Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yonatan Geifman
dblp:200/9012
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 42% Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Deep learning architectures and training · 8% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
1.7 | 2 | 2025 | FFN Fusion: Rethinking Sequential Computation in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
selective classification |
1.3 | 3 | 2023 | Window-Based Distribution Shift Detection for Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Option · ICML 2019 Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
neural architecture search |
1.2 | 2 | 2025 | Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025 Deep Active Learning with a Neural Architecture Search · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FFN Fusion: Rethinking Sequential Computation in Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › distribution shift
distribution shift detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Window-Based Distribution Shift Detection for Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization bounds |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Window-Based Distribution Shift Detection for Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Window-Based Distribution Shift Detection for Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deep Active Learning with a Neural Architecture Search · NeurIPS 2019 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › image classification
deep classifier |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bias-Reduced Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Neural Classifiers · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and abstention |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject Option · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bias-Reduced Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Neural Classifiers · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty and reliability |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networks · NIPS 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMs · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parallelization · 0.9mixed integer programming · 0.9feed-forward network fusion · 0.9blockwise local knowledge distillation · 0.9selective prediction · 0.7coverage generalization bound · 0.7rejection learning · 0.4end-to-end training · 0.4coreset · 0.4bias reduction · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Puzzle: Distillation-Based NAS for Inference-Optimized LLMsabstractLarge language models (LLMs) offer remarkable capabilities, yet their high inference costs restrict wider adoption.
While increasing parameter counts improves accuracy, it also broadens the gap between state-of-the-art capabilities and practical deployability. We present **Puzzle**, a hardware-aware framework that accelerates the inference of LLMs while preserving their capabilities.
Using neural architecture search (NAS) at a large-scale, Puzzle optimizes models with tens of billions of parameters.
Our approach utilizes blockwise local knowledge distillation (BLD) for parallel architecture exploration and employs mixed-integer programming for precise constraint optimization.
We showcase our framework’s impact via Llama-3.1-Nemotron-51B-Instruct (Nemotron-51B) and Llama-3.3-Nemotron-49B, two publicly available models derived from Llama-70B-Instruct. Both models achieve a 2.17x inference throughput speedup, fitting on a single NVIDIA H100 GPU while retaining 98.4% of the original model's benchmark accuracies.
These are the most accurate models supporting single H100 GPU inference with large batch sizes, despite training on 45B tokens at most, far fewer than the 15T used to train Llama-70B.
Lastly, we show that lightweight alignment on these derived models allows them to surpass the parent model in specific capabilities.
Our work establishes that powerful LLM models can be optimized for efficient deployment with only negligible loss in quality, underscoring that inference performance, not parameter count alone, should guide model selection. Akhiad Bercovich, Tomer Ronen, Talor Abramovich, Nir Ailon, Nave Assaf, Mohammad Dabbah, Ido Galil, Amnon Geifman, Yonatan Geifman, Izhak Golan, Netanel Haber, Ehud Karpas, Roi Koren, Itay Levy, Pavlo Molchanov 0001, Shahar Mor, Zach Moshe, Najeeb Nabwani, Omri Puny, Ran Rubin, Itamar Schen, Ido Shahaf, Oren Tropp, Omer Ullman Argov, Ran Zilberstein, Ran El-Yaniv |
ICML | 9 |
| 2025 | FFN Fusion: Rethinking Sequential Computation in Large Language ModelsabstractWe introduce \textit{FFN Fusion}, an architectural optimization technique that reduces sequential computation in large language models by identifying and exploiting natural opportunities for parallelization. Our key insight is that sequences of Feed-Forward Network (FFN) layers, particularly those remaining after the removal of specific attention layers, can often be parallelized with minimal accuracy impact. We develop a principled methodology for identifying and fusing such sequences, transforming them into parallel operations that significantly reduce inference latency while preserving model behavior. Applying these techniques to Llama-3.1-405B-Instruct, we create a 253B model (253B-Base), an efficient and soon-to-be publicly available model that achieves a 1.71$\times$ speedup in inference latency and 35$\times$ lower per-token cost while maintaining strong performance across benchmarks. Most intriguingly, we find that even full transformer blocks containing both attention and FFN layers can sometimes be parallelized, suggesting new directions for neural architecture design. Akhiad Bercovich, Mohammad Dabbah, Omri Puny, Ido Galil, Amnon Geifman, Yonatan Geifman, Izik Golan, Ehud Karpas, Itay Levy, Zach Moshe, Najeeb Nabwani, Tomer Ronen, Itamar Schen, Ido Shahaf, Oren Tropp, Ran Zilberstein, Ran El-Yaniv |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2023 | Window-Based Distribution Shift Detection for Deep Neural NetworksabstractTo deploy and operate deep neural models in production, the quality of their predictions, which might be contaminated benignly or manipulated maliciously by input distributional deviations, must be monitored and assessed. Specifically, we study the case of monitoring the healthy operation of a deep neural network (DNN) receiving a stream of data, with the aim of detecting input distributional deviations over which the quality of the network's predictions is potentially damaged. Using selective prediction principles, we propose a distribution deviation detection method for DNNs. The proposed method is derived from a tight coverage generalization bound computed over a sample of instances drawn from the true underlying distribution. Based on this bound, our detector continuously monitors the operation of the network over a test window and fires off an alarm whenever a deviation is detected. Our novel detection method performs on-par or better than the state-of-the-art, while consuming substantially lower computation time (five orders of magnitude reduction) and space complexity. Unlike previous methods, which require at least linear dependence on the size of the source distribution for each detection, rendering them inapplicable to ``Google-Scale'' datasets, our approach eliminates this dependence, making it suitable for real-world applications. Code is available at [https://github.com/BarSGuy/Window-Based-Distribution-Shift-Detection](https://github.com/BarSGuy/Window-Based-Distribution-Shift-Detection). Guy Bar-Shalom, Yonatan Geifman, Ran El-Yaniv |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2019 | Bias-Reduced Uncertainty Estimation for Deep Neural Classifiers
Yonatan Geifman, Guy Uziel, Ran El-Yaniv |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2019 | SelectiveNet: A Deep Neural Network with an Integrated Reject OptionabstractWe consider the problem of selective prediction (also known as reject option) in deep neural networks, and introduce SelectiveNet, a deep neural architecture with an integrated reject option. Existing rejection mechanisms are based mostly on a threshold over the prediction confidence of a pre-trained network. In contrast, SelectiveNet is trained to optimize both classification (or regression) and rejection simultaneously, end-to-end. The result is a deep neural network that is optimized over the covered domain. In our experiments, we show a consistently improved risk-coverage trade-off over several well-known classification and regression datasets, thus reaching new state-of-the-art results for deep selective classification. Yonatan Geifman, Ran El-Yaniv |
ICML | 1 |
| 2019 | Deep Active Learning with a Neural Architecture SearchabstractWe consider active learning of deep neural networks. Most active learning works in this context have focused on studying effective querying mechanisms and assumed that an appropriate network architecture is a priori known for the problem at hand. We challenge this assumption and propose a novel active strategy whereby the learning algorithm searches for effective architectures on the fly, while actively learning. We apply our strategy using three known querying techniques (softmax response, MC-dropout, and coresets) and show that the proposed approach overwhelmingly outperforms active learning using fixed architectures. Yonatan Geifman, Ran El-Yaniv |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Selective Classification for Deep Neural NetworksabstractSelective classification techniques (also known as reject option) have not yet been considered in the context of deep neural networks (DNNs). These techniques can potentially significantly improve DNNs prediction performance by trading-off coverage. In this paper we propose a method to construct a selective classifier given a trained neural network. Our method allows a user to set a desired risk level. At test time, the classifier rejects instances as needed, to grant the desired risk (with high probability). Empirical results over CIFAR and ImageNet convincingly demonstrate the viability of our method, which opens up possibilities to operate DNNs in mission-critical applications. For example, using our method an unprecedented 2% error in top-5 ImageNet classification can be guaranteed with probability 99.9%, with almost 60% test coverage. Yonatan Geifman, Ran El-Yaniv |
NIPS | 1 |