Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Egon E. Loebner

dblp:200/7438 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1982
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Database system architecture and tuning · 51% Data models and query languages · 34% Query processing and optimization · 15%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 50% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
logical form
0.011982
Processing English with a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar · ACL 1982
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
semantic parsing
0.011982
Processing English with a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar · ACL 1982
Database system architecture and tuning
relational database system
0.011981
Building and accessing an REL database · CHI (2) 1981

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

montague semantics · 0.0generalized phrase structure grammar · 0.0exploratory investigation · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1982 Processing English with a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar
abstract
This paper describes a natural language processing system implemented at Hewlett-Packard's Computer Research Center. The system's main components are: a Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar (GPSG); a top-down parser; a logic transducer that outputs a first-order logical representation; and a "disambiguator" that uses sortal information to convert "normal-form" first-order logical expressions into the query language for HIRE, a relational database hosted in the SPHERE system. We argue that theoretical developments in GPSG syntax and in Montague semantics have specific advantages to bring to this domain of computational linguistics. The syntax and semantics of the system are totally domain-independent, and thus, in principle, highly portable. We discuss the prospects for extending domain-independence to the lexical semantics as well, and thus to the logical semantic representations.
Jean Mark Gawron, Jonathan King, John Lamping, Egon E. Loebner, E. Anne Paulson, Geoffrey K. Pullum, Ivan A. Sag, Thomas Wasow
ACL4
1981 Building and accessing an REL database
Steve Gadol, Egon E. Loebner
CHI (2)2
1981 Living taxonomies in the corporate world: The need for multinested data models
abstract
The complexity of information processing, disseminating and controlling is very high within a sizable corporation. Database design, targeted to carry out these functions, is constantly improving. Nevertheless, nonprogrammers have trouble accessing most databases. Layers of EDP personnel, as well as unresponsive and cumbersome systems, are an obstacle to effective database use.In this paper, we describe an exploratory investigation of databases based on REL ENGLISH [1]. In our system, data structures and access language were designed to map closely the corporate structure and its terminology. Our test vehicle was a portion of Hewlett-Packard's internal information network, the corporate Order Processing System. We have identified about a dozen job related perspectives belonging to geographically dispersed and functionally stratified end-users within various entities of the HP organization. A multinested data model is an intertwined hierarchy: the join of separate hierarchies with different lexicons but shared data events. For our test, we have selected two major intersecting multinested user views: sales and manufacturing. Our design accommodates users with differing perspectives of this model.The system data structures were constructed using the REL ENGLISH primitives. The Condensed Order Records (COR) base spanned a multinested hierarchy four levels deep for the Sales Organization taxonomy and five levels deep for the Manufactured Products taxomony. The design permits the user to query the COR base about the data model itself. He can, of course, also obtain the standard statistical views of the data.Corporate taxonomies are dynamically changing structures. The database model needs to reflect this change. In most cases, the user wants to manipulate data at three levels in his own job taxonomy and at all levels in the other taxonomies. The multinested data model is needed in order to permit the user to view the data from the same perspective that he views his job in the corporate organization.
Egon E. Loebner, Steve Gadol
CHI (2)1