Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Christian Etmann

dblp:200/8836 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 85% Image recognition and object detection · 7% Deep learning architectures and training · 7%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.412019
On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretability · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.412019
On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretability · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map
0.412019
On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretability · ICML 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification
0.312018
Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
mass spectrometry imaging
0.312018
Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
convolutional neural network classification
0.112018
Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification
0.112018
Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sensitivity analysis · 0.7cross-validation · 0.7lipschitz regularization · 0.4deep convolutional networks · 0.3deep convolutional network · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretability
abstract
Recent studies on the adversarial vulnerability of neural networks have shown that models trained to be more robust to adversarial attacks exhibit more interpretable saliency maps than their non-robust counterparts. We aim to quantify this behaviour by considering the alignment between input image and saliency map. We hypothesize that as the distance to the decision boundary grows, so does the alignment. This connection is strictly true in the case of linear models. We confirm these theoretical findings with experiments based on models trained with a local Lipschitz regularization and identify where the nonlinear nature of neural networks weakens the relation.
Christian Etmann, Sebastian Lunz, Peter Maass, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb
ICML1
2018 Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry
abstract
Motivation: Tumor classification using imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) data has a high potential for future applications in pathology. Due to the complexity and size of the data, automated feature extraction and classification steps are required to fully process the data. Since mass spectra exhibit certain structural similarities to image data, deep learning may offer a promising strategy for classification of IMS data as it has been successfully applied to image classification. Results: Methodologically, we propose an adapted architecture based on deep convolutional networks to handle the characteristics of mass spectrometry data, as well as a strategy to interpret the learned model in the spectral domain based on a sensitivity analysis. The proposed methods are evaluated on two algorithmically challenging tumor classification tasks and compared to a baseline approach. Competitiveness of the proposed methods is shown on both tasks by studying the performance via cross-validation. Moreover, the learned models are analyzed by the proposed sensitivity analysis revealing biologically plausible effects as well as confounding factors of the considered tasks. Thus, this study may serve as a starting point for further development of deep learning approaches in IMS classification tasks. Availability and implementation: https://gitlab.informatik.uni-bremen.de/digipath/Deep_Learning_for_Tumor_Classification_in_IMS. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Jens Behrmann, Christian Etmann, Tobias Boskamp, Rita Casadonte, Jörg Kriegsmann, Peter Maass
Bioinform.2