EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chris Shenefiel
dblp:201/9301
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 2Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 67% Empirical software engineering · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Empirical software engineering
mining software repositories |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Improving the effectiveness of traceability link recovery using hierarchical bayesian networks · ICSE 2020 |
Software maintenance and evolution
traceability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Improving the effectiveness of traceability link recovery using hierarchical bayesian networks · ICSE 2020 |
Software maintenance and evolution › traceability
traceability link recovery |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Improving the effectiveness of traceability link recovery using hierarchical bayesian networks · ICSE 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical bayesian network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Locating the work of artificial intelligence ethicsabstractAbstract The scale and complexity of the data and algorithms used in artificial intelligence (AI)‐based systems present significant challenges for anticipating their ethical, legal, and policy implications. Given these challenges, who does the work of AI ethics, and how do they do it? This study reports findings from interviews with 26 stakeholders in AI research, law, and policy. The primary themes are that the work of AI ethics is structured by personal values and professional commitments, and that it involves situated meaning‐making through data and algorithms. Given the stakes involved, it is not enough to simply satisfy that AI will not behave unethically; rather, the work of AI ethics needs to be incentivized. Stephen C. Slota, Kenneth R. Fleischmann, Sherri R. Greenberg, Nitin Verma, Brenna Cummings, Lan Li 0003, Chris Shenefiel |
J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. | 7 |
| 2020 | Improving the effectiveness of traceability link recovery using hierarchical bayesian networksabstractTraceability is a fundamental component of the modern software development process that helps to ensure properly functioning, secure programs. Due to the high cost of manually establishing trace links, researchers have developed automated approaches that draw relationships between pairs of textual software artifacts using similarity measures. However, the effectiveness of such techniques are often limited as they only utilize a single measure of artifact similarity and cannot simultaneously model (implicit and explicit) relationships across groups of diverse development artifacts. Kevin Moran, David Nader-Palacio, Carlos Bernal-Cárdenas, Daniel McCrystal, Denys Poshyvanyk, Chris Shenefiel |
ICSE | 6 |
| 2019 | Learning to Identify Security-Related Issues Using Convolutional Neural NetworksabstractSoftware security is becoming a high priority for both large companies and start-ups alike due to the increasing potential for harm that vulnerabilities and breaches carry with them. However, attaining robust security assurance while delivering features requires a precarious balancing act in the context of agile development practices. One path forward to help aid development teams in securing their software products is through the design and development of security-focused automation. Ergo, we present a novel approach, called SecureReqNet, for automatically identifying whether issues in software issue tracking systems describe security-related content. Our approach consists of a two-phase neural net architecture that operates purely on the natural language descriptions of issues. The first phase of our approach learns high dimensional word embeddings from hundreds of thousands of vulnerability descriptions listed in the CVE database and issue descriptions extracted from open source projects. The second phase then utilizes the semantic ontology represented by these embeddings to train a convolutional neural network capable of predicting whether a given issue is security-related. We evaluated SecureReqNet by applying it to identify security-related issues from a dataset of thousands of issues mined from popular projects on GitLab and GitHub. In addition, we also applied our approach to identify security-related requirements from a commercial software project developed by a major telecommunication company. Our preliminary results are encouraging, with SecureReqNet achieving an accuracy of 96% on open source issues and 71.6% on industrial requirements. David Nader-Palacio, Daniel McCrystal, Kevin Moran, Carlos Bernal-Cárdenas, Denys Poshyvanyk, Chris Shenefiel |
ICSME | 6 |
| 2019 | Automated IoT Device Fingerprinting Through Encrypted Stream Classification
Kun Sun 0001, Chris Shenefiel |
SecureComm (1) | 3 |
| 2017 | SPEAKER: Split-Phase Execution of Application Containers
Lingguang Lei, Kun Sun 0001, Chris Shenefiel, Yuewu Wang, Qi Li 0002 |
DIMVA | 4 |