Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fangyu Wu 0003
dblp:200/7639-3
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7633-5910ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 29% Autonomous driving · 27% Image recognition and object detection · 14% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › collision avoidance › multi-robot collision avoidance
decentralized collision avoidance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decentralized Vehicle Coordination: The Berkeley DeepDrive Drone Dataset and Consensus-Based Models · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decentralized Vehicle Coordination: The Berkeley DeepDrive Drone Dataset and Consensus-Based Models · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decentralized Vehicle Coordination: The Berkeley DeepDrive Drone Dataset and Consensus-Based Models · ICRA 2025 |
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › state estimation
trajectory estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decentralized Vehicle Coordination: The Berkeley DeepDrive Drone Dataset and Consensus-Based Models · ICRA 2025 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection › category-specific object detection
vehicle detection |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Decentralized Vehicle Coordination: The Berkeley DeepDrive Drone Dataset and Consensus-Based Models · ICRA 2025 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | From Sim to Real: A Pipeline for Training and Deploying Traffic Smoothing Cruise Controllers · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › policy optimization
policy gradient |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | From Sim to Real: A Pipeline for Training and Deploying Traffic Smoothing Cruise Controllers · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
differential topology · 0.9consensus-based modeling · 0.9reinforcement learning · 0.8policy gradient · 0.8asymmetric critic · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Decentralized Vehicle Coordination: The Berkeley DeepDrive Drone Dataset and Consensus-Based ModelsabstractA significant portion of roads, particularly in densely populated developing countries, lacks explicitly defined right-of-way rules. These understructured roads pose substantial challenges for autonomous vehicle motion planning, where efficient and safe navigation relies on understanding decentralized human coordination for collision avoidance. This coordination, often termed “social driving etiquette,” remains underexplored due to limited open-source empirical data and suitable modeling frameworks. In this paper, we present a novel dataset and modeling framework designed to study motion planning in these understructured environments. The dataset includes 20 aerial videos of representative scenarios, an image dataset for training vehicle detection models, and a development kit for vehicle trajectory estimation. We demonstrate that a consensus-based modeling approach can effectively explain the emergence of priority orders observed in our dataset, and is therefore a viable framework for decentralized collision avoidance planning. Fangyu Wu 0003, Dequan Wang, Minjune Hwang, Chenhui Hao, Jiamu Zhang, Christopher Chou, Trevor Darrell, Alexandre M. Bayen |
ICRA | 1 |
| 2024 | Composing MPC With LQR and Neural Network for Amortized Efficiency and Stable ControlabstractModel predictive control (MPC) is a powerful control method that handles dynamical systems with constraints. However, solving MPC iteratively in real time, i.e., implicit MPC, remains a computational challenge. To address this, common solutions include explicit MPC and function approximation. Both methods, whenever applicable, may improve the computational efficiency of the implicit MPC by several orders of magnitude. Nevertheless, explicit MPC often requires expensive pre-computation and does not easily apply to higher-dimensional problems. Meanwhile, function approximation, although scales better with dimension, still requires pre-training on a large dataset and generally cannot guarantee to find an accurate surrogate policy, the failure of which often leads to closed-loop instability. To address these issues, we propose a triple-mode hybrid control scheme, named Memory-Augmented MPC, by combining a linear quadratic regulator, a neural network, and an MPC. From its standard form, we derive two variants of such hybrid control scheme: one customized for chaotic systems and the other for slow systems. The proposed scheme does not require pre-computation and is capable of improving the amortized running time of the composed MPC with a well-trained neural network. In addition, the scheme maintains closed-loop stability with any neural networks of proper input and output dimensions, alleviating the need for certifying optimality of the neural network in safety-critical applications. Note to Practitioners—This article was motivated by the need to reduce the amortized cost of MPC in repetitive industrial robotic applications, where long-term operational cost is important and safety is critical. Examples of such applications include factory robotic arm manipulation and fixed-route quadcopter payload transport. Unlike explicit MPC or function approximation, our approach does not require any pre-computation or pre-training. Rather, it attains task proficiency over time by learning a surrogate neural network on the spot and by gradually replacing the costly MPC with the more efficient surrogate model so long as safety permits. Consequently, the proposed scheme incurs a learning cost during the initial phase of the deployment but usually becomes more adept on the task afterwards, leading to amortized efficiency. Fangyu Wu 0003, Siyuan Zhuang, Alexander Keimer, Ion Stoica, Alexandre M. Bayen |
IEEE Trans Autom. Sci. Eng. | 1 |
| 2024 | From Sim to Real: A Pipeline for Training and Deploying Traffic Smoothing Cruise ControllersabstractDesigning and validating controllers for connected and automated vehicles to enhance traffic flow presents significant challenges, from the complexity of replicating real-world stop-and-go traffic dynamics in simulation, to the intricacies involved in transitioning from simulation to actual deployment. In this work, we present a full pipeline from data collection to controller deployment. Specifically, we collect 772 km of driving data from the I-24 in Tennessee, and use it to build a one-lane simulator, placing simulated vehicles behind real-world trajectories. Using policy-gradient methods with an asymmetric critic, we improve fuel efficiency by over 10% when simulating congested scenarios. Our comprehensive approach includes reinforcement learning for controller training, software verification, hardware validation and setup, and navigating various sim-to-real challenges. Furthermore, we analyze the controller's behavior and wave-smoothing properties, and deploy it on four Toyota Rav4’s in a real-world validation experiment on the I-24. Finally, we release the driving dataset (Nice et al., 2021), the simulator and the trained controller (Lichtlé et al., 2022), to enable future benchmarking and controller design. Nathan Lichtle, Eugene Vinitsky, Matthew Nice, Rahul Bhadani, Matt Bunting, Fangyu Wu 0003, Benedetto Piccoli, Benjamin Seibold, Daniel B. Work, Jonathan W. Lee, Jonathan Sprinkle, Alexandre M. Bayen |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 6 |