Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Etmann
dblp:200/8836
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 85% Image recognition and object detection · 7% Deep learning architectures and training · 7% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretability · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretability · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretability · ICML 2019 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
cancer classification |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
mass spectrometry imaging |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › convolutional neural network
convolutional neural network classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometry · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sensitivity analysis · 0.7cross-validation · 0.7lipschitz regularization · 0.4deep convolutional networks · 0.3deep convolutional network · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map InterpretabilityabstractRecent studies on the adversarial vulnerability of neural networks have shown that models trained to be more robust to adversarial attacks exhibit more interpretable saliency maps than their non-robust counterparts. We aim to quantify this behaviour by considering the alignment between input image and saliency map. We hypothesize that as the distance to the decision boundary grows, so does the alignment. This connection is strictly true in the case of linear models. We confirm these theoretical findings with experiments based on models trained with a local Lipschitz regularization and identify where the nonlinear nature of neural networks weakens the relation. Christian Etmann, Sebastian Lunz, Peter Maass, Carola-Bibiane Schönlieb |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Deep learning for tumor classification in imaging mass spectrometryabstractMotivation: Tumor classification using imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) data has a high potential for future applications in pathology. Due to the complexity and size of the data, automated feature extraction and classification steps are required to fully process the data. Since mass spectra exhibit certain structural similarities to image data, deep learning may offer a promising strategy for classification of IMS data as it has been successfully applied to image classification. Results: Methodologically, we propose an adapted architecture based on deep convolutional networks to handle the characteristics of mass spectrometry data, as well as a strategy to interpret the learned model in the spectral domain based on a sensitivity analysis. The proposed methods are evaluated on two algorithmically challenging tumor classification tasks and compared to a baseline approach. Competitiveness of the proposed methods is shown on both tasks by studying the performance via cross-validation. Moreover, the learned models are analyzed by the proposed sensitivity analysis revealing biologically plausible effects as well as confounding factors of the considered tasks. Thus, this study may serve as a starting point for further development of deep learning approaches in IMS classification tasks. Availability and implementation: https://gitlab.informatik.uni-bremen.de/digipath/Deep_Learning_for_Tumor_Classification_in_IMS. Contact: [email protected] or [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Jens Behrmann, Christian Etmann, Tobias Boskamp, Rita Casadonte, Jörg Kriegsmann, Peter Maass |
Bioinform. | 2 |