general Constraint Programming formulations with uncertainty. The goal of my PhD is to develop generic methods for solving stochastic combina- torial optimisation problems formulated in a Con- straint Programming framework.
David Hemmi
IJCAI1