Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Heewoo Jun
dblp:200/8045
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 48% Deep learning architectures and training · 36% Representation and self-supervised learning · 16% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.9 | 2 | 2020 | Distribution Augmentation for Generative Modeling · ICML 2020 Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
autoregressive image modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training
generative pretraining |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › sequence modeling
transformer-based sequence modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Generative Pretraining From Pixels · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
data augmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Distribution Augmentation for Generative Modeling · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
linear probing · 0.4fine-tuning · 0.4data augmentation · 0.4autoregressive modeling · 0.4VQVAE encoding · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Generative Pretraining From PixelsabstractInspired by progress in unsupervised representation learning for natural language, we examine whether similar models can learn useful representations for images. We train a sequence Transformer to auto-regressively predict pixels, without incorporating knowledge of the 2D input structure. Despite training on low-resolution ImageNet without labels, we find that a GPT-2 scale model learns strong image representations as measured by linear probing, fine-tuning, and low-data classification. On CIFAR-10, we achieve 96.3% accuracy with a linear probe, outperforming a supervised Wide ResNet, and 99.0% accuracy with full fine-tuning, matching the top supervised pre-trained models. We are also competitive with self-supervised benchmarks on ImageNet when substituting pixels for a VQVAE encoding, achieving 69.0% top-1 accuracy on a linear probe of our features. Mark Chen 0003, Alec Radford, Rewon Child, Jeff Wu 0003, Heewoo Jun, David Luan, Ilya Sutskever |
ICML | 5 |
| 2020 | Distribution Augmentation for Generative ModelingabstractWe present distribution augmentation (DistAug), a simple and powerful method of regularizing generative models. Our approach applies augmentation functions to data and, importantly, conditions the generative model on the specific function used. Unlike typical data augmentation, DistAug allows usage of functions which modify the target density, enabling aggressive augmentations more commonly seen in supervised and self-supervised learning. We demonstrate this is a more effective regularizer than standard methods, and use it to train a 152M parameter autoregressive model on CIFAR-10 to 2.56 bits per dim (relative to the state-of-the-art 2.80). Samples from this model attain FID 12.75 and IS 8.40, outperforming the majority of GANs. We further demonstrate the technique is broadly applicable across model architectures and problem domains. Heewoo Jun, Rewon Child, Mark Chen 0003, John Schulman, Aditya Ramesh, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Language Modeling at ScaleabstractWe show how Zipf's Law can be used to scale up language modeling (LM) to take advantage of more training data and more GPUs. LM plays a key role in many important natural language applications such as speech recognition and machine translation. Scaling up LM is important since it is widely accepted by the community that there is no data like more data. Eventually, we would like to train on terabytes (TBs) of text (trillions of words). Modern training methods are far from this goal, because of various bottlenecks, especially memory (within GPUs) and communication (across GPUs). This paper shows how Zipf's Law can address these bottlenecks by grouping parameters for common words and character sequences, because U ≪ N, where U is the number of unique words (types) and N is the size of the training set (tokens). For a local batch size K with G GPUs and a D-dimension embedding matrix, we reduce the original per-GPU memory and communication asymptotic complexity from Θ(GKD) to Θ(GK + UD). Empirically, we find U ∝ (GK)^0.64 on four publicly available large datasets. When we scale up the number of GPUs to 64, a factor of 8, training time speeds up by factors up to 6.7× (for character LMs) and 6.3× (for word LMs) with negligible loss of accuracy. Our weak scaling on 192 GPUs on the Tieba dataset shows a 35% improvement in LM prediction accuracy by training on 93 GB of data (2.5× larger than publicly available SOTA dataset), but taking only 1.25× increase in training time, compared to 3 GB of the same dataset running on 6 GPUs. Md. Mostofa Ali Patwary, Milind Chabbi, Heewoo Jun, Jiaji Huang, Gregory Frederick Diamos, Kenneth Church 0001 |
IPDPS | 3 |
| 2019 | Fast Spectrogram Inversion Using Multi-Head Convolutional Neural NetworksabstractWe propose the multi-head convolutional neural network (MCNN) for waveform synthesis from spectrograms. Nonlinear interpolation in MCNN is employed with transposed convolution layers in parallel heads. MCNN enables significantly better utilization of modern multi-core processors than commonly used iterative algorithms like Griffin-Lim, and yields very fast (more than 300 × real time) runtime. For training of MCNN, we use a large-scale speech recognition dataset and losses defined on waveforms that are related to perceptual audio quality. We demonstrate that MCNN constitutes a very promising approach for high-quality speech synthesis, without any iterative algorithms or autoregression in computations. Sercan Ö. Arik, Heewoo Jun, Gregory Frederick Diamos |
IEEE Signal Process. Lett. | 2 |
| 2018 | Robust Speech Recognition Using Generative Adversarial NetworksabstractThis paper describes a general, scalable, end-to-end framework that uses the generative adversarial network (GAN) objective to enable robust speech recognition. Encoders trained with the proposed approach enjoy improved invariance by learning to map noisy audio to the same embedding space as that of clean audio. Unlike previous methods, the new framework does not rely on domain expertise or strong assumptions, and directly encourages robustness in a data-driven way. We show the new approach improves simulated far-field speech recognition of vanilla sequence-to-sequence models without specialized front-ends or preprocessing. Anuroop Sriram, Heewoo Jun, Yashesh Gaur, Sanjeev Satheesh |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2018 | Cold Fusion: Training Seq2Seq Models Together with Language ModelsabstractSequence-to-sequence (Seq2Seq) models with attention have excelled at tasks which involve generating natural language sentences such as machine translation, image captioning and speech recognition. Performance has further been improved by leveraging unlabeled data, often in the form of a language model. In this work, we present the Cold Fusion method, which leverages a pre-trained language model during training, and show its effectiveness on the speech recognition task. We show that Seq2Seq models with Cold Fusion are able to better utilize language information enjoying i) faster convergence and better generalization, and ii) almost complete transfer to a new domain while using less than 10% of the labeled training data. Anuroop Sriram, Heewoo Jun, Sanjeev Satheesh, Adam Coates 0002 |
INTERSPEECH | 2 |