Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Raghu Bollapragada
dblp:200/8600
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization › quasi-newton method
limited-memory BFGS |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Progressive Batching L-BFGS Method for Machine Learning · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › second-order optimization
quasi-newton method |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Progressive Batching L-BFGS Method for Machine Learning · ICML 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Progressive Batching L-BFGS Method for Machine Learning · ICML 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic line search · 0.3quasi-newton updating · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Learning a neural Pareto manifold extractor with constraintsabstractMulti-objective optimization (MOO) problems require balancing competing objectives, often under constraints. The Pareto optimal solution set defines all possible optimal trade-offs over such objectives. In this work, we present a novel method for Pareto-front learning: inducing the full Pareto manifold at train-time so users can pick any desired optimal trade-off point at run-time. Our key insight is to exploit Fritz-John Conditions for a novel guided double gradient descent strategy. Evaluation on synthetic benchmark problems allows us to vary MOO problem difficulty in controlled fashion and measure accuracy \vs known analytic solutions. We further test scalability and generalization in learning optimal neural model parameterizations for Multi-Task Learning (MTL) on image classification. Results show consistent improvement in accuracy and efficiency over prior MTL methods as well as techniques from operations research. Soumyajit Gupta, Raghu Bollapragada, Matthew Lease |
UAI | 3 |
| 2019 | Nonlinear Acceleration of Primal-Dual AlgorithmsabstractWe describe a convergence acceleration scheme for multi-step optimization algorithms. The extrapolated solution is written as a nonlinear average of the iterates produced by the original optimization algorithm. Our scheme does not need the underlying fixed-point operator to be symmetric, hence handles e.g. algorithms with momentum terms such as Nesterov’s accelerated method, or primal-dual methods such as Chambolle-Pock. The weights are computed via a simple linear system and we analyze performance in both online and offline modes. We use Crouzeix’s conjecture to show that acceleration is controlled by the solution of a Chebyshev problem on the numerical range of a nonsymmetric operator modelling the behavior of iterates near the optimum. Numerical experiments are detailed on image processing and logistic regression problems. Raghu Bollapragada, Damien Scieur, Alexandre d'Aspremont |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2018 | A Progressive Batching L-BFGS Method for Machine LearningabstractThe standard L-BFGS method relies on gradient approximations that are not dominated by noise, so that search directions are descent directions, the line search is reliable, and quasi-Newton updating yields useful quadratic models of the objective function. All of this appears to call for a full batch approach, but since small batch sizes give rise to faster algorithms with better generalization properties, L-BFGS is currently not considered an algorithm of choice for large-scale machine learning applications. One need not, however, choose between the two extremes represented by the full batch or highly stochastic regimes, and may instead follow a progressive batching approach in which the sample size increases during the course of the optimization. In this paper, we present a new version of the L-BFGS algorithm that combines three basic components - progressive batching, a stochastic line search, and stable quasi-Newton updating - and that performs well on training logistic regression and deep neural networks. We provide supporting convergence theory for the method. Raghu Bollapragada, Dheevatsa Mudigere, Jorge Nocedal, Hao-Jun Michael Shi, Ping Tak Peter Tang |
ICML | 1 |