Artículos en revistas

Bayesian optimization (BO) methods based on information theory have obtained state-of-the-art results in several tasks. These techniques rely on the Kullback–Leibler (KL) divergence to compute the acquisition function. We introduce a novel information-based class of acquisition functions for BO called Alpha Entropy Search (AES). AES is based on the alpha-divergence, which generalizes the KL-divergence. Iteratively, AES selects the next evaluation point as the one whose associated target value has the highest level of dependency with respect to the location and associated value of the global maximum of the optimization problem. Dependency is measured in terms of the alpha-divergence, as an alternative to the KL-divergence. Intuitively, this favors evaluating the objective function at the most informative points about the global maximum. The alpha-divergence has a free parameter α , which determines the behavior of the divergence, balancing local and global differences. Therefore, different values of α result in different acquisition functions. AES acquisition lacks a closed-form expression. However, we propose an efficient and accurate approximation using a truncated Gaussian distribution. In practice, the value of α can be chosen by the practitioner, but here we suggest using a combination of acquisition functions obtained by simultaneously considering a range of α values. We provide an implementation of AES in BOTorch and we evaluate its performance in synthetic, benchmark, and real-world experiments involving the tuning of the hyper-parameters of a deep neural network. These experiments show that AES performance is competitive with other information-based acquisition functions such as JES, MES, or PES.

This article explores the ethical problems arising from the use of ChatGPT as a kind of generative AI and suggests responses based on the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) framework. The HCAI framework is appropriate because it understands technology above all as a tool to empower, augment, and enhance human agency while referring to human wellbeing as a “grand challenge,” thus perfectly aligning itself with ethics, the science of human flourishing. Further, HCAI provides objectives, principles, procedures, and structures for reliable, safe, and trustworthy AI which we apply to our ChatGPT assessments. The main danger ChatGPT presents is the propensity to be used as a “weapon of mass deception” (WMD) and an enabler of criminal activities involving deceit. We review technical specifications to better comprehend its potentials and limitations. We then suggest both technical (watermarking, styleme, detectors, and fact-checkers) and non-technical measures (terms of use, transparency, educator considerations, HITL) to mitigate ChatGPT misuse or abuse and recommend best uses (creative writing, non-creative writing, teaching and learning). We conclude with considerations regarding the role of hu mans in ensuring the proper use of ChatGPT for individual and social wellbeing.

We present MESMOC+, an improved version of Max-value Entropy search for Multi-Objective Bayesian optimization with Constraints (MESMOC). MESMOC+ can be used to solve constrained multi-objective problems when the objectives and the constraints are expensive to evaluate. It is based on minimizing the entropy of the solution of the optimization problem in function space (i.e., the Pareto front) to guide the search for the optimum. The cost of MESMOC+ is linear in the number of objectives and constraints. Furthermore, it is often significantly smaller than the cost of alternative methods based on minimizing the entropy of the Pareto set. The reason for this is that it is easier to approximate the required computations in MESMOC+. Moreover, MESMOC+’s acquisition function is expressed as the sum of one acquisition per each black-box (objective or constraint). Therefore, it can be used in a decoupled evaluation setting in which it is chosen not only the next input location to evaluate, but also which black-box to evaluate there. We compare MESMOC+ with related methods in synthetic, benchmark and real optimization problems. These experiments show that MESMOC+ has similar performance to that of state-of-the-art acquisitions based on entropy search, but it is faster to execute and simpler to implement. Moreover, our experiments also show that MESMOC+ is more robust with respect to the number of samples of the Pareto front.

Hyperparameter optimization constitutes a large part of typical modern machine learning (ML) workflows. This arises from the fact that ML methods and corresponding preprocessing steps often only yield optimal performance when hyperparameters are properly tuned. But in many applications, we are not only interested in optimizing ML pipelines solely for predictive accuracy; additional metrics or constraints must be considered when determining an optimal configuration, resulting in a multi-objective optimization problem. This is often neglected in practice, due to a lack of knowledge and readily available software implementations for multi-objective hyperparameter optimization. In this work, we introduce the reader to the basics of multi-objective hyperparameter optimization and motivate its usefulness in applied ML. Furthermore, we provide an extensive survey of existing optimization strategies from the domains of evolutionary algorithms and Bayesian optimization. We illustrate the utility of multi-objective optimization in several specific ML applications, considering objectives such as operating conditions, prediction time, sparseness, fairness, interpretability, and robustness.

It is a common practice in the machine learning community to assume that the observed data are noise-free in the input attributes. Nevertheless, scenarios with input noise are common in real problems, as measurements are never perfectly accurate. If this input noise is not taken into account, a supervised machine learning method is expected to perform sub-optimally. In this paper, we focus on multi-class classification problems and use Gaussian processes (GPs) as the underlying classifier. Motivated by a data set coming from the astrophysics domain, we hypothesize that the observed data may contain noise in the inputs. Therefore, we devise several multi-class GP classifiers that can account for input noise. Such classifiers can be efficiently trained using variational inference to approximate the posterior distribution of the latent variables of the model. Moreover, in some situations, the amount of noise can be known before-hand. If this is the case, it can be readily introduced in the proposed methods. This prior information is expected to lead to better performance results. We have evaluated the proposed methods by carrying out several experiments, involving synthetic and real data. These include several data sets from the UCI repository, the MNIST data set and a data set coming from astrophysics. The results obtained show that, although the classification error is similar across methods, the predictive distribution of the proposed methods is better, in terms of the test log-likelihood, than the predictive distribution of a classifier based on GPs that ignores input noise.