Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mingxin Zheng
dblp:201/7901
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Vision and language · 43% Graph learning · 38% Multi-agent systems · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › domain-specific vision-language model
medical vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VILA-M3: Enhancing Vision-Language Models with Medical Expert Knowledge · CVPR 2025 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging
medical image analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | VILA-M3: Enhancing Vision-Language Models with Medical Expert Knowledge · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
network embedding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | RiWalk: Fast Structural Node Embedding via Role Identification · ICDM 2019 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent coordination
role discovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | RiWalk: Fast Structural Node Embedding via Role Identification · ICDM 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › network embedding
structural node embedding |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | RiWalk: Fast Structural Node Embedding via Role Identification · ICDM 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
segmentation · 1.7instruction fine-tuning · 1.7domain expert models · 1.7classification · 1.7weisfeiler-lehman · 0.4rooted kernel · 0.4random walk · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | VILA-M3: Enhancing Vision-Language Models with Medical Expert KnowledgeabstractGeneralist vision language models (VLMs) have made significant strides in computer vision, but they fall short in specialized fields like healthcare, where expert knowledge is essential. Current large multimodal models like Gemini and GPT-4o are insufficient for medical tasks due to their reliance on memorized internet knowledge rather than the nuanced expertise required in healthcare. Meanwhile, existing medical VLMs (e.g. Med-Gemini) often lack expert consultation as part of their design, and many rely on outdated, static datasets that were not created with modern, large deep learning models in mind. VLMs are usually trained in three stages: vision pre-training, vision-language pre-training, and instruction fine-tuning (IFT). IFT has been typically applied using a mixture of generic and healthcare data. In contrast, we propose that for medical VLMs, a fourth stage of specialized IFT is necessary, which focuses on medical data and includes information from domain expert models. Domain expert models developed for medical use are crucial because they are specifically trained for certain clinical tasks, e.g. to detect tumors and classify abnormalities through segmentation and classification, which learn fine-grained features of medical data−features that are often too intricate for a VLM to capture effectively. This paper introduces a new framework, VILA-M3, for medical VLMs that utilizes domain knowledge via expert models. We argue that generic VLM architectures alone are not viable for real-world clinical applications and on-demand usage of domain-specialized expert model knowledge is critical for advancing AI in healthcare. Through our experiments, we show an improved state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance with an average improvement of ~9% over the prior SOTA model Med-Gemini and ~6% over models trained on the specific tasks. Our approach emphasizes the importance of domain expertise in creating precise, reliable VLMs for medical applications. Vishwesh Nath, Wenqi Li 0001, Dong Yang 0005, Andriy Myronenko, Mingxin Zheng, Yao Lu 0006, Hongxu Yin, Yee Man Law, Yucheng Tang, Can Zhao 0001, Ziyue Xu 0001, Yufan He, Stephanie A. Harmon, Benjamin Simon, Greg Heinrich, Stephen R. Aylward, Marc Edgar, Michael Zephyr, Pavlo Molchanov 0001, Baris Turkbey, Holger Roth, Daguang Xu |
CVPR | 5 |
| 2019 | RiWalk: Fast Structural Node Embedding via Role IdentificationabstractNodes performing different functions in a network have different roles, and these roles can be gleaned from the structure of the network. Learning latent representations for the roles of nodes helps to understand the network and to transfer knowledge across networks. However, most existing structural embedding approaches suffer from high computation and space cost or rely on heuristic feature engineering. Here we propose RiWalk, a flexible paradigm for learning structural node representations as it decouples the structural embedding problem into a role identification procedure and a network embedding procedure. Through role identification, rooted kernels with structural dependencies kept are built to better integrate network embedding methods. To demonstrate the effectiveness of RiWalk, we develop two different role identification methods named RiWalk-SP and RiWalk-WL respectively and employ random walk based network embedding methods. Experiments on within-network classification tasks show that our proposed algorithms achieve comparable performance with other baselines while being an order of magnitude more efficient. Besides, we also conduct across-network role classification tasks. The results show potential of structural embeddings in transfer learning. RiWalk is also scalable, making it capable of capturing structural roles in massive networks. Xuewei Ma, Geng Qin, Zhiyang Qiu, Mingxin Zheng |
ICDM | 4 |