Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander Erreygers

dblp:202/1337 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
5as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-0409-2999ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 5 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Network performance modeling · 67% Optical networks · 33%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Network performance modeling › loss systems
blocking probability
0.312018
Imprecise Markov Models for Scalable and Robust Performance Evaluation of Flexi-Grid Spectrum Allocation Policies · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2018
Network performance modeling
markov chain model
0.312018
Imprecise Markov Models for Scalable and Robust Performance Evaluation of Flexi-Grid Spectrum Allocation Policies · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2018
Optical networks › elastic optical networks
spectrum fragmentation
0.312018
Imprecise Markov Models for Scalable and Robust Performance Evaluation of Flexi-Grid Spectrum Allocation Policies · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reduced-state markov chain · 0.3imprecise markov model · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Conservative decision-making with sets of probabilities: How to infer new choices from previous ones
Arne Decadt, Alexander Erreygers, Jasper De Bock
Fuzzy Sets Syst.2
2025 Extending choice assessments to choice functions: An algorithm for computing the natural extension
Arne Decadt, Alexander Erreygers, Jasper De Bock
Int. J. Approx. Reason.2
2024 Convex expectations for countable-state uncertain processes with càdlàg sample paths
Alexander Erreygers
Int. J. Approx. Reason.1
2022 Markovian imprecise jump processes: Extension to measurable variables, convergence theorems and algorithms
Alexander Erreygers, Jasper De Bock
Int. J. Approx. Reason.1
2021 Sum-product laws and efficient algorithms for imprecise Markov chains
abstract
We propose two sum-product laws for imprecise Markov chains, and use these laws to derive two algorithms to efficiently compute lower and upper expectations for imprecise Markov chains under complete independence and epistemic irrelevance. These algorithms work for inferences that have a corresponding sum-product decomposition, and we argue that many well-known inferences fit their scope. We illustrate our results on a simple epidemiological example.
Jasper De Bock, Alexander Erreygers, Thomas E. Krak
UAI2
2020 A Study of the Set of Probability Measures Compatible with Comparative Judgements
Alexander Erreygers, Enrique Miranda 0001
IPMU (2)1
2019 Bounding inferences for large-scale continuous-time Markov chains: A new approach based on lumping and imprecise Markov chains
Alexander Erreygers, Jasper De Bock
Int. J. Approx. Reason.1
2018 Imprecise Markov Models for Scalable and Robust Performance Evaluation of Flexi-Grid Spectrum Allocation Policies
abstract
The possibility of flexibly assigning spectrum resources with channels of different sizes greatly improves the spectral efficiency of optical networks, but can also lead to unwanted spectrum fragmentation. We study this problem in a scenario where traffic demands are categorized in two types (low or high bit-rate) by assessing the performance of three allocation policies. Our first contribution consists of exact Markov chain models for these allocation policies, which allow us to numerically compute the relevant performance measures. However, these exact models do not scale to large systems, in the sense that the computations required to determine the blocking probabilities-which measure the performance of the allocation policies-become intractable. In order to address this, we first extend an approximate reduced-state Markov chain model that is available in the literature to the three considered allocation policies. These reduced-state Markov chain models allow us to tractably compute approximations of the blocking probabilities, but the accuracy of these approximations cannot be easily verified. Our main contribution then is the introduction of reduced-state imprecise Markov chain models that allow us to derive guaranteed lower and upper bounds on blocking probabilities, for the three allocation policies separately or for all possible allocation policies simultaneously.
Alexander Erreygers, Cristina Rottondi, Giacomo Verticale, Jasper De Bock
IEEE Trans. Commun.1