Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vijay Deep Bhatt
dblp:201/8520
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | G-QED: Generalized QED Pre-silicon Verification beyond Non-Interfering Hardware Accelerators · DAC 2023 |
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › functional verification
pre-silicon verification |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | G-QED: Generalized QED Pre-silicon Verification beyond Non-Interfering Hardware Accelerators · DAC 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quick error detection · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | G-QED: Generalized QED Pre-silicon Verification beyond Non-Interfering Hardware AcceleratorsabstractHardware accelerators (HAs) underpin high-performance and energy-efficient digital systems. Correctness of these systems thus depends on the correctness of constituent HAs. Self-consistency-based pre-silicon verification techniques, like A-QED (Accelerator Quick Error Detection), provide a quick and provably thorough HA verification framework that does not require extensive design-specific properties or a full functional specification. However, A-QED is limited to verifying HAs which are non-interfering – i.e., they produce the same result for a given input independent of its context within a sequence of inputs. We present a new technique called G-QED (Generalized QED) which goes beyond non-interfering HAs while retaining A-QED’s benefits. Our extensive results as well as a detailed industrial case study show that: G-QED is highly thorough in detecting critical bugs in well-verified designs that otherwise escape traditional verification flows while simultaneously improving verification productivity 18-fold (from 370 person days to 21 person days). These results are backed by theoretical guarantees of soundness and completeness. Saranyu Chattopadhyay, Keerthikumara Devarajegowda, Bihan Zhao, Florian Lonsing, Brandon A. D'Agostino, Ioanna Vavelidou, Vijay Deep Bhatt, Sebastian Siegfried Prebeck, Wolfgang Ecker, Caroline Trippel, Clark W. Barrett, Subhasish Mitra |
DAC | 7 |