Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aniruddh Raghu
dblp:200/8793
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 40% Optimization for machine learning · 20% Representation and self-supervised learning · 14% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 75% Medical and health informatics · 25% | |
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Wireless sensing and localization · 100% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Meta-learning to Improve Pre-training · NeurIPS 2021 Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAML · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Optimization of Antibodies Informed by a Generative Model of Evolving Sequences · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein design
antibody design |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Optimization of Antibodies Informed by a Generative Model of Evolving Sequences · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
multimodal self-supervised learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Multi-Dimensional Self-Supervised Learning for Clinical Time Series · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning
gradient-based meta-learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Meta-learning to Improve Pre-training · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Meta-learning to Improve Pre-training · NeurIPS 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Teaching with Commentaries · ICLR 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › pre-training and adaptation
pre-training and fine-tuning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Meta-learning to Improve Pre-training · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
feature reuse |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAML · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › meta-learning › gradient-based meta-learning
model-agnostic meta-learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAML · ICLR 2020 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
human mesh recovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Through-Wall Human Mesh Recovery Using Radio Signals · ICCV 2019 |
Wireless sensing and localization
RF sensing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Through-Wall Human Mesh Recovery Using Radio Signals · ICCV 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Representation Balancing MDPs for Off-policy Policy Evaluation · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Representation Balancing MDPs for Off-policy Policy Evaluation · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
representation balancing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Representation Balancing MDPs for Off-policy Policy Evaluation · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative model
generative sequence model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Optimization of Antibodies Informed by a Generative Model of Evolving Sequences · ICLR 2025 |
Medical and health informatics
clinical time series |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Sequential Multi-Dimensional Self-Supervised Learning for Clinical Time Series · ICML 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
twisted sequential monte carlo · 1.7sequential monte carlo · 1.7large language model · 1.7contrastive learning · 1.3VICReg · 1.3language model · 0.5implicit differentiation · 0.5commentary · 0.5backpropagation through unrolled optimization · 0.5gradient descent · 0.4weak supervision · 0.4multi-headed self-attention · 0.4adversarial temporal discriminator · 0.4generalization error bound · 0.3MDP model · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bayesian Optimization of Antibodies Informed by a Generative Model of Evolving SequencesabstractTo build effective therapeutics, biologists iteratively mutate antibody sequences to improve binding and stability. Proposed mutations can be informed by previous measurements or by learning from large antibody databases to predict only typical antibodies. Unfortunately, the space of typical antibodies is enormous to search, and experiments often fail to find suitable antibodies on a budget. We introduce Clone-informed Bayesian Optimization (CloneBO), a Bayesian optimization procedure that efficiently optimizes antibodies in the lab by teaching a generative model how our immune system optimizes antibodies. Our immune system makes antibodies by iteratively evolving specific portions of their sequences to bind their target strongly and stably, resulting in a set of related, evolving sequences known as a *clonal family*. We train a large language model, CloneLM, on hundreds of thousands of clonal families and use it to design sequences with mutations that are most likely to optimize an antibody within the human immune system. We propose to guide our designs to fit previous measurements with a twisted sequential Monte Carlo procedure. We show that CloneBO optimizes antibodies substantially more efficiently than previous methods in realistic *in silico* experiments and designs stronger and more stable binders in *in vitro* wet lab experiments. Alan Nawzad Amin, Nate Gruver, Yilun Kuang, Yucen Lily Li, Hunter Elliott, Calvin McCarter, Aniruddh Raghu, Peyton Greenside, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
ICLR | 7 |
| 2023 | Sequential Multi-Dimensional Self-Supervised Learning for Clinical Time SeriesabstractSelf-supervised learning (SSL) for clinical time series data has received significant attention in recent literature, since these data are highly rich and provide important information about a patient's physiological state. However, most existing SSL methods for clinical time series are limited in that they are designed for unimodal time series, such as a sequence of structured features (e.g., lab values and vitals signs) or an individual high-dimensional physiological signal (e.g., an electrocardiogram). These existing methods cannot be readily extended to model time series that exhibit multimodality, with structured features and high-dimensional data being recorded at each timestep in the sequence. In this work, we address this gap and propose a new SSL method --- Sequential Multi-Dimensional SSL --- where a SSL loss is applied both at the level of the entire sequence and at the level of the individual high-dimensional data points in the sequence in order to better capture information at both scales. Our strategy is agnostic to the specific form of loss function used at each level -- it can be contrastive, as in SimCLR, or non-contrastive, as in VICReg. We evaluate our method on two real-world clinical datasets, where the time series contains sequences of (1) high-frequency electrocardiograms and (2) structured data from lab values and vitals signs. Our experimental results indicate that pre-training with our method and then fine-tuning on downstream tasks improves performance over baselines on both datasets, and in several settings, can lead to improvements across different self-supervised loss functions. Aniruddh Raghu, Payal Chandak, Ridwan Alam, John V. Guttag, Collin M. Stultz |
ICML | 1 |
| 2021 | Teaching with Commentaries
Aniruddh Raghu, Maithra Raghu, Simon Kornblith, David Duvenaud, Geoffrey E. Hinton |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Meta-learning to Improve Pre-trainingabstractPre-training (PT) followed by fine-tuning (FT) is an effective method for training neural networks, and has led to significant performance improvements in many domains. PT can incorporate various design choices such as task and data reweighting strategies, augmentation policies, and noise models, all of which can significantly impact the quality of representations learned. The hyperparameters introduced by these strategies therefore must be tuned appropriately. However, setting the values of these hyperparameters is challenging. Most existing methods either struggle to scale to high dimensions, are too slow and memory-intensive, or cannot be directly applied to the two-stage PT and FT learning process. In this work, we propose an efficient, gradient-based algorithm to meta-learn PT hyperparameters. We formalize the PT hyperparameter optimization problem and propose a novel method to obtain PT hyperparameter gradients by combining implicit differentiation and backpropagation through unrolled optimization. We demonstrate that our method improves predictive performance on two real-world domains. First, we optimize high-dimensional task weighting hyperparameters for multitask pre-training on protein-protein interaction graphs and improve AUROC by up to 3.9%. Second, we optimize a data augmentation neural network for self-supervised PT with SimCLR on electrocardiography data and improve AUROC by up to 1.9%. Aniruddh Raghu, Jonathan Lorraine, Simon Kornblith, Matthew McDermott, David Duvenaud |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAML
Aniruddh Raghu, Maithra Raghu, Samy Bengio, Oriol Vinyals |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | Through-Wall Human Mesh Recovery Using Radio SignalsabstractThis paper presents RF-Avatar, a neural network model that can estimate 3D meshes of the human body in the presence of occlusions, baggy clothes, and bad lighting conditions. We leverage that radio frequency (RF) signals in the WiFi range traverse clothes and occlusions and bounce off the human body. Our model parses such radio signals and recovers 3D body meshes. Our meshes are dynamic and smoothly track the movements of the corresponding people. Further, our model works both in single and multi-person scenarios. Inferring body meshes from radio signals is a highly under-constrained problem. Our model deals with this challenge using: 1) a combination of strong and weak supervision, 2) a multi-headed self-attention mechanism that attends differently to temporal information in the radio signal, and 3) an adversarially trained temporal discriminator that imposes a prior on the dynamics of human motion. Our results show that RF-Avatar accurately recovers dynamic 3D meshes in the presence of occlusions, baggy clothes, bad lighting conditions, and even through walls. Mingmin Zhao, Yingcheng Liu, Aniruddh Raghu, Hang Zhao 0021, Tianhong Li, Antonio Torralba 0001, Dina Katabi |
ICCV | 3 |
| 2018 | Representation Balancing MDPs for Off-policy Policy EvaluationabstractWe study the problem of off-policy policy evaluation (OPPE) in RL. In contrast to prior work, we consider how to estimate both the individual policy value and average policy value accurately. We draw inspiration from recent work in causal reasoning, and propose a new finite sample generalization error bound for value estimates from MDP models. Using this upper bound as an objective, we develop a learning algorithm of an MDP model with a balanced representation, and show that our approach can yield substantially lower MSE in common synthetic benchmarks and a HIV treatment simulation domain. Yao Liu 0009, Omer Gottesman, Aniruddh Raghu, Matthieu Komorowski, A. Aldo Faisal, Finale Doshi-Velez, Emma Brunskill |
NeurIPS | 3 |